青少年胸壁手术高位胸腔硬膜外镇痛的安全性和有效性:回顾性队列分析和新的成功率标准化定义。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002064
Steve Coppens, Geertrui Dewinter, Danny Feike Hoogma, Marc Raudsepp, Randy Vogelaerts, Liesbeth Brullot, Arne Neyrinck, Hans Van Veer, Rebekka Dreelinck, Steffen Rex
{"title":"青少年胸壁手术高位胸腔硬膜外镇痛的安全性和有效性:回顾性队列分析和新的成功率标准化定义。","authors":"Steve Coppens, Geertrui Dewinter, Danny Feike Hoogma, Marc Raudsepp, Randy Vogelaerts, Liesbeth Brullot, Arne Neyrinck, Hans Van Veer, Rebekka Dreelinck, Steffen Rex","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chest wall surgery for the correction of pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum has gained increased interest in recent years. Adequate pain treatment, respiratory physiotherapy and early ambulation are key to improving the outcomes. Although thoracic epidural analgesia is highly effective, its safety is controversial, leading to extensive scrutiny and questioning of its role.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesise that thoracic epidural analgesia is effective and well tolerated to use in adolescents, with a high success rate and low pain scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All adolescent cases in a high-volume academic tertiary chest wall surgery centre between March 1993 and December 2017 were included.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 1117 patients aged from 12 to 19 years of age and receiving either Ravvitch, Nuss or Abramson chest wall reconstruction for pectus excavatum were identified in our institutional chest wall surgery database. After applying selection and exclusion criteria, 532 patients were included in the current analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary endpoint of this study was the safety of epidural analgesia, assessed by the incidence of acute adverse events. Secondary endpoints were block success rates using a specific novel definition, and analgesic efficacy using recorded postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 60% of patients experienced one or more adverse events. However, all events were minor and without consequences. No serious or long-term adverse events were detected. The success rate of thoracic epidural placement was 81%. Low postoperative pain scores were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic epidural analgesia is an extremely effective pain control technique, with a surprisingly high number of minor adverse events but safe with regard to serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The local research ethics committee approved and registered this study on 16 May 2022 (registration number: S66594).</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"873-880"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of high thoracic epidural analgesia for chest wall surgery in young adolescents: A retrospective cohort analysis and a new standardised definition for success rate.\",\"authors\":\"Steve Coppens, Geertrui Dewinter, Danny Feike Hoogma, Marc Raudsepp, Randy Vogelaerts, Liesbeth Brullot, Arne Neyrinck, Hans Van Veer, Rebekka Dreelinck, Steffen Rex\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chest wall surgery for the correction of pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum has gained increased interest in recent years. Adequate pain treatment, respiratory physiotherapy and early ambulation are key to improving the outcomes. Although thoracic epidural analgesia is highly effective, its safety is controversial, leading to extensive scrutiny and questioning of its role.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesise that thoracic epidural analgesia is effective and well tolerated to use in adolescents, with a high success rate and low pain scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All adolescent cases in a high-volume academic tertiary chest wall surgery centre between March 1993 and December 2017 were included.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 1117 patients aged from 12 to 19 years of age and receiving either Ravvitch, Nuss or Abramson chest wall reconstruction for pectus excavatum were identified in our institutional chest wall surgery database. After applying selection and exclusion criteria, 532 patients were included in the current analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary endpoint of this study was the safety of epidural analgesia, assessed by the incidence of acute adverse events. Secondary endpoints were block success rates using a specific novel definition, and analgesic efficacy using recorded postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 60% of patients experienced one or more adverse events. However, all events were minor and without consequences. No serious or long-term adverse events were detected. The success rate of thoracic epidural placement was 81%. Low postoperative pain scores were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic epidural analgesia is an extremely effective pain control technique, with a surprisingly high number of minor adverse events but safe with regard to serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The local research ethics committee approved and registered this study on 16 May 2022 (registration number: S66594).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"873-880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,通过胸壁手术矫正胸大肌或贲门失弛缓症越来越受到关注。充分的疼痛治疗、呼吸理疗和早期下床活动是提高疗效的关键。虽然胸腔硬膜外镇痛效果显著,但其安全性却备受争议,这导致了对其作用的广泛关注和质疑:我们假设胸腔硬膜外镇痛对青少年有效且耐受性好,成功率高且疼痛评分低:观察性回顾性队列研究:纳入1993年3月至2017年12月期间一家高容量学术三级胸壁外科中心的所有青少年病例:在我们机构的胸壁外科数据库中,共确定了1117名年龄在12至19岁之间、因乳房下垂而接受Ravvitch、Nuss或Abramson胸壁重建术的患者。在应用选择和排除标准后,532 名患者被纳入本次分析:本研究的主要终点是硬膜外镇痛的安全性,根据急性不良事件的发生率进行评估。次要终点是使用特定新定义的阻滞成功率,以及使用术后疼痛评分记录的镇痛效果:结果:超过 60% 的患者出现了一种或多种不良反应。结果:超过 60% 的患者出现过一次或多次不良反应,但所有不良反应均为轻微且无后果。未发现严重或长期不良事件。胸腔硬膜外置管的成功率为 81%。术后疼痛评分较低:胸腔硬膜外镇痛是一种非常有效的疼痛控制技术,轻微不良反应的发生率高得惊人,但严重不良反应的发生率却很安全:当地研究伦理委员会于 2022 年 5 月 16 日批准并注册了这项研究(注册号:S66594)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of high thoracic epidural analgesia for chest wall surgery in young adolescents: A retrospective cohort analysis and a new standardised definition for success rate.

Background: Chest wall surgery for the correction of pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum has gained increased interest in recent years. Adequate pain treatment, respiratory physiotherapy and early ambulation are key to improving the outcomes. Although thoracic epidural analgesia is highly effective, its safety is controversial, leading to extensive scrutiny and questioning of its role.

Objectives: We hypothesise that thoracic epidural analgesia is effective and well tolerated to use in adolescents, with a high success rate and low pain scores.

Design: Observational retrospective cohort study.

Setting: All adolescent cases in a high-volume academic tertiary chest wall surgery centre between March 1993 and December 2017 were included.

Patients: A total of 1117 patients aged from 12 to 19 years of age and receiving either Ravvitch, Nuss or Abramson chest wall reconstruction for pectus excavatum were identified in our institutional chest wall surgery database. After applying selection and exclusion criteria, 532 patients were included in the current analysis.

Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint of this study was the safety of epidural analgesia, assessed by the incidence of acute adverse events. Secondary endpoints were block success rates using a specific novel definition, and analgesic efficacy using recorded postoperative pain scores.

Results: More than 60% of patients experienced one or more adverse events. However, all events were minor and without consequences. No serious or long-term adverse events were detected. The success rate of thoracic epidural placement was 81%. Low postoperative pain scores were observed.

Conclusion: Thoracic epidural analgesia is an extremely effective pain control technique, with a surprisingly high number of minor adverse events but safe with regard to serious adverse events.

Trial registration: The local research ethics committee approved and registered this study on 16 May 2022 (registration number: S66594).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
期刊最新文献
A big little problem - postoperative nausea and vomiting incidences are too low! Is it time to add the letter E to the airway management guidelines? Is permissive hypercapnia really pneumoprotective? Reply to: importance of accounting for repeated measure designs when evaluating treatment effects at multiple postoperative days. Rethinking the utility of comparative studies between direct and video laryngoscopy in neonates and infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1