Omar Dhrif, Mohamed Salah Hamdi, Ines Kechaou, Eya Cherif, Imen Boukhris, Lamia Ben Hassine
{"title":"与皮肤白细胞胞浆细胞性血管炎病因相关的新型炎症标志物","authors":"Omar Dhrif, Mohamed Salah Hamdi, Ines Kechaou, Eya Cherif, Imen Boukhris, Lamia Ben Hassine","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_806_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare inflammatory markers and determine their potential role in distinguishing secondary leukocytoclastic vasculitis (SLV) from idiopathic leukocytoclastic vasculitis (ILV).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included in this cross-sectional study patients with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (CLV) diagnosed on cutaneous biopsy. We assessed clinical and laboratory data and then calculated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR). We have also defined the number of positive etiological examination (NPE) as the sum in a unique patient of the positive paraclinical examinations involved in the etiological assessment of CLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 77 patients were included, with 52 SLV group patients and 25 in the ILV group, mean age was 44+/-18 vs 49+/-21, and gender ratio was 29/23 vs 11/14. Comparison of PLR, NLR, CAR, and FAR showed significant differences in mean values between SLV and ILV groups with 199.1 (117.3-309.8) vs 126.8 (79-193) (<i>P</i> = 0.01) for PLR, 3.6 (1.9-5.1) vs 2.3 (1.7-3.4) (<i>P</i> = 0.048) for NLR, 1.9 mg.g-1 (0.4-3.6) vs 0.6 mg g-1 (0.2-1.9) (<i>P</i> = 0.043) for CAR, and 155.8 mg.g-1 (90.7-192.3) vs 108.7 mg.g-1 (82.2-148.1) (<i>P</i> = 0.034) for FAR. PLR, CAR, and FAR were positively correlated to NPE (r = 0.463, <i>P</i> < 0.001; r = 0.434, <i>P</i> < 0.001; and r = 0.411, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively), and there was no significant correlation between NLR and NPE (r = 0.165, <i>P</i> = 0.151).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to investigate PLR, NLR, CAR, and FAR in CLV, and it demonstrates that elevation of these ratios is associated with SLV, which leads us to suggest to exhaustively explore patients with elevated ratios.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":"15 5","pages":"805-811"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Inflammatory Markers Associated With Cutaneous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Etiology.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Dhrif, Mohamed Salah Hamdi, Ines Kechaou, Eya Cherif, Imen Boukhris, Lamia Ben Hassine\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/idoj.idoj_806_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare inflammatory markers and determine their potential role in distinguishing secondary leukocytoclastic vasculitis (SLV) from idiopathic leukocytoclastic vasculitis (ILV).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included in this cross-sectional study patients with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (CLV) diagnosed on cutaneous biopsy. We assessed clinical and laboratory data and then calculated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR). We have also defined the number of positive etiological examination (NPE) as the sum in a unique patient of the positive paraclinical examinations involved in the etiological assessment of CLV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 77 patients were included, with 52 SLV group patients and 25 in the ILV group, mean age was 44+/-18 vs 49+/-21, and gender ratio was 29/23 vs 11/14. Comparison of PLR, NLR, CAR, and FAR showed significant differences in mean values between SLV and ILV groups with 199.1 (117.3-309.8) vs 126.8 (79-193) (<i>P</i> = 0.01) for PLR, 3.6 (1.9-5.1) vs 2.3 (1.7-3.4) (<i>P</i> = 0.048) for NLR, 1.9 mg.g-1 (0.4-3.6) vs 0.6 mg g-1 (0.2-1.9) (<i>P</i> = 0.043) for CAR, and 155.8 mg.g-1 (90.7-192.3) vs 108.7 mg.g-1 (82.2-148.1) (<i>P</i> = 0.034) for FAR. PLR, CAR, and FAR were positively correlated to NPE (r = 0.463, <i>P</i> < 0.001; r = 0.434, <i>P</i> < 0.001; and r = 0.411, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively), and there was no significant correlation between NLR and NPE (r = 0.165, <i>P</i> = 0.151).