深入探讨认知神经科学中 fMRI 方法与理论之间的相互作用。

Derek J Huffman
{"title":"深入探讨认知神经科学中 fMRI 方法与理论之间的相互作用。","authors":"Derek J Huffman","doi":"10.59390/ZABM1739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a cornerstone of cognitive neuroscience since its invention in the 1990s. The methods that we use for fMRI data analysis allow us to test different theories of the brain, thus different analyses can lead us to different conclusions about how the brain produces cognition. There has been a centuries-long debate about the nature of neural processing, with some theories arguing for functional specialization or localization (e.g., face and scene processing) while other theories suggest that cognition is implemented in distributed representations across many neurons and brain regions. Importantly, these theories have received support via different types of analyses; therefore, having students implement hands-on data analysis to explore the results of different fMRI analyses can allow them to take a firsthand approach to thinking about highly influential theories in cognitive neuroscience. Moreover, these explorations allow students to see that there are not clearcut \"right\" or \"wrong\" answers in cognitive neuroscience, rather we effectively instantiate assumptions within our analytical approaches that can lead us to different conclusions. Here, I provide Python code that uses freely available software and data to teach students how to analyze fMRI data using traditional activation analysis and machine-learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). Altogether, these resources help teach students about the paramount importance of methodology in shaping our theories of the brain, and I believe they will be helpful for introductory undergraduate courses, graduate-level courses, and as a first analysis for people working in labs that use fMRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":74004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An In-depth Exploration of the Interplay between fMRI Methods and Theory in Cognitive Neuroscience.\",\"authors\":\"Derek J Huffman\",\"doi\":\"10.59390/ZABM1739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a cornerstone of cognitive neuroscience since its invention in the 1990s. The methods that we use for fMRI data analysis allow us to test different theories of the brain, thus different analyses can lead us to different conclusions about how the brain produces cognition. There has been a centuries-long debate about the nature of neural processing, with some theories arguing for functional specialization or localization (e.g., face and scene processing) while other theories suggest that cognition is implemented in distributed representations across many neurons and brain regions. Importantly, these theories have received support via different types of analyses; therefore, having students implement hands-on data analysis to explore the results of different fMRI analyses can allow them to take a firsthand approach to thinking about highly influential theories in cognitive neuroscience. Moreover, these explorations allow students to see that there are not clearcut \\\"right\\\" or \\\"wrong\\\" answers in cognitive neuroscience, rather we effectively instantiate assumptions within our analytical approaches that can lead us to different conclusions. Here, I provide Python code that uses freely available software and data to teach students how to analyze fMRI data using traditional activation analysis and machine-learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). Altogether, these resources help teach students about the paramount importance of methodology in shaping our theories of the brain, and I believe they will be helpful for introductory undergraduate courses, graduate-level courses, and as a first analysis for people working in labs that use fMRI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59390/ZABM1739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59390/ZABM1739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能磁共振成像(fMRI)自 20 世纪 90 年代发明以来,一直是认知神经科学的基石。我们使用的 fMRI 数据分析方法可以检验大脑的不同理论,因此不同的分析方法可以让我们得出大脑如何产生认知的不同结论。关于神经处理的本质,人们已经争论了几个世纪,有些理论认为是功能特化或局部化(如人脸和场景处理),而另一些理论则认为认知是在许多神经元和脑区的分布式表征中实现的。重要的是,这些理论通过不同类型的分析得到了支持;因此,让学生动手进行数据分析,探索不同的 fMRI 分析结果,可以让他们以第一手的方法思考认知神经科学中极具影响力的理论。此外,这些探索还能让学生看到,认知神经科学中并不存在明确的 "正确 "或 "错误 "答案,相反,我们在分析方法中有效地将假设实例化,从而得出不同的结论。在这里,我提供了使用免费软件和数据的 Python 代码,教学生如何使用传统的激活分析和基于机器学习的多元模式分析 (MVPA) 分析 fMRI 数据。总之,这些资源有助于让学生了解方法论在塑造我们的大脑理论方面的至关重要性,我相信它们对本科入门课程、研究生课程以及在使用 fMRI 的实验室工作的人员的首次分析都会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An In-depth Exploration of the Interplay between fMRI Methods and Theory in Cognitive Neuroscience.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been a cornerstone of cognitive neuroscience since its invention in the 1990s. The methods that we use for fMRI data analysis allow us to test different theories of the brain, thus different analyses can lead us to different conclusions about how the brain produces cognition. There has been a centuries-long debate about the nature of neural processing, with some theories arguing for functional specialization or localization (e.g., face and scene processing) while other theories suggest that cognition is implemented in distributed representations across many neurons and brain regions. Importantly, these theories have received support via different types of analyses; therefore, having students implement hands-on data analysis to explore the results of different fMRI analyses can allow them to take a firsthand approach to thinking about highly influential theories in cognitive neuroscience. Moreover, these explorations allow students to see that there are not clearcut "right" or "wrong" answers in cognitive neuroscience, rather we effectively instantiate assumptions within our analytical approaches that can lead us to different conclusions. Here, I provide Python code that uses freely available software and data to teach students how to analyze fMRI data using traditional activation analysis and machine-learning-based multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). Altogether, these resources help teach students about the paramount importance of methodology in shaping our theories of the brain, and I believe they will be helpful for introductory undergraduate courses, graduate-level courses, and as a first analysis for people working in labs that use fMRI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive Notebooks Improve Students' Understanding of Developmental Neurobiology, Attitudes Toward Research, and Experimental Design Competency in a Lecture-Based Neuroscience Course. Introducing BRAINOER: The Behavioral Research and Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Open Educational Repository. Low-Cost Classroom and Laboratory Exercises for Investigating Both Wave and Event-Related Electroencephalogram Potentials. Memphis NeuroSTART Program: Promoting Student Success and Increasing the Diversity of Applicants to Neuroscience Graduate Programs. Neurodiversity in the Minds of Students: From Perception to Campus Programming.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1