过去 10 年使用右美托咪定导致横纹肌溶解的风险:来自 EudraVigilance 数据库的启示。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Personalized Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3390/jpm14090961
Nunzia Balzano, Annamaria Mascolo, Raffaella Di Napoli, Federica Colapietra, Marina Di Domenico, Annalisa Capuano, Francesca Gargano
{"title":"过去 10 年使用右美托咪定导致横纹肌溶解的风险:来自 EudraVigilance 数据库的启示。","authors":"Nunzia Balzano, Annamaria Mascolo, Raffaella Di Napoli, Federica Colapietra, Marina Di Domenico, Annalisa Capuano, Francesca Gargano","doi":"10.3390/jpm14090961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, is favoured in intensive care for its minimal respiratory depression. This study evaluated the reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis with dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam and propofol using the European pharmacovigilance database Eudravigilance. We conducted an observational, retrospective analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from 1 January 2013, to 31 December 2023. Primary and secondary outcomes included the reporting frequencies of rhabdomyolysis and its indicative signs and symptoms, respectively. We retrieved 19,268 ICSRs, of which 364 reported rhabdomyolysis associated with dexmedetomidine (3.8%), midazolam (10.2%), propofol (76.9%), or combinations thereof (9.1%). Dexmedetomidine showed a significantly lower reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis compared to propofol (ROR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55) but no significant difference compared to midazolam. Subgroup analyses revealed higher frequencies in males, especially with propofol. Despite limitations such as underreporting, our findings suggest dexmedetomidine poses a lower rhabdomyolysis risk than propofol, supporting its safe use for sedation in high-risk patients. It is important to note that due to the retrospective design of this study our findings are indicative of correlations rather than causation. Continuous monitoring and further studies are recommended to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Rhabdomyolysis Associated with Dexmedetomidine Use over the Past 10 Years: Insights from the EudraVigilance Database.\",\"authors\":\"Nunzia Balzano, Annamaria Mascolo, Raffaella Di Napoli, Federica Colapietra, Marina Di Domenico, Annalisa Capuano, Francesca Gargano\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jpm14090961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, is favoured in intensive care for its minimal respiratory depression. This study evaluated the reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis with dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam and propofol using the European pharmacovigilance database Eudravigilance. We conducted an observational, retrospective analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from 1 January 2013, to 31 December 2023. Primary and secondary outcomes included the reporting frequencies of rhabdomyolysis and its indicative signs and symptoms, respectively. We retrieved 19,268 ICSRs, of which 364 reported rhabdomyolysis associated with dexmedetomidine (3.8%), midazolam (10.2%), propofol (76.9%), or combinations thereof (9.1%). Dexmedetomidine showed a significantly lower reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis compared to propofol (ROR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55) but no significant difference compared to midazolam. Subgroup analyses revealed higher frequencies in males, especially with propofol. Despite limitations such as underreporting, our findings suggest dexmedetomidine poses a lower rhabdomyolysis risk than propofol, supporting its safe use for sedation in high-risk patients. It is important to note that due to the retrospective design of this study our findings are indicative of correlations rather than causation. Continuous monitoring and further studies are recommended to validate these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11432986/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personalized Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090961\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

右美托咪定是一种选择性α2-肾上腺素能激动剂,因其对呼吸的抑制作用最小而受到重症监护的青睐。本研究利用欧洲药物警戒数据库 Eudravigilance 评估了右美托咪定与咪达唑仑和异丙酚相比发生横纹肌溶解症的报告频率。我们对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日的单个病例安全性报告 (ICSR) 进行了观察性、回顾性分析。主要结果和次要结果分别包括横纹肌溶解及其指示性体征和症状的报告频率。我们检索了 19,268 份 ICSR,其中 364 份报告了与右美托咪定(3.8%)、咪达唑仑(10.2%)、异丙酚(76.9%)或上述药物组合(9.1%)相关的横纹肌溶解症。与异丙酚相比,右美托咪定的横纹肌溶解报告频率明显较低(ROR,0.32;95% CI,0.19-0.55),但与咪达唑仑相比无明显差异。亚组分析显示,男性发生横纹肌溶解症的频率较高,尤其是使用异丙酚时。尽管存在报告不足等局限性,但我们的研究结果表明右美托咪定的横纹肌溶解风险低于异丙酚,支持将其安全用于高风险患者的镇静。值得注意的是,由于本研究采用的是回顾性设计,我们的研究结果只能说明相关性而非因果关系。建议进行持续监测和进一步研究,以验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of Rhabdomyolysis Associated with Dexmedetomidine Use over the Past 10 Years: Insights from the EudraVigilance Database.

Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, is favoured in intensive care for its minimal respiratory depression. This study evaluated the reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis with dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam and propofol using the European pharmacovigilance database Eudravigilance. We conducted an observational, retrospective analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from 1 January 2013, to 31 December 2023. Primary and secondary outcomes included the reporting frequencies of rhabdomyolysis and its indicative signs and symptoms, respectively. We retrieved 19,268 ICSRs, of which 364 reported rhabdomyolysis associated with dexmedetomidine (3.8%), midazolam (10.2%), propofol (76.9%), or combinations thereof (9.1%). Dexmedetomidine showed a significantly lower reporting frequency of rhabdomyolysis compared to propofol (ROR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55) but no significant difference compared to midazolam. Subgroup analyses revealed higher frequencies in males, especially with propofol. Despite limitations such as underreporting, our findings suggest dexmedetomidine poses a lower rhabdomyolysis risk than propofol, supporting its safe use for sedation in high-risk patients. It is important to note that due to the retrospective design of this study our findings are indicative of correlations rather than causation. Continuous monitoring and further studies are recommended to validate these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
期刊最新文献
Applications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems in the Management of Esophageal Varices. Clinical and Laboratory Parameters Associated with PICU Admission in Children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Associated with COVID-19 (MIS-C). Oral Care in Head and Neck Radiotherapy: Proposal for an Oral Hygiene Protocol. Sinonasal Outcomes Obtained after 2 Years of Treatment with Benralizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma and CRSwNP: A "Real-Life" Observational Study. Melatonin Receptors and Serotonin: Age-Related Changes in the Ovaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1