{"title":"政治风险对新兴市场风险溢价和风险调整后回报的影响","authors":"Ralph Sonenshine, Aya Aboulhosn","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers have observed the political risk, sign paradox whereby a decrease in political risk is associated with an increase in stock market returns. This apparent contradiction may be driven by a few political risk factors or perhaps certain emerging market (EM) countries<em>.</em> This paper examines this issue by assessing how key political risk components impact equity risk premiums and risk adjusted returns among EM countries. Using monthly stock market return data for 28 EM countries from 2000 to 2019, we segment countries into high and low political risk groups to explore heterogeneous effects. We find that improvements in political risk increase risk adjusted returns by lowering the volatility of returns. Differences were also found between EM countries with improvements in government stability leading to higher risk adjusted returns among high political risk EM countries. In contrast for low political risk countries, democracy was found to have a negative effect on equity premiums, while law and order and investment profile have a positive impact. Finally, our results suggest key political risk subcomponents, such as investment profile and corruption, impact risk adjusted returns during times of financial crisis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 102573"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of political risk on emerging market risk premiums and risk adjusted returns\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Sonenshine, Aya Aboulhosn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Researchers have observed the political risk, sign paradox whereby a decrease in political risk is associated with an increase in stock market returns. This apparent contradiction may be driven by a few political risk factors or perhaps certain emerging market (EM) countries<em>.</em> This paper examines this issue by assessing how key political risk components impact equity risk premiums and risk adjusted returns among EM countries. Using monthly stock market return data for 28 EM countries from 2000 to 2019, we segment countries into high and low political risk groups to explore heterogeneous effects. We find that improvements in political risk increase risk adjusted returns by lowering the volatility of returns. Differences were also found between EM countries with improvements in government stability leading to higher risk adjusted returns among high political risk EM countries. In contrast for low political risk countries, democracy was found to have a negative effect on equity premiums, while law and order and investment profile have a positive impact. Finally, our results suggest key political risk subcomponents, such as investment profile and corruption, impact risk adjusted returns during times of financial crisis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of political risk on emerging market risk premiums and risk adjusted returns
Researchers have observed the political risk, sign paradox whereby a decrease in political risk is associated with an increase in stock market returns. This apparent contradiction may be driven by a few political risk factors or perhaps certain emerging market (EM) countries. This paper examines this issue by assessing how key political risk components impact equity risk premiums and risk adjusted returns among EM countries. Using monthly stock market return data for 28 EM countries from 2000 to 2019, we segment countries into high and low political risk groups to explore heterogeneous effects. We find that improvements in political risk increase risk adjusted returns by lowering the volatility of returns. Differences were also found between EM countries with improvements in government stability leading to higher risk adjusted returns among high political risk EM countries. In contrast for low political risk countries, democracy was found to have a negative effect on equity premiums, while law and order and investment profile have a positive impact. Finally, our results suggest key political risk subcomponents, such as investment profile and corruption, impact risk adjusted returns during times of financial crisis.
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance