B-244 新型高通量全自动血浆 GFAP 免疫测定的分析性能和方法比较评估

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.601
Z Vucetic, M Szabo, M Salvati, B Schlichtmann, J Patzlaff, D Unruh, K Curtis, L Mediger, M Nichkova-Doseva
{"title":"B-244 新型高通量全自动血浆 GFAP 免疫测定的分析性能和方法比较评估","authors":"Z Vucetic, M Szabo, M Salvati, B Schlichtmann, J Patzlaff, D Unruh, K Curtis, L Mediger, M Nichkova-Doseva","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels are shown to be an indicator of neurologic injury in conditions like Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke and as a marker of disease progression in neuromuscular disorders such as multiple sclerosis. Plasma GFAP is also implicated in detecting AD pathology, correlating to the clinical stage of the disease. The performance characteristics of the plasma GFAP immunoassay currently being developed on Beckman Coulter Access 2 and DxI 9000 analyzers are described. Methods The prototype GFAP assay is a one-step sandwich assay utilizing an anti-GFAP mouse monoclonal (MAb) antibody/alkaline phosphatase conjugate and paramagnetic particles coated with a complementary anti-GFAP mouse MAb. Sample and reactants are incubated and washed, and then a chemiluminescent substrate is added. The light generated is directly proportional to the GFAP concentration in the sample. The assay time to the first result is ∼30 minutes. Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison across different platforms was performed. 43 EDTA plasma samples, consisting of 19 Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patient samples and 24 age-matched healthy normal samples, were evaluated. Results The prototype GFAP assay has a targeted analytical measuring range of 1.0 pg/ml to approximately 700.0 pg/ml (up to 10,000 pg/ml). All normal samples were quantified with 90% measuring below 20.0 pg/ml and a low dose coefficient of variation <4.0%. A comparison of the prototype GFAP assay on DxI 9000 and Access 2 analyzers shows a Passing-Bablok slope of 0.94 (R=0.992) and an intercept of 0.37 pg/ml. Concordance analysis shows excellent agreement between the Access 2 and DxI 9000 assays. The dose ratio of the median of AD over the median of normal samples for Access 2 and DxI 9000 is 2.31 and 2.41, respectively, with AD patient median dose values of 14.3 pg/ml and 14.6 pg/mL, respectively, and normal sample median dose values of 6.2 pg/ml and 6.0 pg/mL, respectively. Conclusions The prototype GFAP assay provides fast, highly sensitive, and precise results in an automated immunoassay on the Beckman Coulter Access 2 and DxI 9000 platforms. The prototype plasma GFAP assay holds promise for diagnosing and monitoring various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"B-244 Analytical Performance and Method Comparison Evaluation of a New High Throughput Fully Automated Plasma GFAP Immunoassay\",\"authors\":\"Z Vucetic, M Szabo, M Salvati, B Schlichtmann, J Patzlaff, D Unruh, K Curtis, L Mediger, M Nichkova-Doseva\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels are shown to be an indicator of neurologic injury in conditions like Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke and as a marker of disease progression in neuromuscular disorders such as multiple sclerosis. Plasma GFAP is also implicated in detecting AD pathology, correlating to the clinical stage of the disease. The performance characteristics of the plasma GFAP immunoassay currently being developed on Beckman Coulter Access 2 and DxI 9000 analyzers are described. Methods The prototype GFAP assay is a one-step sandwich assay utilizing an anti-GFAP mouse monoclonal (MAb) antibody/alkaline phosphatase conjugate and paramagnetic particles coated with a complementary anti-GFAP mouse MAb. Sample and reactants are incubated and washed, and then a chemiluminescent substrate is added. The light generated is directly proportional to the GFAP concentration in the sample. The assay time to the first result is ∼30 minutes. Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison across different platforms was performed. 