使用靶向导管经椎间孔注射类固醇与经尾椎注射类固醇治疗腰椎病的临床效果和体格检查比较:单盲随机临床试验。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1002/brb3.70067
Farnad Imani, Faezeh Mohammad-Esmaeel, Seyedeh-Fatemeh Morsalli, Ali Ahani-Azari, Mahzad Alimian, Nasim Nikoubakht, Azadeh Emami
{"title":"使用靶向导管经椎间孔注射类固醇与经尾椎注射类固醇治疗腰椎病的临床效果和体格检查比较:单盲随机临床试验。","authors":"Farnad Imani,&nbsp;Faezeh Mohammad-Esmaeel,&nbsp;Seyedeh-Fatemeh Morsalli,&nbsp;Ali Ahani-Azari,&nbsp;Mahzad Alimian,&nbsp;Nasim Nikoubakht,&nbsp;Azadeh Emami","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The positive Lasègue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Lasègue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) number: IRCT20111102007984N31</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Farnad Imani,&nbsp;Faezeh Mohammad-Esmaeel,&nbsp;Seyedeh-Fatemeh Morsalli,&nbsp;Ali Ahani-Azari,&nbsp;Mahzad Alimian,&nbsp;Nasim Nikoubakht,&nbsp;Azadeh Emami\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The positive Lasègue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Lasègue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) number: IRCT20111102007984N31</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450248/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经椎间孔和尾部硬膜外注射是腰椎病的两种类固醇注射方法。使用靶向导管可进入受累椎弓根,并在尾部注射过程中选择性地在椎弓根旁注射类固醇,可实现经椎间孔和尾部注射两种方法的优点。本研究旨在探讨腰椎病患者经椎间孔注射类固醇与通过靶向导管经尾部注射类固醇的临床效果和体格检查:方法:将50名腰椎病患者分为经椎间孔组(T组)和经尾骨组(C组)。在透视引导下,T 组采用经椎间孔法注射类固醇,C 组采用尾侧法,在每个受累脊神经根处使用靶向导管。对四次随访(注射前、第二周、第一个月和第三个月)的疼痛强度视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、每日镇痛剂用量和体格检查进行了评估:结果:两组患者的疼痛评分(VAS)和功能障碍指数(ODI)相似,无明显差异(P>0.05)。仅在第三个月,尾椎组的 Lasègue 试验阳性率明显高于经椎间孔组(P 结论:经椎间孔组的疼痛评分和功能障碍指数均低于尾椎组(P>0.05):本研究表明,腰椎病患者接受经椎间孔注射和尾部注射类固醇(使用靶向导管)在短期内控制疼痛和改善患者功能障碍方面的效果相似。在长期(第三个月)体格检查中,尾侧组再次出现 Lasègue 试验阳性的病例,这可能表明经椎间孔方法更受青睐:伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)编号:IRCT20111102007984N31。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy.

Methods

Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated.

Results

Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The positive Lasègue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (p < 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups.

Conclusion

This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Lasègue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach.

Trial Registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) number: IRCT20111102007984N31

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1