稳定与增长公约》的改革:对各国政府而言,哪些变化?

Séverine Menguy
{"title":"稳定与增长公约》的改革:对各国政府而言,哪些变化?","authors":"Séverine Menguy","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2020, in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact were temporarily suspended in the European Union. Nevertheless, the European Council and the European Parliament reached an agreement for the reactivation of these rules in 2024. A simple analytical modeling then shows that the empirical implications of the new rules suggested for a reformed Stability and Growth Pact would not be very different from those derived from the rules previously applied. Regarding highly indebted countries, the new debt sustainability safeguard of the reformed SGP could be slightly less binding than the previous rule of the Six Pack requiring to reduce 1/20th of the excess of the public debt each year. However, this criterion as well as those related to the structural budget deficit would not change much the conclusions and the recommendations of the reformed Stability and Growth Pact in comparison with former European fiscal rules. So, reactivated fiscal rules should remain difficult to comply with for many European countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact: Which changes for the governments?\",\"authors\":\"Séverine Menguy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jge.2024.100120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In 2020, in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact were temporarily suspended in the European Union. Nevertheless, the European Council and the European Parliament reached an agreement for the reactivation of these rules in 2024. A simple analytical modeling then shows that the empirical implications of the new rules suggested for a reformed Stability and Growth Pact would not be very different from those derived from the rules previously applied. Regarding highly indebted countries, the new debt sustainability safeguard of the reformed SGP could be slightly less binding than the previous rule of the Six Pack requiring to reduce 1/20th of the excess of the public debt each year. However, this criterion as well as those related to the structural budget deficit would not change much the conclusions and the recommendations of the reformed Stability and Growth Pact in comparison with former European fiscal rules. So, reactivated fiscal rules should remain difficult to comply with for many European countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319324000247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319324000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020 年,在 COVID-19 健康危机的背景下,欧盟暂时中止了《稳定与增长公约》的规则。然而,欧洲理事会和欧洲议会达成协议,将于 2024 年重新启动这些规则。一个简单的分析模型显示,改革后的《稳定与增长公约》所建议的新规则的经验影响与之前适用的规则并无太大区别。就重债国而言,改革后的《稳定与增长公约》新的债务可持续性保障措施的约束力可能略低于之前的 "六国包案 "规则,即要求每年减少公共债务超额部分的 1/20。不过,与以前的欧洲财政规则相比,这一标准以及与结构性预算赤字有关的标准不会对改革后的《稳定与增长公约》的结论和建议产生太大的影响。因此,对许多欧洲国家来说,重新启动的财政规则仍然难以遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact: Which changes for the governments?
In 2020, in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact were temporarily suspended in the European Union. Nevertheless, the European Council and the European Parliament reached an agreement for the reactivation of these rules in 2024. A simple analytical modeling then shows that the empirical implications of the new rules suggested for a reformed Stability and Growth Pact would not be very different from those derived from the rules previously applied. Regarding highly indebted countries, the new debt sustainability safeguard of the reformed SGP could be slightly less binding than the previous rule of the Six Pack requiring to reduce 1/20th of the excess of the public debt each year. However, this criterion as well as those related to the structural budget deficit would not change much the conclusions and the recommendations of the reformed Stability and Growth Pact in comparison with former European fiscal rules. So, reactivated fiscal rules should remain difficult to comply with for many European countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The contributions of foreign aid and natural resource wealth to democratic institutions: Evidence from over 40 years of sub-Sahara Africa's history Editor's note: Market-preserving government, global value chains, trade remedies, center-state transfers, and foreign aid. The nature of market-preserving government Trade remedy measures and their effects on industry performance, and implicit government intentions: Changes in revealed comparative advantage indices in China, India, and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1