腹膜细胞学阳性胰腺癌患者的最佳治疗策略:由日本肝胆胰外科协会指导的全国多中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12074
Kyohei Ariake, Masamichi Mizuma, Michiaki Unno, Sohei Satoi, Naoto Yamamoto, Masamichi Hayashi, Manabu Kawai, Hirofumi Akita, Eiji Toyoda, Tsutomu Fujii, Masaru Sasaki, Kenichi Hakamada, Jota Watanabe, Etsuro Hatano, Masaaki Hidaka, Satoshi Hirano, Hiroshi Kurahara, Ippei Matsumoto, Goro Honda, Toshiro Ogura, Masafumi Nakamura, Itaru Endo
{"title":"腹膜细胞学阳性胰腺癌患者的最佳治疗策略:由日本肝胆胰外科协会指导的全国多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Kyohei Ariake, Masamichi Mizuma, Michiaki Unno, Sohei Satoi, Naoto Yamamoto, Masamichi Hayashi, Manabu Kawai, Hirofumi Akita, Eiji Toyoda, Tsutomu Fujii, Masaru Sasaki, Kenichi Hakamada, Jota Watanabe, Etsuro Hatano, Masaaki Hidaka, Satoshi Hirano, Hiroshi Kurahara, Ippei Matsumoto, Goro Honda, Toshiro Ogura, Masafumi Nakamura, Itaru Endo","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer (PaCa) having positive peritoneal cytology (PPC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with PPC treated at 78 high-volume centers between January 2012 and December 2020. Prognoses after resection (S-group) and initiation of nonsurgical treatment (N-group) were compared. Prognostic factors for survival in both groups were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of conversion surgery (CS) in the N-group were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 568 enrolled patients were classified into an S-group (n = 445) or an N-group (n = 123). Median survival times (MSTs) were 19.0 months and 19.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference in prognosis (p = .845). The intervenable prognostic factors for survival were adjuvant treatment in the S-group (p < .001) and CS in the N-group (p < .001). Following CS, the MST was prolonged to 45.6 months, and peritoneal or liver recurrence decreased considerably. CS can be expected if PPC is diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment and when combination treatment is initiated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical resection may not be beneficial for improving survival when PPC is evident. Chemotherapy aiming for CS may be the optimal treatment for such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer having positive peritoneal cytology: A nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study supervised by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Kyohei Ariake, Masamichi Mizuma, Michiaki Unno, Sohei Satoi, Naoto Yamamoto, Masamichi Hayashi, Manabu Kawai, Hirofumi Akita, Eiji Toyoda, Tsutomu Fujii, Masaru Sasaki, Kenichi Hakamada, Jota Watanabe, Etsuro Hatano, Masaaki Hidaka, Satoshi Hirano, Hiroshi Kurahara, Ippei Matsumoto, Goro Honda, Toshiro Ogura, Masafumi Nakamura, Itaru Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer (PaCa) having positive peritoneal cytology (PPC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with PPC treated at 78 high-volume centers between January 2012 and December 2020. Prognoses after resection (S-group) and initiation of nonsurgical treatment (N-group) were compared. Prognostic factors for survival in both groups were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of conversion surgery (CS) in the N-group were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 568 enrolled patients were classified into an S-group (n = 445) or an N-group (n = 123). Median survival times (MSTs) were 19.0 months and 19.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference in prognosis (p = .845). The intervenable prognostic factors for survival were adjuvant treatment in the S-group (p < .001) and CS in the N-group (p < .001). Following CS, the MST was prolonged to 45.6 months, and peritoneal or liver recurrence decreased considerably. CS can be expected if PPC is diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment and when combination treatment is initiated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical resection may not be beneficial for improving survival when PPC is evident. Chemotherapy aiming for CS may be the optimal treatment for such patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在确定腹膜细胞学(PPC)阳性胰腺癌患者的最佳治疗方法:本研究旨在确定腹腔细胞学(PPC)阳性胰腺癌(PaCa)患者的最佳治疗方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在 78 个高容量中心接受治疗的胰腺癌患者。比较了切除术(S组)和非手术治疗(N组)后的预后。分析了两组患者的生存预后因素。评估了 N 组转换手术(CS)的详细特征:共有 568 名入选患者被分为 S 组(445 人)或 N 组(123 人)。中位生存时间(MST)分别为 19.0 个月和 19.3 个月,预后无显著差异(P = .845)。可干预生存预后的因素是 S 组的辅助治疗(p 结论:手术切除可能对癌症患者的预后不利:当 PPC 明显时,手术切除可能无益于提高生存率。以 CS 为目标的化疗可能是此类患者的最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer having positive peritoneal cytology: A nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study supervised by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer (PaCa) having positive peritoneal cytology (PPC).

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with PPC treated at 78 high-volume centers between January 2012 and December 2020. Prognoses after resection (S-group) and initiation of nonsurgical treatment (N-group) were compared. Prognostic factors for survival in both groups were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of conversion surgery (CS) in the N-group were evaluated.

Results: In total, 568 enrolled patients were classified into an S-group (n = 445) or an N-group (n = 123). Median survival times (MSTs) were 19.0 months and 19.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference in prognosis (p = .845). The intervenable prognostic factors for survival were adjuvant treatment in the S-group (p < .001) and CS in the N-group (p < .001). Following CS, the MST was prolonged to 45.6 months, and peritoneal or liver recurrence decreased considerably. CS can be expected if PPC is diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment and when combination treatment is initiated.

Conclusion: Surgical resection may not be beneficial for improving survival when PPC is evident. Chemotherapy aiming for CS may be the optimal treatment for such patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive approach of hepatectomy and thrombectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with right atrial tumor thrombus without sternotomy using percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Prognostic significance of creatine kinase in resected pancreatic cancer. Short- and long-term outcomes of liver resection with hepatic vein reconstruction for liver tumors: A nationwide multicenter survey. Issue Information Frailty as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with hepatectomy - the importance of design studies to improve frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 128 868 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1