纳米脂肪渗透改善早期疤痕成熟:疤痕分割对照、随机、双盲临床试验的组织学和分光光度法初步结果。

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojae072
Lisa Ramaut, Linde Moonen, Maxim Geeroms, Gaelle Leemans, Ellen Peters, Ramses Forsyth, Jan Gutermuth, Moustapha Hamdi
{"title":"纳米脂肪渗透改善早期疤痕成熟:疤痕分割对照、随机、双盲临床试验的组织学和分光光度法初步结果。","authors":"Lisa Ramaut, Linde Moonen, Maxim Geeroms, Gaelle Leemans, Ellen Peters, Ramses Forsyth, Jan Gutermuth, Moustapha Hamdi","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojae072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The regenerative properties of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in wound healing and scar formation are a subject of increasing clinical interest.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although preclinical studies have confirmed the angiogenetic, proliferative, and antifibrotic properties of SVF, there is limited clinical evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients who underwent abdominoplasty were included in this clinical study. Nanofat was mechanically obtained intraoperatively and infiltrated intradermally in the sutured surgical wound, randomly assigned to either the left or the right side. The abdominal scar was evaluated with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, whereas erythema and pigmentation were measured with a reflectance spectrophotometry device (Mexameter, Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Köln,Germany). Histological analysis and electron scan microscopy of tissue biopsies were performed at 8 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treated side of the scar showed significantly less erythema at 3- and 6-month follow-ups, but this difference reduced after 12 months. Patients reported better scar scores at the 6-month follow-up with a significantly better color at the treated side. Observers reported better overall scar scores at the treated side at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, with better vascularization, pigmentation, and thickness. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of histological analysis between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between both sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infiltration of nanofat exhibited promising results in surgical scar maturation characterized by less erythema and better texture. More clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted to better elucidate the possible benefits of SVF on surgical scar formation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 5: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"6 ","pages":"ojae072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement in Early Scar Maturation by Nanofat Infiltration: Histological and Spectrophotometric Preliminary Results From a Split Scar-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Ramaut, Linde Moonen, Maxim Geeroms, Gaelle Leemans, Ellen Peters, Ramses Forsyth, Jan Gutermuth, Moustapha Hamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asjof/ojae072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The regenerative properties of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in wound healing and scar formation are a subject of increasing clinical interest.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although preclinical studies have confirmed the angiogenetic, proliferative, and antifibrotic properties of SVF, there is limited clinical evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients who underwent abdominoplasty were included in this clinical study. Nanofat was mechanically obtained intraoperatively and infiltrated intradermally in the sutured surgical wound, randomly assigned to either the left or the right side. The abdominal scar was evaluated with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, whereas erythema and pigmentation were measured with a reflectance spectrophotometry device (Mexameter, Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Köln,Germany). Histological analysis and electron scan microscopy of tissue biopsies were performed at 8 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treated side of the scar showed significantly less erythema at 3- and 6-month follow-ups, but this difference reduced after 12 months. Patients reported better scar scores at the 6-month follow-up with a significantly better color at the treated side. Observers reported better overall scar scores at the treated side at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, with better vascularization, pigmentation, and thickness. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of histological analysis between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between both sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infiltration of nanofat exhibited promising results in surgical scar maturation characterized by less erythema and better texture. More clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted to better elucidate the possible benefits of SVF on surgical scar formation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 5: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"ojae072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基质血管成分(SVF)在伤口愈合和疤痕形成中的再生特性越来越受到临床关注:尽管临床前研究证实了 SVF 的血管生成、增殖和抗纤维化特性,但来自随机对照临床试验的临床证据却很有限:本临床研究纳入了 12 名接受腹部整形手术的患者。术中机械获取纳米脂肪,并在缝合的手术伤口处皮内浸润,随机分配到左侧或右侧。腹部疤痕采用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表进行评估,红斑和色素沉着则采用反射分光光度计(Mexameter,Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH,德国科伦)进行测量。8 个月后对组织活检进行组织学分析和电子扫描显微镜检查:结果:在 3 个月和 6 个月的随访中,接受治疗的一侧疤痕红斑明显减少,但在 12 个月后这种差异缩小。在 6 个月的随访中,患者的疤痕评分较好,治疗侧的疤痕颜色明显更好。在 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的随访中,观察者报告治疗侧的疤痕总体评分更好,血管化、色素沉着和厚度也更好。在组织学分析方面,两组之间没有明显的统计学差异。结论:结论:纳米脂肪的渗入对手术疤痕的成熟具有良好的效果,其特点是红斑更少、质地更好。为了更好地阐明 SVF 对手术瘢痕形成可能带来的益处,有必要进行更多样本量更大的临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improvement in Early Scar Maturation by Nanofat Infiltration: Histological and Spectrophotometric Preliminary Results From a Split Scar-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

Background: The regenerative properties of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in wound healing and scar formation are a subject of increasing clinical interest.

Objectives: Although preclinical studies have confirmed the angiogenetic, proliferative, and antifibrotic properties of SVF, there is limited clinical evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials.

Methods: Twelve patients who underwent abdominoplasty were included in this clinical study. Nanofat was mechanically obtained intraoperatively and infiltrated intradermally in the sutured surgical wound, randomly assigned to either the left or the right side. The abdominal scar was evaluated with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, whereas erythema and pigmentation were measured with a reflectance spectrophotometry device (Mexameter, Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Köln,Germany). Histological analysis and electron scan microscopy of tissue biopsies were performed at 8 months.

Results: The treated side of the scar showed significantly less erythema at 3- and 6-month follow-ups, but this difference reduced after 12 months. Patients reported better scar scores at the 6-month follow-up with a significantly better color at the treated side. Observers reported better overall scar scores at the treated side at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, with better vascularization, pigmentation, and thickness. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of histological analysis between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between both sides.

Conclusions: Infiltration of nanofat exhibited promising results in surgical scar maturation characterized by less erythema and better texture. More clinical trials with a larger sample size are warranted to better elucidate the possible benefits of SVF on surgical scar formation.

Level of evidence 5:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Commentary on: The Role of Nasal Fat Preservation in Upper Lid Surgery and Assessment With the FACE-Q Questionnaire: Innovations in Upper Blepharoplasty. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autologous vs Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty. Commentary on: The Gargano Yin Yang Breast Reduction Technique: How to Obtain Better Breast Shape, Volume Distribution, and Size With Long-Lasting Results. Bibliometric Analysis of the Highest Cited Cosmetic Upper Facial Plastic Surgery Articles Over 50 Years. Might Topical Heparin Help With Occlusion Emergencies After Accidental Intra-Arterial Hyaluronic Acid Injections?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1