Jeffrey G. Scott , Oshneil S. Baker , Anastacia E. Dressel , Rachel H. Norris , Edwin R. Burgess IV
{"title":"家蝇对氟乐灵抗性的角质层渗透减少机制的分离和表征","authors":"Jeffrey G. Scott , Oshneil S. Baker , Anastacia E. Dressel , Rachel H. Norris , Edwin R. Burgess IV","doi":"10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decreased cuticular penetration has been documented as a mechanism of resistance in several insects, yet this mechanism remains poorly understood. Levels of resistance conferred, effects of the physicochemical properties on the manifestation of resistance and the effects of different routes of exposure are largely unknown. We recently selected a strain (FlurR) of house fly that was >11,000-fold resistance to fluralaner, and decreased cuticular penetration was one of the mechanisms of resistance (<span><span>Norris et al., 2023</span></span>). We sought to isolate the decreased penetration mechanism from FlurR into the background of the susceptible aabys strain, and to characterize the protection it conferred to fluralaner and other insecticides. We successfully isolated the decreased penetration mechanism and found that it conferred 7.1-fold resistance to fluralaner, and 1.4- to 4.9-fold cross-resistance to five other insecticides by topical application. Neither mass, metabolic lability, vapor pressure, nor logP explained the differences in the resistance ratios. The mechanism also conferred cross resistance by residual and feeding exposure, although at reduced levels compared to topical application. Remaining data gaps in our understanding of this mechanism are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19828,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 106154"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation and characterization of the decreased cuticular penetration mechanism of fluralaner resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey G. Scott , Oshneil S. Baker , Anastacia E. Dressel , Rachel H. Norris , Edwin R. Burgess IV\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Decreased cuticular penetration has been documented as a mechanism of resistance in several insects, yet this mechanism remains poorly understood. Levels of resistance conferred, effects of the physicochemical properties on the manifestation of resistance and the effects of different routes of exposure are largely unknown. We recently selected a strain (FlurR) of house fly that was >11,000-fold resistance to fluralaner, and decreased cuticular penetration was one of the mechanisms of resistance (<span><span>Norris et al., 2023</span></span>). We sought to isolate the decreased penetration mechanism from FlurR into the background of the susceptible aabys strain, and to characterize the protection it conferred to fluralaner and other insecticides. We successfully isolated the decreased penetration mechanism and found that it conferred 7.1-fold resistance to fluralaner, and 1.4- to 4.9-fold cross-resistance to five other insecticides by topical application. Neither mass, metabolic lability, vapor pressure, nor logP explained the differences in the resistance ratios. The mechanism also conferred cross resistance by residual and feeding exposure, although at reduced levels compared to topical application. Remaining data gaps in our understanding of this mechanism are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048357524003870\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048357524003870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Isolation and characterization of the decreased cuticular penetration mechanism of fluralaner resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica
Decreased cuticular penetration has been documented as a mechanism of resistance in several insects, yet this mechanism remains poorly understood. Levels of resistance conferred, effects of the physicochemical properties on the manifestation of resistance and the effects of different routes of exposure are largely unknown. We recently selected a strain (FlurR) of house fly that was >11,000-fold resistance to fluralaner, and decreased cuticular penetration was one of the mechanisms of resistance (Norris et al., 2023). We sought to isolate the decreased penetration mechanism from FlurR into the background of the susceptible aabys strain, and to characterize the protection it conferred to fluralaner and other insecticides. We successfully isolated the decreased penetration mechanism and found that it conferred 7.1-fold resistance to fluralaner, and 1.4- to 4.9-fold cross-resistance to five other insecticides by topical application. Neither mass, metabolic lability, vapor pressure, nor logP explained the differences in the resistance ratios. The mechanism also conferred cross resistance by residual and feeding exposure, although at reduced levels compared to topical application. Remaining data gaps in our understanding of this mechanism are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology publishes original scientific articles pertaining to the mode of action of plant protection agents such as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and similar compounds, including nonlethal pest control agents, biosynthesis of pheromones, hormones, and plant resistance agents. Manuscripts may include a biochemical, physiological, or molecular study for an understanding of comparative toxicology or selective toxicity of both target and nontarget organisms. Particular interest will be given to studies on the molecular biology of pest control, toxicology, and pesticide resistance.
Research Areas Emphasized Include the Biochemistry and Physiology of:
• Comparative toxicity
• Mode of action
• Pathophysiology
• Plant growth regulators
• Resistance
• Other effects of pesticides on both parasites and hosts.