完全结肠系膜切除术 (CME) 仅影响 III 期右侧结肠癌患者的生存率:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2405544
Kengo Hayashi, Roberto Passera, Chiara Meroni, Rebecca Dallorto, Chiara Marafante, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Alberto Arezzo
{"title":"完全结肠系膜切除术 (CME) 仅影响 III 期右侧结肠癌患者的生存率:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kengo Hayashi, Roberto Passera, Chiara Meroni, Rebecca Dallorto, Chiara Marafante, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Alberto Arezzo","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2405544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is widely adopted for its assumed superior oncological outcome. However, it's unclear if all right-sided colon cancer patients benefit from CME. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether CME contributes to postoperative outcomes and to determine the surgical indications for CME.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched eligible articles about CME versus non-CME procedures for right-sided colon cancer in the OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, and a meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two articles and seven abstracts involving 8088 patients were included in this study. Among them, 3803 underwent CME and 4285 non-CME procedures. The analysis showed that CME was favoured for three-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), for local, systemic, and total recurrence, and for hospital stay durations. However, increased vascular injury and longer surgery time were observed in CME. Regarding the three-year OS, the superiority of CME was observed only in Stage III. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between CME and non-CME groups regarding overall complications, 30-day readmission rates, reoperation, or postoperative mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CME for right-sided colon cancer should be considered, particularly in Stage III patients, to contribute to improved oncological outcomes. However, careful attention must be paid to the increased risk of vascular injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complete mesocolic excision (CME) impacts survival only for Stage III right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kengo Hayashi, Roberto Passera, Chiara Meroni, Rebecca Dallorto, Chiara Marafante, Carlo Alberto Ammirati, Alberto Arezzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2024.2405544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is widely adopted for its assumed superior oncological outcome. However, it's unclear if all right-sided colon cancer patients benefit from CME. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether CME contributes to postoperative outcomes and to determine the surgical indications for CME.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched eligible articles about CME versus non-CME procedures for right-sided colon cancer in the OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, and a meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two articles and seven abstracts involving 8088 patients were included in this study. Among them, 3803 underwent CME and 4285 non-CME procedures. The analysis showed that CME was favoured for three-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), for local, systemic, and total recurrence, and for hospital stay durations. However, increased vascular injury and longer surgery time were observed in CME. Regarding the three-year OS, the superiority of CME was observed only in Stage III. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between CME and non-CME groups regarding overall complications, 30-day readmission rates, reoperation, or postoperative mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CME for right-sided colon cancer should be considered, particularly in Stage III patients, to contribute to improved oncological outcomes. However, careful attention must be paid to the increased risk of vascular injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2405544\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2405544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:结肠系膜完全切除术(CME)因其假定的优越肿瘤治疗效果而被广泛采用。然而,尚不清楚是否所有右侧结肠癌患者都能从 CME 中获益。本系统性综述旨在研究 CME 是否有助于术后效果,并确定 CME 的手术适应症:我们在 OVID Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 数据库中检索了符合条件的关于右侧结肠癌 CME 与非 CME 手术的文章,并进行了荟萃分析:本研究共收录了22篇文章和7篇摘要,涉及8088名患者。其中,3803 例接受了 CME,4285 例未接受 CME。分析结果表明,在三年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)、局部复发、全身复发和总复发率以及住院时间方面,CME 更受青睐。不过,CME的血管损伤增加,手术时间延长。在三年生存率方面,仅在III期观察到CME的优越性。此外,在总体并发症、30天再入院率、再次手术率或术后死亡率方面,CME组和非CME组之间没有观察到明显差异:结论:应考虑对右侧结肠癌进行 CME 治疗,尤其是对 III 期患者,以改善肿瘤治疗效果。结论:应考虑对右侧结肠癌患者进行 CME 治疗,尤其是 III 期患者,这有助于改善肿瘤治疗效果,但必须注意血管损伤风险的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) impacts survival only for Stage III right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is widely adopted for its assumed superior oncological outcome. However, it's unclear if all right-sided colon cancer patients benefit from CME. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether CME contributes to postoperative outcomes and to determine the surgical indications for CME.

Material and methods: We searched eligible articles about CME versus non-CME procedures for right-sided colon cancer in the OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, and a meta-analysis was conducted.

Results: Twenty-two articles and seven abstracts involving 8088 patients were included in this study. Among them, 3803 underwent CME and 4285 non-CME procedures. The analysis showed that CME was favoured for three-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), for local, systemic, and total recurrence, and for hospital stay durations. However, increased vascular injury and longer surgery time were observed in CME. Regarding the three-year OS, the superiority of CME was observed only in Stage III. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between CME and non-CME groups regarding overall complications, 30-day readmission rates, reoperation, or postoperative mortality rates.

Conclusions: CME for right-sided colon cancer should be considered, particularly in Stage III patients, to contribute to improved oncological outcomes. However, careful attention must be paid to the increased risk of vascular injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic cardiac mucosal ligation: a novel minimally invasive procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft. Three-dimensional semiquantitative evaluation of reactive emphysema in magnesium implant models. Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1