在 CMIP6 历史模拟中,南卡斯卡迪亚地区冬季极端低温期间存在严重低温偏差

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1029/2024JD041483
M. H. Rogers, G. Mauger, N. Cristea
{"title":"在 CMIP6 历史模拟中,南卡斯卡迪亚地区冬季极端低温期间存在严重低温偏差","authors":"M. H. Rogers,&nbsp;G. Mauger,&nbsp;N. Cristea","doi":"10.1029/2024JD041483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global climate models often simulate atmospheric conditions incorrectly due to their coarse grid resolution, flaws in their dynamics, and biases resulting from parameterization schemes. Here we document a bias in the magnitude and extent of minimum temperature extremes in the CMIP6 model ensemble, relative to ERA5. The bias is present in the southern Cascadia region (i.e., Pacific Northwestern United States and southwestern British Columbia, Canada, spanning from the coast to the Rocky Mountains), with some models showing a bias magnitude in excess of −10°C in the first percentile of daily winter minimum temperature. The sea level pressure pattern for these events is similar in CMIP6 models and ERA5, showing high anomalies in the Northeast Pacific that are indicative of an atmospheric blocking pattern and consequently more northerly flow. Though this atmospheric blocking pattern is typically concurrent with cold winter temperatures across much of North America, Rocky and Cascade mountain ranges prevent the cold air from reaching the southern Cascadia region as confirmed by the observations and reanalysis. Our results suggest that the bias in CMIP6 minimum temperatures is a result of unresolved topography in the Rockies and Cascade mountain ranges, such that the terrain does not adequately block cold air advection from reaching the southern Cascadia region.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD041483","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substantial Cold Bias During Wintertime Cold Extremes in the Southern Cascadia Region in Historical CMIP6 Simulations\",\"authors\":\"M. H. Rogers,&nbsp;G. Mauger,&nbsp;N. Cristea\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD041483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Global climate models often simulate atmospheric conditions incorrectly due to their coarse grid resolution, flaws in their dynamics, and biases resulting from parameterization schemes. Here we document a bias in the magnitude and extent of minimum temperature extremes in the CMIP6 model ensemble, relative to ERA5. The bias is present in the southern Cascadia region (i.e., Pacific Northwestern United States and southwestern British Columbia, Canada, spanning from the coast to the Rocky Mountains), with some models showing a bias magnitude in excess of −10°C in the first percentile of daily winter minimum temperature. The sea level pressure pattern for these events is similar in CMIP6 models and ERA5, showing high anomalies in the Northeast Pacific that are indicative of an atmospheric blocking pattern and consequently more northerly flow. Though this atmospheric blocking pattern is typically concurrent with cold winter temperatures across much of North America, Rocky and Cascade mountain ranges prevent the cold air from reaching the southern Cascadia region as confirmed by the observations and reanalysis. Our results suggest that the bias in CMIP6 minimum temperatures is a result of unresolved topography in the Rockies and Cascade mountain ranges, such that the terrain does not adequately block cold air advection from reaching the southern Cascadia region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JD041483\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041483\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球气候模式由于其粗网格分辨率、动力学缺陷以及参数化方案导致的偏差,经常会错误地模拟大气条件。与ERA5相比,CMIP6模式集合中极端最低气温的幅度和范围存在偏差。这种偏差出现在南卡斯卡迪亚地区(即美国西北太平洋和加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省西南部,从海岸到落基山脉),一些模式显示冬季日最低气温第一百分位数的偏差幅度超过-10°C。在 CMIP6 模式和ERA5 模式中,这些事件的海平面气压模式相似,都显示东北太平洋的高异常,表明大气阻塞模式,从而导致更偏北的气流。虽然这种大气阻塞模式通常与北美大部分地区冬季的低温同时出现,但落基山脉和卡斯卡特山脉阻止了冷空气到达卡斯卡迪亚南部地区,这一点已被观测和再分析所证实。我们的研究结果表明,CMIP6 最低气温的偏差是由于落基山脉和喀斯喀特山脉的地形没有得到解决,因此地形没有充分阻挡冷空气平流到达卡斯卡迪亚南部地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Substantial Cold Bias During Wintertime Cold Extremes in the Southern Cascadia Region in Historical CMIP6 Simulations

Global climate models often simulate atmospheric conditions incorrectly due to their coarse grid resolution, flaws in their dynamics, and biases resulting from parameterization schemes. Here we document a bias in the magnitude and extent of minimum temperature extremes in the CMIP6 model ensemble, relative to ERA5. The bias is present in the southern Cascadia region (i.e., Pacific Northwestern United States and southwestern British Columbia, Canada, spanning from the coast to the Rocky Mountains), with some models showing a bias magnitude in excess of −10°C in the first percentile of daily winter minimum temperature. The sea level pressure pattern for these events is similar in CMIP6 models and ERA5, showing high anomalies in the Northeast Pacific that are indicative of an atmospheric blocking pattern and consequently more northerly flow. Though this atmospheric blocking pattern is typically concurrent with cold winter temperatures across much of North America, Rocky and Cascade mountain ranges prevent the cold air from reaching the southern Cascadia region as confirmed by the observations and reanalysis. Our results suggest that the bias in CMIP6 minimum temperatures is a result of unresolved topography in the Rockies and Cascade mountain ranges, such that the terrain does not adequately block cold air advection from reaching the southern Cascadia region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Local and Remote Effects of the Sub-Grid Turbulent Orographic Form Drag on the Summer Monsoon Precipitation Over Eastern China Atmospheric Microplastics Emission Source Potentials and Deposition Patterns in Semi-Arid Croplands of Northern China Evaluation of the Representation of Raindrop Self-Collection and Breakup in Two-Moment Bulk Models Using a Multifrequency Radar Retrieval Distinct Radiative and Chemical Impacts Between the Equatorial and Northern Extratropical Volcanic Injections Diagnosing Atmospheric Heating Rate Changes Using Radiative Kernels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1