胸腹腔常温区域灌注与腹腔常温区域灌注后受控 DCDD 肺移植的结果:西班牙的经验。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.018
Anna Minasyan, Mercedes de la Torre, Joel Rosado Rodriguez, Alberto Jauregui Abularach, Alejandra Romero Román, Nuria Novoa Valentin, Ivan Martínez Serna, Pablo Gámez García, Alilis Fontana, Gabriel Sales Badia, Francisco Javier González García, Angel Salvatierra Velazquez, Loreto Berjon, Roberto Mons Lera, Pedro Rodríguez Suarez, Elisabeth Coll, Eduardo Miñambres, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz
{"title":"胸腹腔常温区域灌注与腹腔常温区域灌注后受控 DCDD 肺移植的结果:西班牙的经验。","authors":"Anna Minasyan, Mercedes de la Torre, Joel Rosado Rodriguez, Alberto Jauregui Abularach, Alejandra Romero Román, Nuria Novoa Valentin, Ivan Martínez Serna, Pablo Gámez García, Alilis Fontana, Gabriel Sales Badia, Francisco Javier González García, Angel Salvatierra Velazquez, Loreto Berjon, Roberto Mons Lera, Pedro Rodríguez Suarez, Elisabeth Coll, Eduardo Miñambres, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a strategy for evaluating and recovering the heart in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD). However, its impact on lung grafts remains largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of TA-NRP on the outcomes of recipients of cDCDD lungs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study describing the outcomes of cDCDD lung transplants (LTs) performed in Spain from January 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on the recovery technique: TA-NRP with the simultaneous recovery of the heart vs abdominal NRP (A-NRP) without simultaneous heart recovery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at 72 hours. Secondary endpoints included the overall incidence of PGD, days on mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, early survival rates, and mid-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and eighty three cDCDD LTs were performed during the study period, 28 (10%) using TA-NRP and 255 (90%) using A-NRP. No differences were observed in the incidence of PGD grade 3 at 72 hours between the TA-NRP and the A-NRP group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.231), though the overall incidence of PGD was significantly lower with TA-NRP (14.3% vs 41.5%; p = 0.005). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding other post-transplant outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TA-NRP allows the simultaneous recovery of both the heart and the lungs in the cDCDD scenario with appropriate LT outcomes comparable to those observed with the A-NRP approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":15900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of controlled DCDD lung transplantation after thoraco-abdominal vs abdominal normothermic regional perfusion: The Spanish experience.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Minasyan, Mercedes de la Torre, Joel Rosado Rodriguez, Alberto Jauregui Abularach, Alejandra Romero Román, Nuria Novoa Valentin, Ivan Martínez Serna, Pablo Gámez García, Alilis Fontana, Gabriel Sales Badia, Francisco Javier González García, Angel Salvatierra Velazquez, Loreto Berjon, Roberto Mons Lera, Pedro Rodríguez Suarez, Elisabeth Coll, Eduardo Miñambres, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral de la Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a strategy for evaluating and recovering the heart in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD). However, its impact on lung grafts remains largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of TA-NRP on the outcomes of recipients of cDCDD lungs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study describing the outcomes of cDCDD lung transplants (LTs) performed in Spain from January 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on the recovery technique: TA-NRP with the simultaneous recovery of the heart vs abdominal NRP (A-NRP) without simultaneous heart recovery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at 72 hours. Secondary endpoints included the overall incidence of PGD, days on mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, early survival rates, and mid-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and eighty three cDCDD LTs were performed during the study period, 28 (10%) using TA-NRP and 255 (90%) using A-NRP. No differences were observed in the incidence of PGD grade 3 at 72 hours between the TA-NRP and the A-NRP group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.231), though the overall incidence of PGD was significantly lower with TA-NRP (14.3% vs 41.5%; p = 0.005). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding other post-transplant outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TA-NRP allows the simultaneous recovery of both the heart and the lungs in the cDCDD scenario with appropriate LT outcomes comparable to those observed with the A-NRP approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2024.09.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胸腹腔常温区域灌注(TA-NRP)已成为评估和恢复死亡循环测定(cDCDD)后受控捐献心脏的一种策略。然而,它对肺移植的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。我们的目的是评估 TA-NRP 对 cDCDD 肺部受者预后的影响:这是一项回顾性、多中心、全国性研究,描述了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 11 月期间在西班牙进行的 cDCDD 肺移植(LT)的结果。根据回收技术将患者分为两组:同时恢复心脏的TA-NRP与不同时恢复心脏的腹腔NRP(A-NRP)。主要终点是72小时后原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)3级的发生率。次要终点包括 PGD 总发生率、机械通气天数、重症监护室和住院时间、早期存活率和中期结果。结果:研究期间共进行了 283 例 cDCDD LT,其中 28 例(10%)使用 TA-NRP,255 例(90%)使用 A-NRP。TA-NRP组和A-NRP组72小时内PGD 3级的发生率无差异(0% vs. 7.6%; p=0.231),但TA-NRP组的PGD总发生率显著较低(14.3% vs. 41.5%; p=0.005)。在移植后的其他结果变量方面,我们发现两组之间没有明显差异:结论:TA-NRP允许在cDCDD情况下同时恢复心脏和肺部,其适当的LT结果可与A-NRP方法观察到的结果相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of controlled DCDD lung transplantation after thoraco-abdominal vs abdominal normothermic regional perfusion: The Spanish experience.

Background: Thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a strategy for evaluating and recovering the heart in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD). However, its impact on lung grafts remains largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of TA-NRP on the outcomes of recipients of cDCDD lungs.

Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study describing the outcomes of cDCDD lung transplants (LTs) performed in Spain from January 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on the recovery technique: TA-NRP with the simultaneous recovery of the heart vs abdominal NRP (A-NRP) without simultaneous heart recovery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at 72 hours. Secondary endpoints included the overall incidence of PGD, days on mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, early survival rates, and mid-term outcomes.

Results: Two hundred and eighty three cDCDD LTs were performed during the study period, 28 (10%) using TA-NRP and 255 (90%) using A-NRP. No differences were observed in the incidence of PGD grade 3 at 72 hours between the TA-NRP and the A-NRP group (0% vs 7.6%; p = 0.231), though the overall incidence of PGD was significantly lower with TA-NRP (14.3% vs 41.5%; p = 0.005). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding other post-transplant outcome variables.

Conclusions: TA-NRP allows the simultaneous recovery of both the heart and the lungs in the cDCDD scenario with appropriate LT outcomes comparable to those observed with the A-NRP approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1667
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, the official publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, brings readers essential scholarly and timely information in the field of cardio-pulmonary transplantation, mechanical and biological support of the failing heart, advanced lung disease (including pulmonary vascular disease) and cell replacement therapy. Importantly, the journal also serves as a medium of communication of pre-clinical sciences in all these rapidly expanding areas.
期刊最新文献
Single-cell RNA-sequencing identifies unique cell-specific gene expression profiles in high-grade cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Donor-derived Cell-free DNA as a New Biomarker for Cardiac Allograft Rejection: a Prospective Study (FreeDNA-CAR). Extended Duration of Ex-Vivo Perfusion is Associated with Worse Survival in Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Recipients: A National Database Analysis. Mechanical Circulatory Support and Post-Transplant Infections: Is Temporary MCS Really Riskier? Nr4a1: a multilevel target to overcome PGD in lung transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1