在儿童牙科中使用 PCR 指数对手动牙刷和电动牙刷进行比较。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European journal of paediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.23804/ejpd.2024.2138
F S Ludovichetti, A G Signoriello, E Trevisiol, A Gracco, E Stellini, A Zuccon, S Mazzoleni
{"title":"在儿童牙科中使用 PCR 指数对手动牙刷和电动牙刷进行比较。","authors":"F S Ludovichetti, A G Signoriello, E Trevisiol, A Gracco, E Stellini, A Zuccon, S Mazzoleni","doi":"10.23804/ejpd.2024.2138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This present study has two primary objectives: firstly, to compare the effectiveness of an electric toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush in biofilm removal; secondarily, to assess the effectiveness of individualised instructions provided by the operator.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Fifty-five paediatric patients were enrolled in the study. Data collection involved three main steps: 1) Pre-brushing PCR index collection; 2) Post-brushing PCR index collection; 3) Post-brushing PCR index collection after providing individual instructions. The tooth surfaces were colored with a liquid plaque detector. To assess whether there was a statistically significant difference in plaque values before and after brushing, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted. The Wilcoxon test with continuity correction was performed to compare the two brushing methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible to confirm a correlation between instructions provided by the operator and lower plaque index. As regards the comparison between manual and electric toothbrush, in our study one tool did not emerge as more effective than the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":11930,"journal":{"name":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between manual vs electric powered toothbrush by using the PCR index in paediatric dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"F S Ludovichetti, A G Signoriello, E Trevisiol, A Gracco, E Stellini, A Zuccon, S Mazzoleni\",\"doi\":\"10.23804/ejpd.2024.2138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This present study has two primary objectives: firstly, to compare the effectiveness of an electric toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush in biofilm removal; secondarily, to assess the effectiveness of individualised instructions provided by the operator.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Fifty-five paediatric patients were enrolled in the study. Data collection involved three main steps: 1) Pre-brushing PCR index collection; 2) Post-brushing PCR index collection; 3) Post-brushing PCR index collection after providing individual instructions. The tooth surfaces were colored with a liquid plaque detector. To assess whether there was a statistically significant difference in plaque values before and after brushing, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted. The Wilcoxon test with continuity correction was performed to compare the two brushing methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible to confirm a correlation between instructions provided by the operator and lower plaque index. As regards the comparison between manual and electric toothbrush, in our study one tool did not emerge as more effective than the other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.2138\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.2138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究有两个主要目的:首先,比较电动牙刷和手动牙刷在清除生物膜方面的效果;其次,评估操作员提供的个性化指导的效果:研究招募了 55 名儿科患者。数据收集包括三个主要步骤:1)刷牙前 PCR 指数收集;2)刷牙后 PCR 指数收集;3)提供个性化指导后 PCR 指数收集。使用液体牙菌斑检测器对牙齿表面进行着色。为评估刷牙前后牙菌斑值是否存在显著的统计学差异,进行了 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。在比较两种刷牙方法时,进行了带连续性校正的 Wilcoxon 检验:结论:操作员提供的指导与牙菌斑指数降低之间存在相关性。至于手动牙刷和电动牙刷之间的比较,在我们的研究中,一种工具并不比另一种工具更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between manual vs electric powered toothbrush by using the PCR index in paediatric dentistry.

Aim: This present study has two primary objectives: firstly, to compare the effectiveness of an electric toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush in biofilm removal; secondarily, to assess the effectiveness of individualised instructions provided by the operator.

Materials: Fifty-five paediatric patients were enrolled in the study. Data collection involved three main steps: 1) Pre-brushing PCR index collection; 2) Post-brushing PCR index collection; 3) Post-brushing PCR index collection after providing individual instructions. The tooth surfaces were colored with a liquid plaque detector. To assess whether there was a statistically significant difference in plaque values before and after brushing, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted. The Wilcoxon test with continuity correction was performed to compare the two brushing methods.

Conclusion: It is possible to confirm a correlation between instructions provided by the operator and lower plaque index. As regards the comparison between manual and electric toothbrush, in our study one tool did not emerge as more effective than the other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of paediatric dentistry
European journal of paediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry related to children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs.
期刊最新文献
Laser and remineralising agents in dental erosion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. "Ethnic disparities in the prevalence of Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH) and caries among 6-12-year-old children in Catalonia, Spain". Autotransplantation of an inverse impacted dilacerated incisor: a case report with 11-year follow-up. Dentine surface morphology according to caries removal method and subsequent acid etching. A digital study on predictive factors for Instagram users' engagement with amber necklace-related posts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1