流变性视网膜脱离患者的玻璃体皮质残留:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Survey of ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.008
Andrea D'Albenzio, Klara Komici, Marzia Affatato, Angela Maria Castelluzzo, Serena De Turris, Emanuele Tonti, Germano Guerra, Roberto dell'Omo
{"title":"流变性视网膜脱离患者的玻璃体皮质残留:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Andrea D'Albenzio, Klara Komici, Marzia Affatato, Angela Maria Castelluzzo, Serena De Turris, Emanuele Tonti, Germano Guerra, Roberto dell'Omo","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The terminology \"vitreous cortex remnants\" (VCR) indicates the outermost lamellae of vitreous cortex that remains attached to the retinal surface as a consequence of vitreoschisis. The relevance of VCR removal in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is unknown. We conducted a review from January 1, 2000, to July 30, 2023, examining 1493 eyes. Outcome measures included: prevalence of VCR, relationship between VCR and detachment recurrence due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and relationship between VCR and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation. A meta-analysis was performed with data reported as odds ratios (OR) or mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals. Prevalence of macular and peripheral VCR was 53.4 and 46.8, respectively, with an overall VCR prevalence of 50.8 (95 % CI 42.6, 59.1) Given the scarcity of available data, meta-analysis regarding the relationship between peripheral VCR and redetachment due to PVR was not feasible. The odds of developing ERM were not statistically different between eyes that had had macular VCR removal vs. eyes that had not (log OR -0.08 [95 % CI -1.06, 0.89 p= 0.89]. Additional prospective studies are required to verify whether removal of VCR may reduce the odds of recurrence of RRD due to PVR and the development of ERM.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitreous cortex remnants in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea D'Albenzio, Klara Komici, Marzia Affatato, Angela Maria Castelluzzo, Serena De Turris, Emanuele Tonti, Germano Guerra, Roberto dell'Omo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The terminology \\\"vitreous cortex remnants\\\" (VCR) indicates the outermost lamellae of vitreous cortex that remains attached to the retinal surface as a consequence of vitreoschisis. The relevance of VCR removal in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is unknown. We conducted a review from January 1, 2000, to July 30, 2023, examining 1493 eyes. Outcome measures included: prevalence of VCR, relationship between VCR and detachment recurrence due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and relationship between VCR and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation. A meta-analysis was performed with data reported as odds ratios (OR) or mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals. Prevalence of macular and peripheral VCR was 53.4 and 46.8, respectively, with an overall VCR prevalence of 50.8 (95 % CI 42.6, 59.1) Given the scarcity of available data, meta-analysis regarding the relationship between peripheral VCR and redetachment due to PVR was not feasible. The odds of developing ERM were not statistically different between eyes that had had macular VCR removal vs. eyes that had not (log OR -0.08 [95 % CI -1.06, 0.89 p= 0.89]. Additional prospective studies are required to verify whether removal of VCR may reduce the odds of recurrence of RRD due to PVR and the development of ERM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玻璃体皮质残余物"(VCR)一词是指玻璃体裂孔后仍附着在视网膜表面的玻璃体皮质最外层。在流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)患者中去除 VCR 的意义尚不清楚。我们对 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 7 月 30 日期间的 1493 只眼睛进行了回顾性研究。结果指标包括:VCR的患病率、VCR与增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)导致的脱离复发之间的关系,以及VCR与视网膜上膜(ERM)形成之间的关系。荟萃分析以几率比(OR)或平均差和 95% 置信区间的形式报告数据。黄斑和周边 VCR 的患病率分别为 53.4 和 46.8,VCR 的总体患病率为 50.8 (95% CI 42.6, 59.1)。 由于可用数据稀少,因此无法就周边 VCR 与 PVR 引起的再脱落之间的关系进行荟萃分析。切除过黄斑 VCR 的眼睛与未切除 VCR 的眼睛发生 ERM 的几率没有统计学差异(log OR -0.08 [95% CI -1.06, 0.89 p=0.89])。需要进行更多的前瞻性研究,以验证切除 VCR 是否可以降低因 PVR 导致的 RRD 复发和 ERM 的发生几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vitreous cortex remnants in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The terminology "vitreous cortex remnants" (VCR) indicates the outermost lamellae of vitreous cortex that remains attached to the retinal surface as a consequence of vitreoschisis. The relevance of VCR removal in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is unknown. We conducted a review from January 1, 2000, to July 30, 2023, examining 1493 eyes. Outcome measures included: prevalence of VCR, relationship between VCR and detachment recurrence due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and relationship between VCR and epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation. A meta-analysis was performed with data reported as odds ratios (OR) or mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals. Prevalence of macular and peripheral VCR was 53.4 and 46.8, respectively, with an overall VCR prevalence of 50.8 (95 % CI 42.6, 59.1) Given the scarcity of available data, meta-analysis regarding the relationship between peripheral VCR and redetachment due to PVR was not feasible. The odds of developing ERM were not statistically different between eyes that had had macular VCR removal vs. eyes that had not (log OR -0.08 [95 % CI -1.06, 0.89 p= 0.89]. Additional prospective studies are required to verify whether removal of VCR may reduce the odds of recurrence of RRD due to PVR and the development of ERM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
期刊最新文献
The adaptive immune system in the retina of diabetics. Applications of artificial intelligence to inherited retinal diseases: A systematic review. Presumed phototoxicity from macular vital staining with brilliant blue G and trypan blue: A post-market surveillance study, systematic review, and synthesis of the literature. Uveitis among people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between retinal vessels caliber and systemic health: A comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1