评估扎韦格潘与舒马曲坦之间的药代动力学和药效学相互作用:一项针对健康成年人的 1 期随机安慰剂对照研究。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1111/head.14853
Rajinder Bhardwaj, Mary K Donohue, Jennifer Madonia, Kyle Matschke, Matt S Anderson, Beth Morris, Richard Bertz, Robert Croop, Jing Liu
{"title":"评估扎韦格潘与舒马曲坦之间的药代动力学和药效学相互作用:一项针对健康成年人的 1 期随机安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Rajinder Bhardwaj, Mary K Donohue, Jennifer Madonia, Kyle Matschke, Matt S Anderson, Beth Morris, Richard Bertz, Robert Croop, Jing Liu","doi":"10.1111/head.14853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan in healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Zavegepant is a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine. Triptans, including sumatriptan, are a different class of drugs for acute migraine treatment and are associated with a risk of increased blood pressure (BP). Hence, it is important to study the drug-drug interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan due to potential coadministration in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a Phase 1, single-center, partially blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-arm study. Eligible participants were males aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 years or females aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years. On Day 1, participants received sumatriptan 2 × 6 mg subcutaneous injections (1 h apart) and were then randomized (6:1 ratio) to receive zavegepant 2 × 10 mg nasal spray (1 in each nostril) or placebo on Days 2 and 3. On Day 4, zavegepant or placebo was coadministered with sumatriptan after the second sumatriptan injection. BP, PK, and safety were evaluated at pre-specified time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two participants enrolled in the study received at least one dose of any treatment and were included in the safety analyses. Forty-one participants who completed the study were included in the BP and PK analyses. The mean (standard deviation) time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 87.2 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 86.9 (6.0)]), diastolic BP (DBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 72.3 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 72.1 (6.2)]), and systolic BP (SBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 116.8 (10.2) vs. sumatriptan 116.2 (8.6)]) did not change following zavegepant and sumatriptan coadministration on Day 4 compared to sumatriptan alone on Day 1. Statistical comparisons of the TWA of MAP, DBP, and SBP between sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration and sumatriptan alone were similar; the differences observed were 0.04 mmHg for MAP (90% confidence interval [CI]: -0.69, 0.77 mmHg), 0.00 mmHg for DBP (90% CI: -0.76, 0.76 mmHg), and 0.33 mmHg for SBP (90% CI: -0.97, 1.63 mmHg). Sumatriptan PK after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus sumatriptan alone was similar; the comparison ratios were 102.5% (90% CI: 100.7%, 104.2%) for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> and 104.1% (90% CI: 98.0%, 110.6%) for C<sub>max</sub>. A small difference in zavegepant PK exposure after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus zavegepant alone was not considered clinically relevant: the comparison ratios were 112.4% (90% CI: 103.4%, 122.3%) for AUC<sub>0-24</sub> and 96.7% (90% CI: 88.9%, 105.2%) for C<sub>max</sub>. Overall, 90% (38/42) of participants experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event that was mild or moderate in severity. All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coadministration of zavegepant with sumatriptan was safe and without PD or PK interactions in healthy adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan: A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults.\",\"authors\":\"Rajinder Bhardwaj, Mary K Donohue, Jennifer Madonia, Kyle Matschke, Matt S Anderson, Beth Morris, Richard Bertz, Robert Croop, Jing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan in healthy adults.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Zavegepant is a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine. Triptans, including sumatriptan, are a different class of drugs for acute migraine treatment and are associated with a risk of increased blood pressure (BP). Hence, it is important to study the drug-drug interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan due to potential coadministration in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a Phase 1, single-center, partially blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-arm study. Eligible participants were males aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 years or females aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years. On Day 1, participants received sumatriptan 2 × 6 mg subcutaneous injections (1 h apart) and were then randomized (6:1 ratio) to receive zavegepant 2 × 10 mg nasal spray (1 in each nostril) or placebo on Days 2 and 3. On Day 4, zavegepant or placebo was coadministered with sumatriptan after the second sumatriptan injection. BP, PK, and safety were evaluated at pre-specified time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two participants enrolled in the study received at least one dose of any treatment and were included in the safety analyses. Forty-one participants who completed the study were included in the BP and PK analyses. The mean (standard deviation) time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 87.2 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 86.9 (6.0)]), diastolic BP (DBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 72.3 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 72.1 (6.2)]), and systolic BP (SBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 116.8 (10.2) vs. sumatriptan 116.2 (8.6)]) did not change following zavegepant and sumatriptan coadministration on Day 4 compared to sumatriptan alone on Day 1. Statistical comparisons of the TWA of MAP, DBP, and SBP between sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration and sumatriptan alone were similar; the differences observed were 0.04 mmHg for MAP (90% confidence interval [CI]: -0.69, 0.77 mmHg), 0.00 mmHg for DBP (90% CI: -0.76, 0.76 mmHg), and 0.33 mmHg for SBP (90% CI: -0.97, 1.63 mmHg). Sumatriptan PK after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus sumatriptan alone was similar; the comparison ratios were 102.5% (90% CI: 100.7%, 104.2%) for AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> and 104.1% (90% CI: 98.0%, 110.6%) for C<sub>max</sub>. A small difference in zavegepant PK exposure after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus zavegepant alone was not considered clinically relevant: the comparison ratios were 112.4% (90% CI: 103.4%, 122.3%) for AUC<sub>0-24</sub> and 96.7% (90% CI: 88.9%, 105.2%) for C<sub>max</sub>. Overall, 90% (38/42) of participants experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event that was mild or moderate in severity. All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coadministration of zavegepant with sumatriptan was safe and without PD or PK interactions in healthy adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14853\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估zavegepant和舒马曲坦在健康成人中的药效学(PD)和药代动力学(PK)相互作用:评估zavegepant和舒马曲坦在健康成人中的药效学(PD)和药代动力学(PK)相互作用:背景:Zavegepant 是一种高亲和性、选择性、小分子降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂,在美国被批准作为鼻腔喷雾剂用于偏头痛的急性治疗。包括舒马曲坦在内的曲坦类药物是治疗急性偏头痛的另一类药物,与血压(BP)升高的风险有关。因此,研究zavegepant和舒马曲普坦在临床上可能联合用药时的药物相互作用非常重要:这是一项第一阶段、单中心、部分盲法、随机、安慰剂对照、单臂研究。符合条件的参与者为年龄≥18岁且≤40岁的男性或年龄≥18岁且≤50岁的女性。第1天,参与者接受舒马曲坦2×6毫克皮下注射(间隔1小时),然后在第2天和第3天随机(6:1比例)接受扎韦格潘2×10毫克鼻腔喷雾剂(每个鼻孔1支)或安慰剂。第 4 天,在第二次注射舒马曲普坦后,zavegepant 或安慰剂与舒马曲普坦同时给药。在预先指定的时间点对血压、PK 和安全性进行评估:42名参加研究的人员至少接受了一次治疗,并纳入了安全性分析。41名完成研究的参与者参与了血压和 PK 分析。平均动脉压(MAP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 87.2 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 86.9 (6.0)])、舒张压(DBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 72.3 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 72.1(6.2)])和收缩压(SBP [舒马曲普坦 + 扎韦格潘 116.8(10.2) vs. 舒马曲普坦 116.2(8.6)])在第 4 天联合使用扎韦格潘和舒马曲普坦后与第 1 天单独使用舒马曲普坦相比没有变化。对舒马曲普坦和扎韦格潘联合用药与单用舒马曲普坦之间的MAP、DBP和SBP的TWA进行的统计比较结果相似;观察到的差异为:MAP为0.04毫米汞柱(90%置信区间[CI]:-0.69,0.77毫米汞柱),DBP为0.00毫米汞柱(90%置信区间:-0.76,0.76毫米汞柱),SBP为0.33毫米汞柱(90%置信区间:-0.97,1.63毫米汞柱)。舒马曲普坦与扎韦格潘联合用药后的舒马曲普坦PK与单用舒马曲普坦的PK相似;AUC0-inf的比较比率为102.5%(90% CI:100.7%,104.2%),Cmax的比较比率为104.1%(90% CI:98.0%,110.6%)。舒马曲普坦和扎韦格潘联合用药后扎韦格潘的PK暴露量与单独用药后扎韦格潘的PK暴露量之间的微小差异被认为与临床无关:AUC0-24的比较比率为112.4%(90% CI:103.4%,122.3%),Cmax的比较比率为96.7%(90% CI:88.9%,105.2%)。总体而言,90%(38/42)的参与者经历了≥1次轻度或中度的治疗突发不良事件。所有治疗总体上安全且耐受性良好:结论:在健康成年人中,zavegepant与舒马曲普坦联合用药是安全的,并且不存在PD或PK相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan: A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults.

