Manika Mittal, Nitika Bajaj, Meenu Bhola, Gurlal S Brar
{"title":"GC Gold Label IX 与 GC Gold Label IX Extra 和 GC Gold Label Hybrid 在初级磨牙手工器械技术制备的龋洞中的比较评估:体内研究","authors":"Manika Mittal, Nitika Bajaj, Meenu Bhola, Gurlal S Brar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical efficacy of GC Gold Label IX, GC Gold Label IX Extra, and GC Gold Label Hybrid in occlusal surface cavities in primary molars prepared by hand instrumentation technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety primary molars were selected from the children according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected teeth were randomly allocated into the following three groups, with 30 teeth in each group, according to the restorative material used: group I: GC Gold Label IX, group II: GC Gold Label IX Extra, and group III: GC Gold Label Hybrid. Occlusal cavities were prepared using hand instruments. Caries removal efficacy was verified using caries detector dye. The restorative materials were mixed and condensed into the prepared cavities. The restorations were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria at 1, 3, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the Chi-squared test. No significant difference was found in terms of color match, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, surface roughness, and secondary caries, but a significant difference was observed in terms of retention and anatomic form between group I and group III.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GC Gold Label Hybrid exhibited better clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX and comparable clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX Extra.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>GC Gold Label Hybrid is a newly developed glass ionomer cement (GIC), and its clinical performance needs to be studied.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mittal M, Bajaj N, Bhola M, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of GC Gold Label IX with GC Gold Label IX Extra and GC Gold Label Hybrid in Cavitated Lesions Prepared by Hand Instrumentation Technique in Primary Molars: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):570-575.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of GC Gold Label IX with GC Gold Label IX Extra and GC Gold Label Hybrid in Cavitated Lesions Prepared by Hand Instrumentation Technique in Primary Molars: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Manika Mittal, Nitika Bajaj, Meenu Bhola, Gurlal S Brar\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical efficacy of GC Gold Label IX, GC Gold Label IX Extra, and GC Gold Label Hybrid in occlusal surface cavities in primary molars prepared by hand instrumentation technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety primary molars were selected from the children according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected teeth were randomly allocated into the following three groups, with 30 teeth in each group, according to the restorative material used: group I: GC Gold Label IX, group II: GC Gold Label IX Extra, and group III: GC Gold Label Hybrid. Occlusal cavities were prepared using hand instruments. Caries removal efficacy was verified using caries detector dye. The restorative materials were mixed and condensed into the prepared cavities. The restorations were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria at 1, 3, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the Chi-squared test. No significant difference was found in terms of color match, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, surface roughness, and secondary caries, but a significant difference was observed in terms of retention and anatomic form between group I and group III.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GC Gold Label Hybrid exhibited better clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX and comparable clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX Extra.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>GC Gold Label Hybrid is a newly developed glass ionomer cement (GIC), and its clinical performance needs to be studied.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mittal M, Bajaj N, Bhola M, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of GC Gold Label IX with GC Gold Label IX Extra and GC Gold Label Hybrid in Cavitated Lesions Prepared by Hand Instrumentation Technique in Primary Molars: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):570-575.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是比较 GC 金标九号、GC 金标九号额外型和 GC 金标混合型在用手工器械技术制备的小磨牙咬合面龋洞中的临床疗效:根据纳入和排除标准从儿童中选取 90 颗小磨牙。根据使用的修复材料,将所选牙齿随机分为以下三组,每组 30 颗:第一组:GC 金标 IX;第二组:GC 金标 IX Extra;第三组:GC 金标 Hybrid。咬合龋洞用手工器械制备。使用龋齿检测染料验证龋齿去除效果。将修复材料混合并凝结在制备好的龋洞中。在 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时,使用修改后的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)评估标准对修复体进行评估:结果:采用卡方检验对结果进行统计分析并列表。在颜色匹配、边缘变色、边缘完整性、表面粗糙度和继发性龋齿方面没有发现明显差异,但在固位和解剖形态方面观察到第一组和第三组之间存在明显差异:GC Gold Label Hybrid的临床表现优于GC Gold Label IX,与GC Gold Label IX Extra的临床表现相当:GC Gold Label Hybrid是一种新开发的玻璃离子水泥(GIC),其临床表现有待研究:Mittal M, Bajaj N, Bhola M, et al:一项体内研究。Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):570-575.
Comparative Evaluation of GC Gold Label IX with GC Gold Label IX Extra and GC Gold Label Hybrid in Cavitated Lesions Prepared by Hand Instrumentation Technique in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study.
Aim: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical efficacy of GC Gold Label IX, GC Gold Label IX Extra, and GC Gold Label Hybrid in occlusal surface cavities in primary molars prepared by hand instrumentation technique.
Materials and methods: Ninety primary molars were selected from the children according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected teeth were randomly allocated into the following three groups, with 30 teeth in each group, according to the restorative material used: group I: GC Gold Label IX, group II: GC Gold Label IX Extra, and group III: GC Gold Label Hybrid. Occlusal cavities were prepared using hand instruments. Caries removal efficacy was verified using caries detector dye. The restorative materials were mixed and condensed into the prepared cavities. The restorations were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria at 1, 3, and 6 months.
Results: The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the Chi-squared test. No significant difference was found in terms of color match, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, surface roughness, and secondary caries, but a significant difference was observed in terms of retention and anatomic form between group I and group III.
Conclusion: GC Gold Label Hybrid exhibited better clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX and comparable clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX Extra.
Clinical significance: GC Gold Label Hybrid is a newly developed glass ionomer cement (GIC), and its clinical performance needs to be studied.
How to cite this article: Mittal M, Bajaj N, Bhola M, et al. Comparative Evaluation of GC Gold Label IX with GC Gold Label IX Extra and GC Gold Label Hybrid in Cavitated Lesions Prepared by Hand Instrumentation Technique in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):570-575.