麻疹腮腺炎风疹(MMR)疫苗鞘内注射与自动植入治疗掌周疣和掌跖疣疗效的比较研究:随机对照试验

IF 1.9 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Indian Dermatology Online Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.4103/idoj.idoj_394_23
Ravindra Abusaria, Chinmai Yadav, Vinod Jain, Dilip Kachhawa, Pankaj Rao, Anand Lamoria
{"title":"麻疹腮腺炎风疹(MMR)疫苗鞘内注射与自动植入治疗掌周疣和掌跖疣疗效的比较研究:随机对照试验","authors":"Ravindra Abusaria, Chinmai Yadav, Vinod Jain, Dilip Kachhawa, Pankaj Rao, Anand Lamoria","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_394_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Warts are benign epidermal proliferations, caused by infection of keratinocytes with human papillomavirus (HPV). Auto implantation and intralesional mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) vaccine are novel methods of immunotherapy for treating periungual and palmoplantar warts. They act by stimulating the patient's immune system; this clears not only the local warts but also distant warts with lesser side effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and safety of both methods in treating periungual and palmoplantar warts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 80 patients. Group A was treated with 0.3 mL of intralesional MMR vaccine at an interval of 3 weeks or for a maximum of three sittings, and Group B was treated with auto implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of therapy, the result was better in group A (MMR vaccine) as 86% of cases yielded an excellent response as compared to 71% in group B (auto implantation). The recurrence rate was 5% in group A and 4% in group B. There were no serious side effects in both groups with pain during injection (70%) in group A and swelling at the recipient site (8%) in group B being the most common side effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both MMR and auto implantation had significant response rates. But MMR was faster and better.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intralesional Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) Vaccine and Auto Implantation for the Treatment of Periungual and Palmoplantar Warts: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ravindra Abusaria, Chinmai Yadav, Vinod Jain, Dilip Kachhawa, Pankaj Rao, Anand Lamoria\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/idoj.idoj_394_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Warts are benign epidermal proliferations, caused by infection of keratinocytes with human papillomavirus (HPV). Auto implantation and intralesional mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) vaccine are novel methods of immunotherapy for treating periungual and palmoplantar warts. They act by stimulating the patient's immune system; this clears not only the local warts but also distant warts with lesser side effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and safety of both methods in treating periungual and palmoplantar warts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 80 patients. Group A was treated with 0.3 mL of intralesional MMR vaccine at an interval of 3 weeks or for a maximum of three sittings, and Group B was treated with auto implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of therapy, the result was better in group A (MMR vaccine) as 86% of cases yielded an excellent response as compared to 71% in group B (auto implantation). The recurrence rate was 5% in group A and 4% in group B. There were no serious side effects in both groups with pain during injection (70%) in group A and swelling at the recipient site (8%) in group B being the most common side effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both MMR and auto implantation had significant response rates. But MMR was faster and better.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_394_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_394_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疣是表皮良性增生,由角质细胞感染人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)引起。自体植入疗法和腮腺炎、麻疹和风疹(MMR)疫苗鞘内注射疗法是治疗毛周疣和掌跖疣的新型免疫疗法。它们通过刺激患者的免疫系统发挥作用,不仅能清除局部疣体,还能清除远处的疣体,而且副作用较小:我们开展了这项研究,以比较两种方法治疗毛周疣和掌跖疣的疗效和安全性:将 160 名患者随机分为两组,每组 80 人。A组采用0.3 mL麻风腮疫苗鞘内注射治疗,间隔3周或最多3次;B组采用自动植入治疗:治疗结束后,A 组(接种麻风腮疫苗)的疗效更好,86% 的病例获得了极佳反应,而 B 组(自动植入)只有 71%。两组均无严重副作用,最常见的副作用是注射时疼痛(A 组为 70%)和受体部位肿胀(B 组为 8%):结论:MMR 和自体脂肪植入术都有显著的反应率。结论:MMR 和自体脂肪移植都有明显的反应率,但 MMR 更快更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intralesional Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) Vaccine and Auto Implantation for the Treatment of Periungual and Palmoplantar Warts: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Warts are benign epidermal proliferations, caused by infection of keratinocytes with human papillomavirus (HPV). Auto implantation and intralesional mumps, measles, and rubella (MMR) vaccine are novel methods of immunotherapy for treating periungual and palmoplantar warts. They act by stimulating the patient's immune system; this clears not only the local warts but also distant warts with lesser side effects.

Objective: We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and safety of both methods in treating periungual and palmoplantar warts.

Materials and methods: A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 80 patients. Group A was treated with 0.3 mL of intralesional MMR vaccine at an interval of 3 weeks or for a maximum of three sittings, and Group B was treated with auto implantation.

Results: At the end of therapy, the result was better in group A (MMR vaccine) as 86% of cases yielded an excellent response as compared to 71% in group B (auto implantation). The recurrence rate was 5% in group A and 4% in group B. There were no serious side effects in both groups with pain during injection (70%) in group A and swelling at the recipient site (8%) in group B being the most common side effect.

Conclusion: Both MMR and auto implantation had significant response rates. But MMR was faster and better.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bicalutamide in Dermatology: A Narrative Review. Clinicopathological Profile of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A 10-Year Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Center in South India. Novel Inflammatory Markers Associated With Cutaneous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Etiology. Pediatric Basidiobolomycosis: An Uncommon and Misdiagnosed Entity. Premature Graying of Hair: A Comprehensive Review and Recent Insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1