实施新颖的日常绩效改进核对表 (PIC) 可提高创伤中酒精筛查和干预的依从性。

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001517
Michelle Jeffery, Ashley Toussaint, Rachel L Choron, Zachary P Englert, Charoo Piplani, Timothy Murphy, Lisa A Falcon, Mayur Narayan, Amanda L Teichman
{"title":"实施新颖的日常绩效改进核对表 (PIC) 可提高创伤中酒精筛查和干预的依从性。","authors":"Michelle Jeffery, Ashley Toussaint, Rachel L Choron, Zachary P Englert, Charoo Piplani, Timothy Murphy, Lisa A Falcon, Mayur Narayan, Amanda L Teichman","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has demonstrated up to 50% reduction in alcohol-related traumatic injury and is mandated by the American College of Surgeons for trauma center accreditation. While SBIRT effectiveness has been previously investigated, optimal implementation in the trauma setting has not. We sought to improve SBIRT compliance through integration of screening into a performance improvement checklist (PIC) deployed during morning report. We hypothesized that PIC would establish a self-sustaining model for improved alcohol screening/intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study comparing trauma patients pre-PIC (January-May 2022) to post-PIC (January-May 2023) after PIC implementation in January 2023. The primary outcome was SBIRT performance. The PIC prompted alcohol intervention specialist consultation if blood alcohol content >80 mg/dL, <21 years old, or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ≥8. Significance was determined if p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 705 pre-PIC and 840 post-PIC patients. Pre-PIC unscreened patients were more often uninsured (13% vs. 25%, p<0.01) and black (8% vs. 14%, p=0.02) compared with screened pre-PIC patients. There were no significant differences among screened versus unscreened patients after PIC with respect to age, sex, race, or ethnicity (p>0.05). Overall, screening improved pre-PIC to post-PIC (52% vs. 88%, p<0.01) and the percentage of patients who screened positively also increased after PIC (8% vs. 23%, p<0.01). Brief intervention was unchanged (83% vs. 81%, p=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PIC is a novel tool that demonstrated improved alcohol screening and referral. It improved compliance with SBIRT and reduced implicit bias in the population screened. Utilization of a PIC is easily translatable to other centers and could become a national standard to advance performance improvement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a novel daily performance improvement checklist (PIC) improves alcohol screening and intervention compliance in trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Jeffery, Ashley Toussaint, Rachel L Choron, Zachary P Englert, Charoo Piplani, Timothy Murphy, Lisa A Falcon, Mayur Narayan, Amanda L Teichman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has demonstrated up to 50% reduction in alcohol-related traumatic injury and is mandated by the American College of Surgeons for trauma center accreditation. While SBIRT effectiveness has been previously investigated, optimal implementation in the trauma setting has not. We sought to improve SBIRT compliance through integration of screening into a performance improvement checklist (PIC) deployed during morning report. We hypothesized that PIC would establish a self-sustaining model for improved alcohol screening/intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study comparing trauma patients pre-PIC (January-May 2022) to post-PIC (January-May 2023) after PIC implementation in January 2023. The primary outcome was SBIRT performance. The PIC prompted alcohol intervention specialist consultation if blood alcohol content >80 mg/dL, <21 years old, or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ≥8. Significance was determined if p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 705 pre-PIC and 840 post-PIC patients. Pre-PIC unscreened patients were more often uninsured (13% vs. 25%, p<0.01) and black (8% vs. 14%, p=0.02) compared with screened pre-PIC patients. There were no significant differences among screened versus unscreened patients after PIC with respect to age, sex, race, or ethnicity (p>0.05). Overall, screening improved pre-PIC to post-PIC (52% vs. 88%, p<0.01) and the percentage of patients who screened positively also increased after PIC (8% vs. 23%, p<0.01). Brief intervention was unchanged (83% vs. 81%, p=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PIC is a novel tool that demonstrated improved alcohol screening and referral. It improved compliance with SBIRT and reduced implicit bias in the population screened. Utilization of a PIC is easily translatable to other centers and could become a national standard to advance performance improvement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e001517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:筛查、简单干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT)已证明可减少高达 50% 的酒精相关外伤,并且是美国外科学院规定的创伤中心认证标准。虽然之前已对 SBIRT 的有效性进行过调查,但在创伤环境中的最佳实施方法还没有进行过调查。我们试图通过将筛查整合到晨间报告时部署的绩效改进核对表 (PIC) 中来提高 SBIRT 的合规性。我们假设 PIC 将为改进酒精筛查/干预建立一个可自我维持的模式:这是一项回顾性研究,比较了 2023 年 1 月 PIC 实施前(2022 年 1 月至 5 月)和 PIC 实施后(2023 年 1 月至 5 月)的外伤患者。主要结果是 SBIRT 的表现。如果血液中酒精含量大于 80 毫克/分升,PIC 将提示酒精干预专家会诊:PIC前有705名患者,PIC后有840名患者。PIC 前未接受筛查的患者更多没有保险(13% 对 25%,P0.05)。总体而言,PIC 前与 PIC 后的筛查率有所提高(52% 对 88%,P=0.05):PIC 是一种新颖的工具,它改善了酒精筛查和转诊。它提高了 SBIRT 的依从性,减少了筛查人群中的隐性偏见。PIC 的使用很容易推广到其他中心,并可成为推动绩效改进的国家标准:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of a novel daily performance improvement checklist (PIC) improves alcohol screening and intervention compliance in trauma.

Introduction: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) has demonstrated up to 50% reduction in alcohol-related traumatic injury and is mandated by the American College of Surgeons for trauma center accreditation. While SBIRT effectiveness has been previously investigated, optimal implementation in the trauma setting has not. We sought to improve SBIRT compliance through integration of screening into a performance improvement checklist (PIC) deployed during morning report. We hypothesized that PIC would establish a self-sustaining model for improved alcohol screening/intervention.

Methods: This was a retrospective study comparing trauma patients pre-PIC (January-May 2022) to post-PIC (January-May 2023) after PIC implementation in January 2023. The primary outcome was SBIRT performance. The PIC prompted alcohol intervention specialist consultation if blood alcohol content >80 mg/dL, <21 years old, or Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ≥8. Significance was determined if p<0.05.

Results: There were 705 pre-PIC and 840 post-PIC patients. Pre-PIC unscreened patients were more often uninsured (13% vs. 25%, p<0.01) and black (8% vs. 14%, p=0.02) compared with screened pre-PIC patients. There were no significant differences among screened versus unscreened patients after PIC with respect to age, sex, race, or ethnicity (p>0.05). Overall, screening improved pre-PIC to post-PIC (52% vs. 88%, p<0.01) and the percentage of patients who screened positively also increased after PIC (8% vs. 23%, p<0.01). Brief intervention was unchanged (83% vs. 81%, p=1).

Conclusion: The PIC is a novel tool that demonstrated improved alcohol screening and referral. It improved compliance with SBIRT and reduced implicit bias in the population screened. Utilization of a PIC is easily translatable to other centers and could become a national standard to advance performance improvement.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential new treatment for inferior vena cava injury using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation applying flow diversion effect. Endovascular control of ongoing pelvic hemorrhage after intraoperative arterial shunting and venous ligation in peripheral vascular trauma. We do it the same way every time! Eliminating disparities in trauma care. Vape grenade: a patient with maxillofacial injuries with C1-C2 fracture secondary to electronic cigarette blast injury. Early identification of respiratory decompensation among older adults with rib fractures: a sound solution for fragile ribs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1