引导式小组反思对院前急救人员发布坏消息的能力和便利性的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11604-w
Mohammad Reza Zarezadeh, Samaneh Mirzaei, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirjalili, Khadijeh Nasiriani
{"title":"引导式小组反思对院前急救人员发布坏消息的能力和便利性的影响。","authors":"Mohammad Reza Zarezadeh, Samaneh Mirzaei, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirjalili, Khadijeh Nasiriani","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11604-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bad news refers to any information that create negative changes in a person's understanding or expectations of in present and future. Breaking Bad News (BBN) is a stressful task that may have disturbing effects on the professional performance and general health of the medical staff. Pre-hospital emergency staff often needs to deliver bad news to the patient or his family. This study was conducted to determine the effect of guided group reflection training on the ability and comfort of BBN in pre-hospital emergency staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 95 staff of the pre-hospital emergency, in the test and the control groups. For the test group, a 4-hour training workshop on BBN was held, and then a group was formed in virtual space to discuss and exchange opinions about the scenarios of BBN and reflecting on it. Data collection tools were SPIKES Questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. The data were analyzed with SPSS <sub>V.18</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of the ability to BBN after the intervention was 44.01 ± 6.21 in the test group and 31.40 ± 4.51 in the control group, and a significant difference was found using the independent t-test (P = 0.0001). Besides, the mean scores of the convenience of BBN in post-test was 5.52 ± 1.64 in the test group and 3.50 ± 1.28 in the control group using the independent t-test with a significant difference (P = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the findings, training in guided group reflection improved the ability to BBN and its convenience in pre-hospital emergency staff. Therefore, it is suggested the use of this method in training for health care providers. Relating to BBN.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of guided group reflection on the ability and convenience of breaking bad news in pre-hospital emergency staff.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Reza Zarezadeh, Samaneh Mirzaei, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirjalili, Khadijeh Nasiriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11604-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bad news refers to any information that create negative changes in a person's understanding or expectations of in present and future. Breaking Bad News (BBN) is a stressful task that may have disturbing effects on the professional performance and general health of the medical staff. Pre-hospital emergency staff often needs to deliver bad news to the patient or his family. This study was conducted to determine the effect of guided group reflection training on the ability and comfort of BBN in pre-hospital emergency staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 95 staff of the pre-hospital emergency, in the test and the control groups. For the test group, a 4-hour training workshop on BBN was held, and then a group was formed in virtual space to discuss and exchange opinions about the scenarios of BBN and reflecting on it. Data collection tools were SPIKES Questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. The data were analyzed with SPSS <sub>V.18</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score of the ability to BBN after the intervention was 44.01 ± 6.21 in the test group and 31.40 ± 4.51 in the control group, and a significant difference was found using the independent t-test (P = 0.0001). Besides, the mean scores of the convenience of BBN in post-test was 5.52 ± 1.64 in the test group and 3.50 ± 1.28 in the control group using the independent t-test with a significant difference (P = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the findings, training in guided group reflection improved the ability to BBN and its convenience in pre-hospital emergency staff. Therefore, it is suggested the use of this method in training for health care providers. Relating to BBN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11604-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11604-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:坏消息是指任何会使人对现在和未来的理解或期望发生负面变化的信息。传达坏消息(BBN)是一项压力很大的工作,可能会对医务人员的专业表现和整体健康产生干扰。院前急救人员经常需要向病人或其家属传达坏消息。本研究旨在确定引导式小组反思培训对院前急救人员传递坏消息的能力和舒适度的影响:这项准实验研究在 95 名院前急救人员中进行,分为试验组和对照组。试验组举办了 4 小时的 BBN 培训班,然后在虚拟空间中组成一个小组,就 BBN 的应用场景进行讨论和交流,并对其进行反思。数据收集工具为 SPIKES 问卷和视觉模拟情绪量表。数据分析采用 SPSS V.18:干预后,试验组的 BBN 能力平均得分为(44.01±6.21)分,对照组为(31.40±4.51)分,经独立 t 检验,差异显著(P = 0.0001)。此外,经独立 t 检验,后测中 BBN 方便性的平均得分为 5.52 ± 1.64(试验组)和 3.50 ± 1.28(对照组),差异有显著性(P = 0.0001):根据研究结果,引导式小组反思培训提高了院前急救人员的BBN能力及其便利性。因此,建议在医护人员培训中使用这种方法。与 BBN 有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of guided group reflection on the ability and convenience of breaking bad news in pre-hospital emergency staff.

Background: Bad news refers to any information that create negative changes in a person's understanding or expectations of in present and future. Breaking Bad News (BBN) is a stressful task that may have disturbing effects on the professional performance and general health of the medical staff. Pre-hospital emergency staff often needs to deliver bad news to the patient or his family. This study was conducted to determine the effect of guided group reflection training on the ability and comfort of BBN in pre-hospital emergency staff.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 95 staff of the pre-hospital emergency, in the test and the control groups. For the test group, a 4-hour training workshop on BBN was held, and then a group was formed in virtual space to discuss and exchange opinions about the scenarios of BBN and reflecting on it. Data collection tools were SPIKES Questionnaire and the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. The data were analyzed with SPSS V.18.

Results: The mean score of the ability to BBN after the intervention was 44.01 ± 6.21 in the test group and 31.40 ± 4.51 in the control group, and a significant difference was found using the independent t-test (P = 0.0001). Besides, the mean scores of the convenience of BBN in post-test was 5.52 ± 1.64 in the test group and 3.50 ± 1.28 in the control group using the independent t-test with a significant difference (P = 0.0001).

Conclusion: According to the findings, training in guided group reflection improved the ability to BBN and its convenience in pre-hospital emergency staff. Therefore, it is suggested the use of this method in training for health care providers. Relating to BBN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings. Factors influencing the turnover intention for disease control and prevention workers in Northeast China: an empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia. Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study. The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1