亚极限强度的神经肌肉电刺激结合运动想象可提高皮质脊髓的兴奋性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y
Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre, Alain Martin
{"title":"亚极限强度的神经肌肉电刺激结合运动想象可提高皮质脊髓的兴奋性。","authors":"Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre, Alain Martin","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability.\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre, Alain Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"561-572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:文献中有少量证据表明,神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)和运动想象(MI)相结合比单独使用一种或另一种方式更能提高皮质脊髓的兴奋性。然而,神经肌肉电刺激的强度通常低于或处于运动阈值,无法适当激活整个神经肌肉系统。这就对采用更高强度的 MI + NMES 联合疗法的效果提出了质疑,因为这种疗法更接近临床环境中使用的强度。本文的目的是评估在不同诱发力下,MI、NMES 或两者结合时的皮质脊髓兴奋性:17 名健康参与者参加了一个疗程,该疗程包括针对桡侧屈肌(FCR)的 6 个条件:休息、MI、最大自主收缩(MVC)5% 和 20% 的 NMES 以及同时进行 MI 和 NMES(MI + NMES)。在每个条件下,通过经颅磁刺激唤起 FCR 的 MEP 来评估皮质脊髓兴奋性。通过刺激正中神经测量最大 M 波(Mmax):与静息时相比,心肌梗死时的 MEP 更大(P = 0.005)。MI 期间的 MEPs 在 5%(P = 0.02)和 20%(P = 0.001)时明显低于 MI + NMES 期间的 MEPs。然后,NMES 5%时的MEPs明显低于MI + NMES 20%时的MEPs(P 结论:MI + NMES 20%时的MEPs明显低于MI + NMES 20%时的MEPs:本研究表明,MI + NMES 比单独 MI 更能提高皮质脊髓兴奋性。然而,在 MI + NMES 过程中,皮质脊髓兴奋性并没有随着强度的增加而提高。因此,以 FCR 为目标的 MI + NMES 可能不会显著提高不同低次最大收缩强度之间的皮质神经兴奋性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability.

Purpose: There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.

Methods: Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.

Results: MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).

Conclusion: The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of burn injury size on cardiovascular responses to exercise in the heat. Influence of physical activity practice on sexual function in men: a systematic review. Sublingual caffeine delivery via oral spray does not accelerate blood caffeine increase compared to ingestion of caffeinated beverages. Effects of a single dose of a betalain-rich concentrate on determinants of running performance and recovery muscle blood flow: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. The effects of normobaric hypoxic resistance training on muscle strength in healthy adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1