血管紧张素 II 治疗心胸重症监护病房分布性休克的血栓安全性。

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1177/08971900241287614
Christine M Cunningham, Anna E Pawlowski, Sarah B Schaidle
{"title":"血管紧张素 II 治疗心胸重症监护病房分布性休克的血栓安全性。","authors":"Christine M Cunningham, Anna E Pawlowski, Sarah B Schaidle","doi":"10.1177/08971900241287614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Angiotensin II (ATII) has been shown in the literature to increase the risk of thrombosis. Little data exists in patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) due to exclusion from landmark trials. <b>Objective:</b> Evaluate the thrombotic risk of ATII in patients in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) with distributive shock. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective study including adult patients admitted to the CTICU with temporary MCS. This study evaluated patients ≥18 years old on temporary MCS in the CTICU between September 1st, 2018 and August 30th, 2022. Patients that received ATII were compared to a control group for the outcome of an index thrombotic event. The outcomes were compared using the Fischer's exact or chi-squared test. <b>Results:</b> A total of 75 patients primarily admitted for cardiac surgery were included, of which 41 (54.7%) received ATII. The rates of overall thrombosis were higher in the ATII group compared to the control, though the outcome was not statistically significant (41.5% vs 20.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.05). Individual thrombotic components of the composite outcome were not statistically significant between groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Numerically higher rates of thrombosis were seen in patients on MCS that received ATII, though the outcome was not statistically significant. This retrospective study provides a single-center, real-world safety perspective on the use of ATII in MCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900241287614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombotic Safety of Angiotensin II for Distributive Shock in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Christine M Cunningham, Anna E Pawlowski, Sarah B Schaidle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08971900241287614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Angiotensin II (ATII) has been shown in the literature to increase the risk of thrombosis. Little data exists in patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) due to exclusion from landmark trials. <b>Objective:</b> Evaluate the thrombotic risk of ATII in patients in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) with distributive shock. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective study including adult patients admitted to the CTICU with temporary MCS. This study evaluated patients ≥18 years old on temporary MCS in the CTICU between September 1st, 2018 and August 30th, 2022. Patients that received ATII were compared to a control group for the outcome of an index thrombotic event. The outcomes were compared using the Fischer's exact or chi-squared test. <b>Results:</b> A total of 75 patients primarily admitted for cardiac surgery were included, of which 41 (54.7%) received ATII. The rates of overall thrombosis were higher in the ATII group compared to the control, though the outcome was not statistically significant (41.5% vs 20.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.05). Individual thrombotic components of the composite outcome were not statistically significant between groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Numerically higher rates of thrombosis were seen in patients on MCS that received ATII, though the outcome was not statistically significant. This retrospective study provides a single-center, real-world safety perspective on the use of ATII in MCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8971900241287614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241287614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241287614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:文献显示,血管紧张素 II (ATII) 会增加血栓形成的风险。由于机械循环支持(MCS)患者被排除在具有里程碑意义的试验之外,因此几乎没有这方面的数据。目标:评估机械循环支持疗法的血栓形成风险:评估分配性休克心胸重症监护病房(CTICU)患者使用 ATII 的血栓风险。方法:回顾性研究回顾性研究,包括入住 CTICU 并患有暂时性 MCS 的成人患者。本研究评估了2018年9月1日至2022年8月30日期间在CTICU接受临时MCS的≥18岁患者。将接受 ATII 的患者与对照组患者的血栓事件指数结果进行比较。结果比较采用费舍尔精确检验或卡方检验。结果共纳入 75 名主要因心脏手术入院的患者,其中 41 人(54.7%)接受了 ATII 治疗。与对照组相比,ATII 组的总体血栓形成率较高,但结果无统计学意义(41.5% vs 20.6%;P = 0.05)。各组间综合结果中的单个血栓形成部分无统计学意义。结论:接受 ATII 的 MCS 患者血栓形成率在数字上较高,但结果无统计学意义。这项回顾性研究提供了在 MCS 中使用 ATII 的单中心真实安全性视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thrombotic Safety of Angiotensin II for Distributive Shock in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit.

Background: Angiotensin II (ATII) has been shown in the literature to increase the risk of thrombosis. Little data exists in patients with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) due to exclusion from landmark trials. Objective: Evaluate the thrombotic risk of ATII in patients in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) with distributive shock. Methods: Retrospective study including adult patients admitted to the CTICU with temporary MCS. This study evaluated patients ≥18 years old on temporary MCS in the CTICU between September 1st, 2018 and August 30th, 2022. Patients that received ATII were compared to a control group for the outcome of an index thrombotic event. The outcomes were compared using the Fischer's exact or chi-squared test. Results: A total of 75 patients primarily admitted for cardiac surgery were included, of which 41 (54.7%) received ATII. The rates of overall thrombosis were higher in the ATII group compared to the control, though the outcome was not statistically significant (41.5% vs 20.6%; P = 0.05). Individual thrombotic components of the composite outcome were not statistically significant between groups. Conclusion: Numerically higher rates of thrombosis were seen in patients on MCS that received ATII, though the outcome was not statistically significant. This retrospective study provides a single-center, real-world safety perspective on the use of ATII in MCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Care in A Safety Net Hospital: Impact of a Pharmacist Transitional Care Service. Analysis of the 2-Bag Method for the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Retrospective before and after Study. Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Contraception Service at a Safety-Net Health-System. Assessment of a Geriatric Evaluation and Management in the Home (GEMITH) Service at a Quaternary Hospital: A Retrospective Observational Study. The Phenytoin Ataxia Enigma Unveiled "A Case Report''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1