为俄亥俄州耳鼻喉科医生的执业地点模拟医生培训的重要性。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1515/jom-2024-0035
Samuel Borgemenke, D'Nair Newsom, Patrick Scheatzle, Nicholas Durstock, Elizabeth A Beverly
{"title":"为俄亥俄州耳鼻喉科医生的执业地点模拟医生培训的重要性。","authors":"Samuel Borgemenke, D'Nair Newsom, Patrick Scheatzle, Nicholas Durstock, Elizabeth A Beverly","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia face significant healthcare accessibility challenges, with the Midwest offering a lower density of healthcare providers compared to coastal regions. Specifically, underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia are disadvantaged in otolaryngology care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This analysis aims to identify factors that lead otolaryngologists to a respective practice location, and if any of that influence comes from where otolaryngologists completed their medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proportion of otolaryngologists who performed medical school, residency, and/or fellowship in Ohio was analyzed utilizing a three-sample test for equality. Multivariate logistic regression and Pearson prediction models were produced to analyze the impact of performing medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in Ohio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Going to medical school in Ohio significantly increases the odds of going to an otolaryngology residency in the state (p<0.001). Moreover, between medical school and residency, medical school was a significantly better predictor of otolaryngologists practicing in Appalachia (Δ Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC]>2) and southeast Ohio (ΔBIC>10). Medical school in state was also a better predictor of percent rural and median household income than residency (ΔBIC>10). The multivariate model of medical school and residency was significantly better than either predictor alone for the population (ΔBIC>2). All models predicting percent rural were significantly improved with the addition of a Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) degree (ΔBIC>10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Where physicians complete their medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in state has a significant impact on predicting their future place of practice. This study found that the location of such training has a positive predictive nature as to whether that physician will practice in a rural and underserved area in the future. Notably, the addition of being licensed as a DO also increased the probability of that physician practicing in a rural area.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the importance of physician training in practice location for Ohio otolaryngologists.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Borgemenke, D'Nair Newsom, Patrick Scheatzle, Nicholas Durstock, Elizabeth A Beverly\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2024-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia face significant healthcare accessibility challenges, with the Midwest offering a lower density of healthcare providers compared to coastal regions. Specifically, underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia are disadvantaged in otolaryngology care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This analysis aims to identify factors that lead otolaryngologists to a respective practice location, and if any of that influence comes from where otolaryngologists completed their medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proportion of otolaryngologists who performed medical school, residency, and/or fellowship in Ohio was analyzed utilizing a three-sample test for equality. Multivariate logistic regression and Pearson prediction models were produced to analyze the impact of performing medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in Ohio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Going to medical school in Ohio significantly increases the odds of going to an otolaryngology residency in the state (p<0.001). Moreover, between medical school and residency, medical school was a significantly better predictor of otolaryngologists practicing in Appalachia (Δ Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC]>2) and southeast Ohio (ΔBIC>10). Medical school in state was also a better predictor of percent rural and median household income than residency (ΔBIC>10). The multivariate model of medical school and residency was significantly better than either predictor alone for the population (ΔBIC>2). All models predicting percent rural were significantly improved with the addition of a Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) degree (ΔBIC>10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Where physicians complete their medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in state has a significant impact on predicting their future place of practice. This study found that the location of such training has a positive predictive nature as to whether that physician will practice in a rural and underserved area in the future. Notably, the addition of being licensed as a DO also increased the probability of that physician practicing in a rural area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:俄亥俄州东南部和阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务不足的社区面临着医疗服务可及性方面的巨大挑战,与沿海地区相比,中西部地区的医疗服务提供者密度较低。具体而言,俄亥俄州东南部和阿巴拉契亚地区医疗服务不足的社区在耳鼻喉科医疗服务方面处于不利地位:本分析旨在确定导致耳鼻喉科医生选择各自执业地点的因素,以及这些因素是否来自耳鼻喉科医生完成医学教育的地点:方法: 通过三样本平等检验分析了在俄亥俄州完成医学院、住院医师培训和/或研究员培训的耳鼻喉科医生的比例。制作了多变量逻辑回归和皮尔逊预测模型,以分析在俄亥俄州接受医学培训(医学院、住院医师培训和研究员培训)的影响:结果:在俄亥俄州就读医学院会显著增加在该州(p2)和俄亥俄州东南部(ΔBIC>10)就读耳鼻喉科住院医师的几率。与住院医生相比,该州的医学院也能更好地预测农村人口比例和家庭收入中位数(ΔBIC>10)。医学院和住院医生的多变量模型对人口的预测效果明显优于单独的任何一个预测因子(ΔBIC>2)。所有预测农村人口比例的模型在加入整骨疗法博士(DO)学位后都有明显改善(ΔBIC>10):结论:医生在哪个州完成医学培训(医学院、住院医师培训和研究员培训)对预测他们未来的执业地点有重要影响。本研究发现,培训地点对医生未来是否会在农村和医疗服务不足的地区执业具有积极的预测作用。值得注意的是,获得执业医师执照也增加了医生在农村地区执业的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling the importance of physician training in practice location for Ohio otolaryngologists.

Context: Underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia face significant healthcare accessibility challenges, with the Midwest offering a lower density of healthcare providers compared to coastal regions. Specifically, underserved communities in southeastern Ohio and Appalachia are disadvantaged in otolaryngology care.

Objectives: This analysis aims to identify factors that lead otolaryngologists to a respective practice location, and if any of that influence comes from where otolaryngologists completed their medical education.

Methods: The proportion of otolaryngologists who performed medical school, residency, and/or fellowship in Ohio was analyzed utilizing a three-sample test for equality. Multivariate logistic regression and Pearson prediction models were produced to analyze the impact of performing medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in Ohio.

Results: Going to medical school in Ohio significantly increases the odds of going to an otolaryngology residency in the state (p<0.001). Moreover, between medical school and residency, medical school was a significantly better predictor of otolaryngologists practicing in Appalachia (Δ Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC]>2) and southeast Ohio (ΔBIC>10). Medical school in state was also a better predictor of percent rural and median household income than residency (ΔBIC>10). The multivariate model of medical school and residency was significantly better than either predictor alone for the population (ΔBIC>2). All models predicting percent rural were significantly improved with the addition of a Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) degree (ΔBIC>10).

Conclusions: Where physicians complete their medical training (medical school, residency, and fellowship) in state has a significant impact on predicting their future place of practice. This study found that the location of such training has a positive predictive nature as to whether that physician will practice in a rural and underserved area in the future. Notably, the addition of being licensed as a DO also increased the probability of that physician practicing in a rural area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
The role of osteopathic manipulative treatment for dystonia: a literature review. Improving peripheral artery disease screening and treatment: a screening, diagnosis, and treatment tool for use across multiple care settings. Effects of the Strong Hearts program at two years post program completion. 2024 AOA Research Abstracts and Student Poster Competition. Perspectives of osteopathic medical students on preclinical urology exposure: a single institution cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1