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to investigate PLR, NLR, CAR, and FAR in CLV, and it demonstrates that elevation of these ratios is associated with SLV, which leads us to suggest to exhaustively explore patients with elevated ratios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"805-811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Dermatology Online Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_806_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_806_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们的目的是比较炎症标志物,并确定它们在区分继发性白细胞凝集性血管炎(SLV)和特发性白细胞凝集性血管炎(ILV)方面的潜在作用:我们在这项横断面研究中纳入了经皮肤活检确诊的皮肤白细胞胞浆细胞性血管炎(CLV)患者。我们评估了临床和实验室数据,然后计算了血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)-白蛋白比值(CAR)和纤维蛋白原-白蛋白比值(FAR)。我们还将病因学检查阳性次数(NPE)定义为一名患者在CLV病因学评估中接受的临床旁检查阳性次数的总和:共纳入77例患者,其中SLV组52例,ILV组25例,平均年龄为44+/-18 vs 49+/-21,性别比为29/23 vs 11/14。PLR、NLR、CAR 和 FAR 的比较显示,SLV 组和 ILV 组的平均值存在显著差异,PLR 为 199.1(117.3-309.8) vs 126.8(79-193)(P = 0.01),NLR 为 3.6(1.9-5.1) vs 2.3 (1.7-3.4) (P = 0.048),CAR 为 1.9 mg.g-1 (0.4-3.6) vs 0.6 mg g-1 (0.2-1.9) (P = 0.043),FAR 为 155.8 mg.g-1 (90.7-192.3) vs 108.7 mg.g-1 (82.2-148.1) (P = 0.034)。PLR、CAR和FAR与NPE呈正相关(分别为r = 0.463,P < 0.001;r = 0.434,P < 0.001;r = 0.411,P < 0.001),而NLR与NPE之间无显著相关性(r = 0.165,P = 0.151):这是第一项研究CLV中PLR、NLR、CAR和FAR的研究,它表明这些比率的升高与SLV相关,因此我们建议对比率升高的患者进行详尽的研究。
Novel Inflammatory Markers Associated With Cutaneous Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis Etiology.
Objectives: We aimed to compare inflammatory markers and determine their potential role in distinguishing secondary leukocytoclastic vasculitis (SLV) from idiopathic leukocytoclastic vasculitis (ILV).
Materials and methods: We included in this cross-sectional study patients with cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis (CLV) diagnosed on cutaneous biopsy. We assessed clinical and laboratory data and then calculated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR). We have also defined the number of positive etiological examination (NPE) as the sum in a unique patient of the positive paraclinical examinations involved in the etiological assessment of CLV.
Results: In total 77 patients were included, with 52 SLV group patients and 25 in the ILV group, mean age was 44+/-18 vs 49+/-21, and gender ratio was 29/23 vs 11/14. Comparison of PLR, NLR, CAR, and FAR showed significant differences in mean values between SLV and ILV groups with 199.1 (117.3-309.8) vs 126.8 (79-193) (P = 0.01) for PLR, 3.6 (1.9-5.1) vs 2.3 (1.7-3.4) (P = 0.048) for NLR, 1.9 mg.g-1 (0.4-3.6) vs 0.6 mg g-1 (0.2-1.9) (P = 0.043) for CAR, and 155.8 mg.g-1 (90.7-192.3) vs 108.7 mg.g-1 (82.2-148.1) (P = 0.034) for FAR. PLR, CAR, and FAR were positively correlated to NPE (r = 0.463, P < 0.001; r = 0.434, P < 0.001; and r = 0.411, P < 0.001, respectively), and there was no significant correlation between NLR and NPE (r = 0.165, P = 0.151).
Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate PLR, NLR, CAR, and FAR in CLV, and it demonstrates that elevation of these ratios is associated with SLV, which leads us to suggest to exhaustively explore patients with elevated ratios.