直接 Xa 因子抑制剂血浆水平升高对紧急手术患者围手术期失血量的影响。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1111/trf.18021
Alexander Mair, Sebastian D Sahli, Jan-Dirk Studt, Julia Braun, Justyna Lunkiewicz, Donat R Spahn, Alexander Kaserer
{"title":"直接 Xa 因子抑制剂血浆水平升高对紧急手术患者围手术期失血量的影响。","authors":"Alexander Mair, Sebastian D Sahli, Jan-Dirk Studt, Julia Braun, Justyna Lunkiewicz, Donat R Spahn, Alexander Kaserer","doi":"10.1111/trf.18021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on the perioperative bleeding risk associated with elevated plasma levels of direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) are limited. This study examines perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor reversal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis includes data from 32 patients who underwent urgent noncardiac surgery between 2018 and 2022. This study aims to analyze perioperative RBC loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor antidote-based reversal or unspecific treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). All patients were managed using a watch-and-wait strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The last determination of FXa inhibitor plasma concentration prior to surgery showed a median of 245 mcg/L (IQR 144-345), with a median time interval of 3.8 h (IQR 2.4-7.2) before incision. Median RBC loss during surgery was 49 mL (IQR 0-253), 189 mL (IQR 104-217) until POD1 and 254 mL (IQR 58-265) until POD3. Only one patient required intraoperative treatment with 4-factor-PCC and none required reversal with andexanet alfa. Linear regression models found no significant influence of FXa inhibitor plasma levels on intraoperative RBC loss. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher RBC loss until postoperative Day 1 compared with apixaban. No thromboembolic events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite markedly elevated plasma concentrations of residual direct FXa inhibitors, perioperative RBC loss was limited in patients undergoing urgent noncardiac surgery. The intraoperative watch-and-wait strategy with selective intraoperative FXa inhibitor reversal or treatment only when required appears to be an appropriate approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"2114-2123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of elevated direct factor Xa inhibitor plasma levels on perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Mair, Sebastian D Sahli, Jan-Dirk Studt, Julia Braun, Justyna Lunkiewicz, Donat R Spahn, Alexander Kaserer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on the perioperative bleeding risk associated with elevated plasma levels of direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) are limited. This study examines perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor reversal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis includes data from 32 patients who underwent urgent noncardiac surgery between 2018 and 2022. This study aims to analyze perioperative RBC loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor antidote-based reversal or unspecific treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). All patients were managed using a watch-and-wait strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The last determination of FXa inhibitor plasma concentration prior to surgery showed a median of 245 mcg/L (IQR 144-345), with a median time interval of 3.8 h (IQR 2.4-7.2) before incision. Median RBC loss during surgery was 49 mL (IQR 0-253), 189 mL (IQR 104-217) until POD1 and 254 mL (IQR 58-265) until POD3. Only one patient required intraoperative treatment with 4-factor-PCC and none required reversal with andexanet alfa. Linear regression models found no significant influence of FXa inhibitor plasma levels on intraoperative RBC loss. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher RBC loss until postoperative Day 1 compared with apixaban. No thromboembolic events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite markedly elevated plasma concentrations of residual direct FXa inhibitors, perioperative RBC loss was limited in patients undergoing urgent noncardiac surgery. The intraoperative watch-and-wait strategy with selective intraoperative FXa inhibitor reversal or treatment only when required appears to be an appropriate approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2114-2123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:有关血浆中直接Xa因子抑制剂(FXa抑制剂)水平升高导致围手术期出血风险的数据十分有限。本研究探讨了 FXa 抑制剂残留水平超过 100 微克/升且术前未逆转 FXa 抑制剂的紧急手术患者围手术期红细胞(RBC)丢失的情况:这项回顾性分析包括2018年至2022年期间接受紧急非心脏手术的32名患者的数据。本研究旨在分析接受紧急手术、FXa抑制剂残留水平超过100微克/升、术前未使用FXa抑制剂抗凝剂逆转或未使用4因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)进行特异性治疗的患者的围手术期RBC丢失情况。所有患者均采用观察和等待策略进行治疗:手术前最后一次测定的 FXa 抑制剂血浆浓度中位数为 245 微克/升(IQR 144-345),中位时间间隔为切口前 3.8 小时(IQR 2.4-7.2)。手术期间红细胞丢失中位数为 49 mL(IQR 0-253),POD1 前为 189 mL(IQR 104-217),POD3 前为 254 mL(IQR 58-265)。只有一名患者需要在术中使用 4-因子-PCC,没有人需要使用安赛蜜α逆转。线性回归模型发现,FXa 抑制剂血浆水平对术中红细胞丢失无明显影响。与阿哌沙班相比,利伐沙班在术后第1天之前的红细胞丢失率更高。未观察到血栓栓塞事件:结论:尽管血浆中残留的直接FXa抑制剂浓度明显升高,但在接受紧急非心脏手术的患者中,围手术期RBC损失有限。术中观察和等待策略以及术中选择性逆转 FXa 抑制剂或仅在需要时进行治疗似乎是一种合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of elevated direct factor Xa inhibitor plasma levels on perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery.

Introduction: Data on the perioperative bleeding risk associated with elevated plasma levels of direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) are limited. This study examines perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor reversal.

Methods: This retrospective analysis includes data from 32 patients who underwent urgent noncardiac surgery between 2018 and 2022. This study aims to analyze perioperative RBC loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor antidote-based reversal or unspecific treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). All patients were managed using a watch-and-wait strategy.

Results: The last determination of FXa inhibitor plasma concentration prior to surgery showed a median of 245 mcg/L (IQR 144-345), with a median time interval of 3.8 h (IQR 2.4-7.2) before incision. Median RBC loss during surgery was 49 mL (IQR 0-253), 189 mL (IQR 104-217) until POD1 and 254 mL (IQR 58-265) until POD3. Only one patient required intraoperative treatment with 4-factor-PCC and none required reversal with andexanet alfa. Linear regression models found no significant influence of FXa inhibitor plasma levels on intraoperative RBC loss. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher RBC loss until postoperative Day 1 compared with apixaban. No thromboembolic events were observed.

Conclusion: Despite markedly elevated plasma concentrations of residual direct FXa inhibitors, perioperative RBC loss was limited in patients undergoing urgent noncardiac surgery. The intraoperative watch-and-wait strategy with selective intraoperative FXa inhibitor reversal or treatment only when required appears to be an appropriate approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Biotinylation of human platelets is compatible with pathogen inactivation treatment and cold storage for clinical studies. Evolving patterns of first blood product use in trauma in the era of hemorrhage control resuscitation. Effect of concurrent pathogen reduction (amotosalen/UVA) and gamma/x-ray irradiation on biochemical characteristics of apheresis platelets in additive solution. ABO*cisAB allele with unusual phenotype in a Brazilian family. Enhanced oxygen availability and preserved aggregative function in platelet concentrates stored at reduced platelet concentration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1