用于基底细胞癌肿瘤边缘检测的新型成像技术:对 FDA 和 EMA 批准的成像模式进行的系统性范围审查。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY International Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1111/ijd.17496
Mehdi Boostani, Szabolcs Bozsányi, Mariano Suppa, Carmen Cantisani, Kende Lőrincz, András Bánvölgyi, Péter Holló, Norbert M Wikonkál, Wendy J Huss, Kimberly L Brady, Gyorgy Paragh, Norbert Kiss
{"title":"用于基底细胞癌肿瘤边缘检测的新型成像技术:对 FDA 和 EMA 批准的成像模式进行的系统性范围审查。","authors":"Mehdi Boostani, Szabolcs Bozsányi, Mariano Suppa, Carmen Cantisani, Kende Lőrincz, András Bánvölgyi, Péter Holló, Norbert M Wikonkál, Wendy J Huss, Kimberly L Brady, Gyorgy Paragh, Norbert Kiss","doi":"10.1111/ijd.17496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for removing basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) due to its ability to guarantee 100% margin evaluation through frozen section histopathology, offering the highest cure rate among current treatments. However, noninvasive imaging technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to clinical assessment for defining presurgical margins. This systematic scoping review examines the efficacy of these imaging modalities, focusing on those approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A systematic search of EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Public Library databases identified 11 relevant studies out of 2123 records, encompassing 644 lesions across five imaging techniques. The findings suggest that dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT), and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) show potential in detecting BCC margins, which could enhance MMS by providing better preoperative planning, informing patients of expected defect size, aiding in reconstruction decisions, and reducing overall procedure costs. This review discusses the benefits and limitations of each technique, offering insights into how these innovations could influence the future of BCC management. Emerging imaging techniques could enhance MMS by improving BCC margin assessment and reducing costs. Their adoption will depend on price and ease of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel imaging techniques for tumor margin detection in basal cell carcinoma: a systematic scoping review of FDA and EMA-approved imaging modalities.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Boostani, Szabolcs Bozsányi, Mariano Suppa, Carmen Cantisani, Kende Lőrincz, András Bánvölgyi, Péter Holló, Norbert M Wikonkál, Wendy J Huss, Kimberly L Brady, Gyorgy Paragh, Norbert Kiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijd.17496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for removing basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) due to its ability to guarantee 100% margin evaluation through frozen section histopathology, offering the highest cure rate among current treatments. However, noninvasive imaging technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to clinical assessment for defining presurgical margins. This systematic scoping review examines the efficacy of these imaging modalities, focusing on those approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A systematic search of EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Public Library databases identified 11 relevant studies out of 2123 records, encompassing 644 lesions across five imaging techniques. The findings suggest that dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT), and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) show potential in detecting BCC margins, which could enhance MMS by providing better preoperative planning, informing patients of expected defect size, aiding in reconstruction decisions, and reducing overall procedure costs. This review discusses the benefits and limitations of each technique, offering insights into how these innovations could influence the future of BCC management. Emerging imaging techniques could enhance MMS by improving BCC margin assessment and reducing costs. Their adoption will depend on price and ease of use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17496\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.17496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

莫氏显微放射手术(MMS)是切除基底细胞癌(BCC)的黄金标准,因为它能保证通过冰冻切片组织病理学对边缘进行 100% 的评估,是目前治愈率最高的治疗方法。然而,无创成像技术已成为临床评估确定术前边缘的有前途的替代方法。本系统性范围界定综述研究了这些成像模式的功效,重点关注美国食品药品管理局(FDA)或欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准用于临床的成像模式。通过对 EMBASE、Scopus、PubMed 和 Cochrane 公共图书馆数据库进行系统检索,在 2123 条记录中发现了 11 项相关研究,涉及五种成像技术的 644 个病变。研究结果表明,皮肤镜、高频超声 (HFUS)、光学相干断层扫描 (OCT)、线场光学相干断层扫描 (LC-OCT) 和反射共聚焦显微镜 (RCM) 在检测 BCC 边缘方面显示出潜力,可通过提供更好的术前规划、告知患者预期缺损大小、协助重建决策和降低总体手术成本来提高 MMS 的效果。本综述将讨论每种技术的优势和局限性,深入探讨这些创新技术将如何影响 BCC 管理的未来。新兴成像技术可以改善 BCC 边缘评估并降低成本,从而提高 MMS 的效果。它们的采用将取决于价格和易用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel imaging techniques for tumor margin detection in basal cell carcinoma: a systematic scoping review of FDA and EMA-approved imaging modalities.

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for removing basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) due to its ability to guarantee 100% margin evaluation through frozen section histopathology, offering the highest cure rate among current treatments. However, noninvasive imaging technologies have emerged as promising alternatives to clinical assessment for defining presurgical margins. This systematic scoping review examines the efficacy of these imaging modalities, focusing on those approved for clinical use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A systematic search of EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Public Library databases identified 11 relevant studies out of 2123 records, encompassing 644 lesions across five imaging techniques. The findings suggest that dermoscopy, high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT), and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) show potential in detecting BCC margins, which could enhance MMS by providing better preoperative planning, informing patients of expected defect size, aiding in reconstruction decisions, and reducing overall procedure costs. This review discusses the benefits and limitations of each technique, offering insights into how these innovations could influence the future of BCC management. Emerging imaging techniques could enhance MMS by improving BCC margin assessment and reducing costs. Their adoption will depend on price and ease of use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
476
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education. The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.
期刊最新文献
AI and epigenetics: new approaches to skin aging understanding and treatment. Occupational chemical exposure: A case of patterned squamous cell carcinoma in a radiology technician. Cost-efficiency of excision and non-excision-based keratoacanthoma treatment modalities. Enriched class II HLA inherence in patients with checkpoint inhibitor-associated bullous pemphigoid. External validation study of Re-SCORTEN in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1