Ann Carol Braswell, Madeline Bald, Gabriela Fonseca, Edgar Soto, Hua Amanda Fang, Prasanth Patcha
{"title":"COVID-19 面罩规定对乳房切除术后组织扩张并发症发生率的影响。","authors":"Ann Carol Braswell, Madeline Bald, Gabriela Fonseca, Edgar Soto, Hua Amanda Fang, Prasanth Patcha","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tissue expansion is a commonly used breast reconstructive strategy. Although the procedure is regarded as safe, tissue expander to implant-based breast reconstruction is reported to have the highest rates of postoperative infection among plastic surgery operations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks were required at all hospital facilities at our institution. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of COVID-19 mask mandate on in-office breast tissue expansion procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review was completed on all patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral tissue expansion following mastectomy at a single institution in 2017 (prior to the COVID-19 mask mandate) and 2021 (following implementation of the mandate). Variables included were demographics, procedure information, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 118 patients in the premandate group and 147 patients in the postmandate group. There was no difference in age, body mass index, smoking status, or diabetes mellitus between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). More patients in the postmandate group underwent bilateral reconstruction as opposed to unilateral when compared with the premandate group (70.7% vs 55.9%, P = 0.014). There were no differences in major complication rate (26.3% vs 30.6%, P = 0.495) or minor complication rate 30.5% vs 26.5%, P = 0.495) between the pre-mask and post-mask mandate groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that the use of face masks did not play a significant role in complication rates relating to in-office tissue expansion procedures. It remains up to the discretion and comfortability of the provider if masks should be worn during the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of the COVID-19 Mask Mandate on Complication Rates in Postmastectomy Tissue Expansion.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Carol Braswell, Madeline Bald, Gabriela Fonseca, Edgar Soto, Hua Amanda Fang, Prasanth Patcha\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tissue expansion is a commonly used breast reconstructive strategy. Although the procedure is regarded as safe, tissue expander to implant-based breast reconstruction is reported to have the highest rates of postoperative infection among plastic surgery operations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks were required at all hospital facilities at our institution. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of COVID-19 mask mandate on in-office breast tissue expansion procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review was completed on all patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral tissue expansion following mastectomy at a single institution in 2017 (prior to the COVID-19 mask mandate) and 2021 (following implementation of the mandate). Variables included were demographics, procedure information, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 118 patients in the premandate group and 147 patients in the postmandate group. There was no difference in age, body mass index, smoking status, or diabetes mellitus between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). More patients in the postmandate group underwent bilateral reconstruction as opposed to unilateral when compared with the premandate group (70.7% vs 55.9%, P = 0.014). There were no differences in major complication rate (26.3% vs 30.6%, P = 0.495) or minor complication rate 30.5% vs 26.5%, P = 0.495) between the pre-mask and post-mask mandate groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that the use of face masks did not play a significant role in complication rates relating to in-office tissue expansion procedures. It remains up to the discretion and comfortability of the provider if masks should be worn during the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介组织扩张术是一种常用的乳房重建策略。尽管该手术被认为是安全的,但据报道,组织扩张器与植入物乳房重建术的术后感染率在整形外科手术中最高。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们医院的所有设施都要求佩戴口罩。本研究的目的是调查 COVID-19 口罩规定对诊室内乳房组织扩张手术的影响:方法:我们对 2017 年(COVID-19 口罩规定实施前)和 2021 年(规定实施后)在一家医院接受乳房切除术后单侧或双侧组织扩张的所有患者进行了机构审查委员会批准的回顾性审查。变量包括人口统计学、手术信息和术后结果:结果:分析结果显示,授权前组有 118 名患者,授权后组有 147 名患者。两组患者在年龄、体重指数、吸烟状况或糖尿病方面没有差异(P > 0.05)。与批准前组相比,批准后组接受双侧重建的患者多于单侧患者(70.7% vs 55.9%,P = 0.014)。戴面罩前组和戴面罩后组的主要并发症发生率(26.3% vs 30.6%,P = 0.495)和次要并发症发生率(30.5% vs 26.5%,P = 0.495)没有差异:我们的研究结果表明,面罩的使用在诊室组织扩张术的并发症发生率中并不占重要地位。是否在手术过程中佩戴口罩仍取决于医疗服务提供者的判断力和舒适度。
The Effects of the COVID-19 Mask Mandate on Complication Rates in Postmastectomy Tissue Expansion.
Introduction: Tissue expansion is a commonly used breast reconstructive strategy. Although the procedure is regarded as safe, tissue expander to implant-based breast reconstruction is reported to have the highest rates of postoperative infection among plastic surgery operations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks were required at all hospital facilities at our institution. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of COVID-19 mask mandate on in-office breast tissue expansion procedures.
Methods: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective review was completed on all patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral tissue expansion following mastectomy at a single institution in 2017 (prior to the COVID-19 mask mandate) and 2021 (following implementation of the mandate). Variables included were demographics, procedure information, and postoperative outcomes.
Results: The analysis included 118 patients in the premandate group and 147 patients in the postmandate group. There was no difference in age, body mass index, smoking status, or diabetes mellitus between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). More patients in the postmandate group underwent bilateral reconstruction as opposed to unilateral when compared with the premandate group (70.7% vs 55.9%, P = 0.014). There were no differences in major complication rate (26.3% vs 30.6%, P = 0.495) or minor complication rate 30.5% vs 26.5%, P = 0.495) between the pre-mask and post-mask mandate groups.
Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the use of face masks did not play a significant role in complication rates relating to in-office tissue expansion procedures. It remains up to the discretion and comfortability of the provider if masks should be worn during the procedure.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.