鼻胃管固定方法评估:粘连、移位和皮肤完整性。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.7411.4365
Lucia Ingridy Farias Thorpe, Jabiael Carneiro da Silva, Renato Barros Moraes, Nataly da Silva Gonçalves, Alex do Nascimento Alves, Isabel Cristina Ramos Vieira Santos
{"title":"鼻胃管固定方法评估:粘连、移位和皮肤完整性。","authors":"Lucia Ingridy Farias Thorpe, Jabiael Carneiro da Silva, Renato Barros Moraes, Nataly da Silva Gonçalves, Alex do Nascimento Alves, Isabel Cristina Ramos Vieira Santos","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.7411.4365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate three methods of nasogastric tube fixation in terms of adhesion, displacement and skin integrity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>ex vivo study, with a sample of 30 experimental noses (10 for each type of fixation), developed with porcine skin, based on the average measurements of the human nose, in which 14-gauge polyvinyl chloride probes were inserted and 2 methods of fixation with adhesive tape (Fixation A and B) and one with an industrial device (Fixation C) were used. Each group was exposed to traction of 50, 100 and 500g sequentially over 12 and 24 hours, testing: adhesion capacity, probe displacement and skin integrity. The Chi-square test of independence was calculated for nominal variables and Student's t-tests and analysis of variance (p< 0.05) for rational variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>fixation B showed lower adhesion capacity (p <0.001) when compared to the other two fixations. A mean displacement of 52.17 mm was observed in the probes fixed by methods A and B and a greater occurrence of lesions associated with fixations A and C (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the results show complications related to the fixations: lack of adhesion, displacement of the probe and skin lesions, drawing attention to the complexity of the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of nasogastric tube fixation methods: adhesion, displacement and skin integrity.\",\"authors\":\"Lucia Ingridy Farias Thorpe, Jabiael Carneiro da Silva, Renato Barros Moraes, Nataly da Silva Gonçalves, Alex do Nascimento Alves, Isabel Cristina Ramos Vieira Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1518-8345.7411.4365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate three methods of nasogastric tube fixation in terms of adhesion, displacement and skin integrity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>ex vivo study, with a sample of 30 experimental noses (10 for each type of fixation), developed with porcine skin, based on the average measurements of the human nose, in which 14-gauge polyvinyl chloride probes were inserted and 2 methods of fixation with adhesive tape (Fixation A and B) and one with an industrial device (Fixation C) were used. Each group was exposed to traction of 50, 100 and 500g sequentially over 12 and 24 hours, testing: adhesion capacity, probe displacement and skin integrity. The Chi-square test of independence was calculated for nominal variables and Student's t-tests and analysis of variance (p< 0.05) for rational variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>fixation B showed lower adhesion capacity (p <0.001) when compared to the other two fixations. A mean displacement of 52.17 mm was observed in the probes fixed by methods A and B and a greater occurrence of lesions associated with fixations A and C (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the results show complications related to the fixations: lack of adhesion, displacement of the probe and skin lesions, drawing attention to the complexity of the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421525/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7411.4365\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7411.4365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估三种鼻胃管固定方法的粘附力、移位和皮肤完整性。方法:体外研究,样本为 30 个实验鼻(每种固定方法 10 个),根据人鼻的平均测量值,用猪皮制作,其中插入 14 号聚氯乙烯探针,使用两种胶带固定方法(固定方法 A 和 B)和一种工业装置固定方法(固定方法 C)。每组在 12 小时和 24 小时内依次承受 50、100 和 500 克的牵引力,测试:粘附能力、探针位移和皮肤完整性。结果:固定装置 B 的粘附能力较低(p 结论:结果显示了与固定装置有关的并发症:缺乏粘附力、探针移位和皮肤损伤,提请注意手术的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of nasogastric tube fixation methods: adhesion, displacement and skin integrity.

Objective: to evaluate three methods of nasogastric tube fixation in terms of adhesion, displacement and skin integrity.

Method: ex vivo study, with a sample of 30 experimental noses (10 for each type of fixation), developed with porcine skin, based on the average measurements of the human nose, in which 14-gauge polyvinyl chloride probes were inserted and 2 methods of fixation with adhesive tape (Fixation A and B) and one with an industrial device (Fixation C) were used. Each group was exposed to traction of 50, 100 and 500g sequentially over 12 and 24 hours, testing: adhesion capacity, probe displacement and skin integrity. The Chi-square test of independence was calculated for nominal variables and Student's t-tests and analysis of variance (p< 0.05) for rational variables.

Results: fixation B showed lower adhesion capacity (p <0.001) when compared to the other two fixations. A mean displacement of 52.17 mm was observed in the probes fixed by methods A and B and a greater occurrence of lesions associated with fixations A and C (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: the results show complications related to the fixations: lack of adhesion, displacement of the probe and skin lesions, drawing attention to the complexity of the procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
期刊最新文献
Promoting mental health in the workplace: web software development and validation. Aerospace nurses' competencies in disaster situations: a scoping review. Complications in the use of peripherally inserted central catheter associated with peripheral intravenous therapy: retrospective cohort. Enhancing early bonding between mothers and preterm infants: findings from a Multicentre Qualitative Study of Nurses. Epidemic curves and the profile of patients hospitalized by COVID-19 in a border region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1