43 EDTA plasma samples, consisting of 19 Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patient samples and 24 age-matched healthy normal samples, were evaluated. Results The prototype GFAP assay has a targeted analytical measuring range of 1.0 pg/ml to approximately 700.0 pg/ml (up to 10,000 pg/ml). All normal samples were quantified with 90% measuring below 20.0 pg/ml and a low dose coefficient of variation <4.0%. A comparison of the prototype GFAP assay on DxI 9000 and Access 2 analyzers shows a Passing-Bablok slope of 0.94 (R=0.992) and an intercept of 0.37 pg/ml. Concordance analysis shows excellent agreement between the Access 2 and DxI 9000 assays. The dose ratio of the median of AD over the median of normal samples for Access 2 and DxI 9000 is 2.31 and 2.41, respectively, with AD patient median dose values of 14.3 pg/ml and 14.6 pg/mL, respectively, and normal sample median dose values of 6.2 pg/ml and 6.0 pg/mL, respectively. Conclusions The prototype GFAP assay provides fast, highly sensitive, and precise results in an automated immunoassay on the Beckman Coulter Access 2 and DxI 9000 platforms. The prototype plasma GFAP assay holds promise for diagnosing and monitoring various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.601\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和中风等情况下神经系统损伤的指标,也是多发性硬化症等神经肌肉疾病进展的标志物。血浆 GFAP 还可用于检测注意力缺失症的病理变化,并与该疾病的临床阶段相关联。本文介绍了目前正在贝克曼库尔特 Access 2 和 DxI 9000 分析仪上开发的血浆 GFAP 免疫测定的性能特点。方法 GFAP 检测原型是一种一步式夹心检测法,利用抗 GFAP 小鼠单克隆 (MAb) 抗体/碱性磷酸酶共轭物和涂有互补抗 GFAP 小鼠 MAb 的顺磁颗粒。样品和反应物经过孵育和洗涤,然后加入化学发光底物。产生的光与样品中的 GFAP 浓度成正比。检测时间为 30 分钟。对不同平台进行了分析性能评估和方法比较。对 43 份乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血浆样本进行了评估,其中包括 19 份阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者样本和 24 份年龄匹配的健康正常样本。结果 GFAP 检测原型的目标分析测量范围为 1.0 pg/ml 至约 700.0 pg/ml(高达 10,000 pg/ml)。所有正常样本均可定量,其中 90% 的测量值低于 20.0 pg/ml,低剂量变异系数<4.0%。对 DxI 9000 和 Access 2 分析仪上的原型 GFAP 分析进行比较后发现,Passing-Bablok 斜率为 0.94(R=0.992),截距为 0.37 pg/ml。一致性分析表明 Access 2 和 DxI 9000 分析仪之间的一致性非常好。Access 2 和 DxI 9000 的 AD 中位数与正常样本中位数的剂量比分别为 2.31 和 2.41,AD 患者的中位数剂量值分别为 14.3 pg/ml 和 14.6 pg/ml,正常样本的中位数剂量值分别为 6.2 pg/ml 和 6.0 pg/ml。结论 GFAP 检测原型可在 Beckman Coulter Access 2 和 DxI 9000 平台上进行自动免疫测定,结果快速、灵敏度高且精确。血浆 GFAP 检测原型有望用于诊断和监测包括 AD 在内的各种神经退行性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
B-244 Analytical Performance and Method Comparison Evaluation of a New High Throughput Fully Automated Plasma GFAP Immunoassay
Background Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) levels are shown to be an indicator of neurologic injury in conditions like Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and stroke and as a marker of disease progression in neuromuscular disorders such as multiple sclerosis. Plasma GFAP is also implicated in detecting AD pathology, correlating to the clinical stage of the disease. The performance characteristics of the plasma GFAP immunoassay currently being developed on Beckman Coulter Access 2 and DxI 9000 analyzers are described. Methods The prototype GFAP assay is a one-step sandwich assay utilizing an anti-GFAP mouse monoclonal (MAb) antibody/alkaline phosphatase conjugate and paramagnetic particles coated with a complementary anti-GFAP mouse MAb. Sample and reactants are incubated and washed, and then a chemiluminescent substrate is added. The light generated is directly proportional to the GFAP concentration in the sample. The assay time to the first result is ∼30 minutes. Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison across different platforms was performed. 43 EDTA plasma samples, consisting of 19 Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patient samples and 24 age-matched healthy normal samples, were evaluated. Results The prototype GFAP assay has a targeted analytical measuring range of 1.0 pg/ml to approximately 700.0 pg/ml (up to 10,000 pg/ml). All normal samples were quantified with 90% measuring below 20.0 pg/ml and a low dose coefficient of variation <4.0%. A comparison of the prototype GFAP assay on DxI 9000 and Access 2 analyzers shows a Passing-Bablok slope of 0.94 (R=0.992) and an intercept of 0.37 pg/ml. Concordance analysis shows excellent agreement between the Access 2 and DxI 9000 assays. The dose ratio of the median of AD over the median of normal samples for Access 2 and DxI 9000 is 2.31 and 2.41, respectively, with AD patient median dose values of 14.3 pg/ml and 14.6 pg/mL, respectively, and normal sample median dose values of 6.2 pg/ml and 6.0 pg/mL, respectively. Conclusions The prototype GFAP assay provides fast, highly sensitive, and precise results in an automated immunoassay on the Beckman Coulter Access 2 and DxI 9000 platforms. The prototype plasma GFAP assay holds promise for diagnosing and monitoring various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Gene Panels Have a Superior Diagnostic Yield for Inherited Rare Diseases Relative to Static Panels Xylazine Pharmacokinetics in Patients Testing Positive for Fentanyl and Xylazine. Prospective and External Validation of an Ensemble Learning Approach to Sensitively Detect Intravenous Fluid Contamination in Basic Metabolic Panels Niacin and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: Deciphering the Paradox. Alzheimer Disease Blood-Based Biomarkers: Translation from Research into Clinical Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1