在COVID-19重症和危重症患者中,巴利替尼和皮质类固醇的疗效与单用皮质类固醇的疗效相比:日本多中心住院患者数据库研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.020
Tomoki Mizuno, Jun Suzuki, Shota Takahashi, Haruka Imai, Hideya Itagaki, Makiko Yoshida, Shiro Endo
{"title":"在COVID-19重症和危重症患者中,巴利替尼和皮质类固醇的疗效与单用皮质类固醇的疗效相比:日本多中心住院患者数据库研究。","authors":"Tomoki Mizuno, Jun Suzuki, Shota Takahashi, Haruka Imai, Hideya Itagaki, Makiko Yoshida, Shiro Endo","doi":"10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic baricitinib and corticosteroids play important roles in treating severely and critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the efficacy of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged >18 years between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2023, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching to analyze the effect of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids within 2 days of hospital admission (combination group) on the 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates compared with those of corticosteroid monotherapy within 2 days of hospital admission (control group). Sensitivity analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting analysis and the generalized estimating equation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The eligible patients (n = 7433) were divided into a combination (n = 679) and a control group (n = 6754). One-to-four propensity score matching analyses included 566 combination and 2264 control group patients. There was no significant difference in 28-day (8.5 % vs. 8.8 %; risk difference, -0.3 % [95 % confidence interval, -2.9 to 2.3]) or in-hospital (11 % vs. 10 %; risk difference, 1.0 [-1.9 to 3.9]) mortality rates between 2 groups. The sensitivity analysis showed similar outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This observational study, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database, found that the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroid therapy did not improve the 28-day or in-hospital mortality rates in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared to corticosteroid monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of baricitinib and corticosteroid compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19: A Japanese multicenter inpatient database study.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoki Mizuno, Jun Suzuki, Shota Takahashi, Haruka Imai, Hideya Itagaki, Makiko Yoshida, Shiro Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic baricitinib and corticosteroids play important roles in treating severely and critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the efficacy of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged >18 years between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2023, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching to analyze the effect of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids within 2 days of hospital admission (combination group) on the 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates compared with those of corticosteroid monotherapy within 2 days of hospital admission (control group). Sensitivity analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting analysis and the generalized estimating equation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The eligible patients (n = 7433) were divided into a combination (n = 679) and a control group (n = 6754). One-to-four propensity score matching analyses included 566 combination and 2264 control group patients. There was no significant difference in 28-day (8.5 % vs. 8.8 %; risk difference, -0.3 % [95 % confidence interval, -2.9 to 2.3]) or in-hospital (11 % vs. 10 %; risk difference, 1.0 [-1.9 to 3.9]) mortality rates between 2 groups. The sensitivity analysis showed similar outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This observational study, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database, found that the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroid therapy did not improve the 28-day or in-hospital mortality rates in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared to corticosteroid monotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全身使用巴利昔尼和皮质类固醇在治疗冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)重症和危重患者中发挥着重要作用。然而,与皮质类固醇单药治疗相比,巴利昔尼和皮质类固醇联合治疗COVID-19重症和危重住院患者的疗效仍不明确:我们利用日本多中心住院患者数据库分析了2020年1月1日至2023年5月31日期间年龄大于18岁的COVID-19重症和危重住院患者。我们进行了倾向得分匹配,分析了巴利昔尼与皮质类固醇在入院 2 天内联合治疗(联合组)与皮质类固醇在入院 2 天内单一治疗(对照组)相比,对 28 天死亡率和院内死亡率的影响。采用反概率加权分析法和广义估计方程法进行了敏感性分析:符合条件的患者(n = 7433)被分为联合组(n = 679)和对照组(n = 6754)。对566名联合组患者和2264名对照组患者进行了一对四倾向评分匹配分析。两组患者的 28 天死亡率(8.5% 对 8.8%;风险差异,-0.3% [95% 置信区间,-2.9 至 2.3])和院内死亡率(11% 对 10%;风险差异,1.0 [-1.9 至 3.9])无明显差异。敏感性分析显示结果相似:这项使用日本多中心住院患者数据库进行的观察性研究发现,与皮质类固醇单药治疗相比,巴利昔尼和皮质类固醇联合治疗并不能改善COVID-19重症和危重患者的28天或院内死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of baricitinib and corticosteroid compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19: A Japanese multicenter inpatient database study.

Background: Systemic baricitinib and corticosteroids play important roles in treating severely and critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the efficacy of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unclear.

Methods: We analyzed severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged >18 years between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2023, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching to analyze the effect of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids within 2 days of hospital admission (combination group) on the 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates compared with those of corticosteroid monotherapy within 2 days of hospital admission (control group). Sensitivity analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting analysis and the generalized estimating equation method.

Results: The eligible patients (n = 7433) were divided into a combination (n = 679) and a control group (n = 6754). One-to-four propensity score matching analyses included 566 combination and 2264 control group patients. There was no significant difference in 28-day (8.5 % vs. 8.8 %; risk difference, -0.3 % [95 % confidence interval, -2.9 to 2.3]) or in-hospital (11 % vs. 10 %; risk difference, 1.0 [-1.9 to 3.9]) mortality rates between 2 groups. The sensitivity analysis showed similar outcomes.

Conclusion: This observational study, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database, found that the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroid therapy did not improve the 28-day or in-hospital mortality rates in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared to corticosteroid monotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (JIC) — official journal of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases — welcomes original papers, laboratory or clinical, as well as case reports, notes, committee reports, surveillance and guidelines from all parts of the world on all aspects of chemotherapy, covering the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control of infection, including treatment with anticancer drugs. Experimental studies on animal models and pharmacokinetics, and reports on epidemiology and clinical trials are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron pneumonia. Encrusted pyelitis and hyperammonemia due to Corynebacterium urealyticum in a kidney transplant recipient. Teicoplanin 24-h loading dose regimen using a decision tree model to target serum trough concentration of 15-30 μg/mL: A retrospective study. Identification of causative and non-causative microorganisms of nephrostomy tube-associated pyelonephritis among patients with malignancy. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of infection in initially treated patients with multiple myeloma during the induction period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1