实现海上风电场退役的整体性、参与性和适应性治理

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Marine Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106413
{"title":"实现海上风电场退役的整体性、参与性和适应性治理","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The earliest generation of offshore wind farms across Europe soon approach their end-of-life phase. Recent academic and societal attention has centred on the ‘artificial reef effects’ of offshore wind farms, triggering concerns regarding how to appropriately approach the decommissioning of the monopiles. Wind turbines and their foundations are jurisdictionally expected to be fully removed. Partial decommissioning, in which structures are left in place, is raised as a potential alternative that is anticipated to have ecological benefits over full decommissioning. Despite a strong growing scientific interest in OWF decommissioning, as well as an increasing public debate on the issue, a comprehensive approach to decommissioning decision-making has not yet landed in the actual regulatory processes. This gap is strikingly apparent in the Netherlands, where two OWFs will be decommissioned in the coming years. This paper explores where stakeholders believe the current bottlenecks exist, and how progress can be made towards decisive but inclusive decision-making. Based on individual co-creation sessions with concerned stakeholders, it offers multiple recommendations, including broadly supported criteria to be considered when comparing decommissioning alternatives, as well as underlying perceptions or patterns to be recognised, such as liability concerns, ecosystem valuation, lock-in and path dependency. The discussions and conclusions from this paper can be applied in all countries where decommissioning of OWFs is imminent, and thereby be used as a guide towards inclusive, adaptive and holistic governance within marine management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards holistic, participative and adaptable governance for offshore wind farm decommissioning\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The earliest generation of offshore wind farms across Europe soon approach their end-of-life phase. Recent academic and societal attention has centred on the ‘artificial reef effects’ of offshore wind farms, triggering concerns regarding how to appropriately approach the decommissioning of the monopiles. Wind turbines and their foundations are jurisdictionally expected to be fully removed. Partial decommissioning, in which structures are left in place, is raised as a potential alternative that is anticipated to have ecological benefits over full decommissioning. Despite a strong growing scientific interest in OWF decommissioning, as well as an increasing public debate on the issue, a comprehensive approach to decommissioning decision-making has not yet landed in the actual regulatory processes. This gap is strikingly apparent in the Netherlands, where two OWFs will be decommissioned in the coming years. This paper explores where stakeholders believe the current bottlenecks exist, and how progress can be made towards decisive but inclusive decision-making. Based on individual co-creation sessions with concerned stakeholders, it offers multiple recommendations, including broadly supported criteria to be considered when comparing decommissioning alternatives, as well as underlying perceptions or patterns to be recognised, such as liability concerns, ecosystem valuation, lock-in and path dependency. The discussions and conclusions from this paper can be applied in all countries where decommissioning of OWFs is imminent, and thereby be used as a guide towards inclusive, adaptive and holistic governance within marine management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24004111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲最早一代的海上风电场很快就要进入报废阶段。最近,学术界和社会关注的焦点是海上风电场的 "人工暗礁效应",这引发了人们对如何妥善处理单桩退役问题的担忧。根据法律规定,风力涡轮机及其基础应全部拆除。部分退役,即结构留在原地,被认为是一种潜在的替代方法,预计比完全退役更有利于生态。尽管科学界对 OWF 退役的兴趣与日俱增,公众对这一问题的讨论也越来越多,但在实际监管过程中,还没有一个全面的退役决策方法。这一差距在荷兰表现得尤为明显,荷兰将在未来几年内退役两座有轨电车设施。本文探讨了利益相关者认为目前存在的瓶颈所在,以及如何才能在果断但具有包容性的决策方面取得进展。在与相关利益相关者进行个别共创会议的基础上,本文提出了多项建议,包括在比较退役替代方案时应考虑的得到广泛支持的标准,以及应认识到的潜在观念或模式,如责任问题、生态系统估值、锁定和路径依赖。本文的讨论和结论可应用于即将退役开放式海洋设施的所有国家,从而为海洋管理中的包容性、适应性和整体性治理提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards holistic, participative and adaptable governance for offshore wind farm decommissioning
The earliest generation of offshore wind farms across Europe soon approach their end-of-life phase. Recent academic and societal attention has centred on the ‘artificial reef effects’ of offshore wind farms, triggering concerns regarding how to appropriately approach the decommissioning of the monopiles. Wind turbines and their foundations are jurisdictionally expected to be fully removed. Partial decommissioning, in which structures are left in place, is raised as a potential alternative that is anticipated to have ecological benefits over full decommissioning. Despite a strong growing scientific interest in OWF decommissioning, as well as an increasing public debate on the issue, a comprehensive approach to decommissioning decision-making has not yet landed in the actual regulatory processes. This gap is strikingly apparent in the Netherlands, where two OWFs will be decommissioned in the coming years. This paper explores where stakeholders believe the current bottlenecks exist, and how progress can be made towards decisive but inclusive decision-making. Based on individual co-creation sessions with concerned stakeholders, it offers multiple recommendations, including broadly supported criteria to be considered when comparing decommissioning alternatives, as well as underlying perceptions or patterns to be recognised, such as liability concerns, ecosystem valuation, lock-in and path dependency. The discussions and conclusions from this paper can be applied in all countries where decommissioning of OWFs is imminent, and thereby be used as a guide towards inclusive, adaptive and holistic governance within marine management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
期刊最新文献
Local perceptions of marine conservation aquaculture for the restoration of native Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Downeast, Maine The protection of submarine cables in Southeast Asia: The security gap and challenges and opportunities for regional cooperation Ensuring compliance with Antarctic environmental protection through inspections: Problems and prospects Coastal communities' perceptions on coastal erosion and the protective role of seagrass meadows in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania On the provisions of the BBNJ Agreement addressing the impacts of climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1