Ivanéia V Nunes, Luisa Breitenbach, Sarah Pawusch, Tatjana Eigenbrod, Swetha Ananth, Paulina Schad, Oliver T Fackler, Falk Butter, Alexander H Dalpke, Lan-Sun Chen
{"title":"TLR8 对细菌 RNA 的感应需要 RNase 6 处理,并受到 RNA 2'O- 甲基化的抑制。","authors":"Ivanéia V Nunes, Luisa Breitenbach, Sarah Pawusch, Tatjana Eigenbrod, Swetha Ananth, Paulina Schad, Oliver T Fackler, Falk Butter, Alexander H Dalpke, Lan-Sun Chen","doi":"10.1038/s44319-024-00281-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>TLR8 senses single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) fragments, processed via cleavage by ribonuclease (RNase) T2 and RNase A family members. Processing by these RNases releases uridines and purine-terminated residues resulting in TLR8 activation. Monocytes show high expression of RNase 6, yet this RNase has not been analyzed for its physiological contribution to the recognition of bacterial RNA by TLR8. Here, we show a role for RNase 6 in TLR8 activation. BLaER1 cells, transdifferentiated into monocyte-like cells, as well as primary monocytes deficient for RNASE6 show a dampened TLR8-dependent response upon stimulation with isolated bacterial RNA (bRNA) and also upon infection with live bacteria. Pretreatment of bacterial RNA with recombinant RNase 6 generates fragments that induce TLR8 stimulation in RNase 6 knockout cells. 2'O-RNA methyl modification, when introduced at the first uridine in the UA dinucleotide, impairs processing by RNase 6 and dampens TLR8 stimulation. In summary, our data show that RNase 6 processes bacterial RNA and generates uridine-terminated breakdown products that activate TLR8.</p>","PeriodicalId":11541,"journal":{"name":"EMBO Reports","volume":" ","pages":"4674-4692"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial RNA sensing by TLR8 requires RNase 6 processing and is inhibited by RNA 2'O-methylation.\",\"authors\":\"Ivanéia V Nunes, Luisa Breitenbach, Sarah Pawusch, Tatjana Eigenbrod, Swetha Ananth, Paulina Schad, Oliver T Fackler, Falk Butter, Alexander H Dalpke, Lan-Sun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44319-024-00281-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>TLR8 senses single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) fragments, processed via cleavage by ribonuclease (RNase) T2 and RNase A family members. Processing by these RNases releases uridines and purine-terminated residues resulting in TLR8 activation. Monocytes show high expression of RNase 6, yet this RNase has not been analyzed for its physiological contribution to the recognition of bacterial RNA by TLR8. Here, we show a role for RNase 6 in TLR8 activation. BLaER1 cells, transdifferentiated into monocyte-like cells, as well as primary monocytes deficient for RNASE6 show a dampened TLR8-dependent response upon stimulation with isolated bacterial RNA (bRNA) and also upon infection with live bacteria. Pretreatment of bacterial RNA with recombinant RNase 6 generates fragments that induce TLR8 stimulation in RNase 6 knockout cells. 2'O-RNA methyl modification, when introduced at the first uridine in the UA dinucleotide, impairs processing by RNase 6 and dampens TLR8 stimulation. In summary, our data show that RNase 6 processes bacterial RNA and generates uridine-terminated breakdown products that activate TLR8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMBO Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4674-4692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMBO Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-024-00281-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMBO Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-024-00281-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bacterial RNA sensing by TLR8 requires RNase 6 processing and is inhibited by RNA 2'O-methylation.
TLR8 senses single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) fragments, processed via cleavage by ribonuclease (RNase) T2 and RNase A family members. Processing by these RNases releases uridines and purine-terminated residues resulting in TLR8 activation. Monocytes show high expression of RNase 6, yet this RNase has not been analyzed for its physiological contribution to the recognition of bacterial RNA by TLR8. Here, we show a role for RNase 6 in TLR8 activation. BLaER1 cells, transdifferentiated into monocyte-like cells, as well as primary monocytes deficient for RNASE6 show a dampened TLR8-dependent response upon stimulation with isolated bacterial RNA (bRNA) and also upon infection with live bacteria. Pretreatment of bacterial RNA with recombinant RNase 6 generates fragments that induce TLR8 stimulation in RNase 6 knockout cells. 2'O-RNA methyl modification, when introduced at the first uridine in the UA dinucleotide, impairs processing by RNase 6 and dampens TLR8 stimulation. In summary, our data show that RNase 6 processes bacterial RNA and generates uridine-terminated breakdown products that activate TLR8.
期刊介绍:
EMBO Reports is a scientific journal that specializes in publishing research articles in the fields of molecular biology, cell biology, and developmental biology. The journal is known for its commitment to publishing high-quality, impactful research that provides novel physiological and functional insights. These insights are expected to be supported by robust evidence, with independent lines of inquiry validating the findings.
The journal's scope includes both long and short-format papers, catering to different types of research contributions. It values studies that:
Communicate major findings: Articles that report significant discoveries or advancements in the understanding of biological processes at the molecular, cellular, and developmental levels.
Confirm important findings: Research that validates or supports existing knowledge in the field, reinforcing the reliability of previous studies.
Refute prominent claims: Studies that challenge or disprove widely accepted ideas or hypotheses in the biosciences, contributing to the correction and evolution of scientific understanding.
Present null data: Papers that report negative results or findings that do not support a particular hypothesis, which are crucial for the scientific process as they help to refine or redirect research efforts.
EMBO Reports is dedicated to maintaining high standards of scientific rigor and integrity, ensuring that the research it publishes contributes meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge in the life sciences. By covering a broad spectrum of topics and encouraging the publication of both positive and negative results, the journal plays a vital role in promoting a comprehensive and balanced view of scientific inquiry.