{"title":"亚极限强度的神经肌肉电刺激结合运动想象可提高皮质脊髓的兴奋性。","authors":"Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre, Alain Martin","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"561-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability.\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Eon, Sidney Grosprêtre, Alain Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"561-572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:文献中有少量证据表明,神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)和运动想象(MI)相结合比单独使用一种或另一种方式更能提高皮质脊髓的兴奋性。然而,神经肌肉电刺激的强度通常低于或处于运动阈值,无法适当激活整个神经肌肉系统。这就对采用更高强度的 MI + NMES 联合疗法的效果提出了质疑,因为这种疗法更接近临床环境中使用的强度。本文的目的是评估在不同诱发力下,MI、NMES 或两者结合时的皮质脊髓兴奋性:17 名健康参与者参加了一个疗程,该疗程包括针对桡侧屈肌(FCR)的 6 个条件:休息、MI、最大自主收缩(MVC)5% 和 20% 的 NMES 以及同时进行 MI 和 NMES(MI + NMES)。在每个条件下,通过经颅磁刺激唤起 FCR 的 MEP 来评估皮质脊髓兴奋性。通过刺激正中神经测量最大 M 波(Mmax):与静息时相比,心肌梗死时的 MEP 更大(P = 0.005)。MI 期间的 MEPs 在 5%(P = 0.02)和 20%(P = 0.001)时明显低于 MI + NMES 期间的 MEPs。然后,NMES 5%时的MEPs明显低于MI + NMES 20%时的MEPs(P 结论:MI + NMES 20%时的MEPs明显低于MI + NMES 20%时的MEPs:本研究表明,MI + NMES 比单独 MI 更能提高皮质脊髓兴奋性。然而,在 MI + NMES 过程中,皮质脊髓兴奋性并没有随着强度的增加而提高。因此,以 FCR 为目标的 MI + NMES 可能不会显著提高不同低次最大收缩强度之间的皮质神经兴奋性。
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability.
Purpose: There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.
Methods: Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.
Results: MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).
Conclusion: The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.