Objective: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan in healthy adults.

Background: Zavegepant is a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine. Triptans, including sumatriptan, are a different class of drugs for acute migraine treatment and are associated with a risk of increased blood pressure (BP). Hence, it is important to study the drug-drug interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan due to potential coadministration in clinical settings.

Methods: This was a Phase 1, single-center, partially blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-arm study. Eligible participants were males aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 years or females aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years. On Day 1, participants received sumatriptan 2 × 6 mg subcutaneous injections (1 h apart) and were then randomized (6:1 ratio) to receive zavegepant 2 × 10 mg nasal spray (1 in each nostril) or placebo on Days 2 and 3. On Day 4, zavegepant or placebo was coadministered with sumatriptan after the second sumatriptan injection. BP, PK, and safety were evaluated at pre-specified time points.

Results: Forty-two participants enrolled in the study received at least one dose of any treatment and were included in the safety analyses. Forty-one participants who completed the study were included in the BP and PK analyses. The mean (standard deviation) time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 87.2 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 86.9 (6.0)]), diastolic BP (DBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 72.3 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 72.1 (6.2)]), and systolic BP (SBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 116.8 (10.2) vs. sumatriptan 116.2 (8.6)]) did not change following zavegepant and sumatriptan coadministration on Day 4 compared to sumatriptan alone on Day 1. Statistical comparisons of the TWA of MAP, DBP, and SBP between sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration and sumatriptan alone were similar; the differences observed were 0.04 mmHg for MAP (90% confidence interval [CI]: -0.69, 0.77 mmHg), 0.00 mmHg for DBP (90% CI: -0.76, 0.76 mmHg), and 0.33 mmHg for SBP (90% CI: -0.97, 1.63 mmHg). Sumatriptan PK after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus sumatriptan alone was similar; the comparison ratios were 102.5% (90% CI: 100.7%, 104.2%) for AUC0-inf and 104.1% (90% CI: 98.0%, 110.6%) for Cmax. A small difference in zavegepant PK exposure after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus zavegepant alone was not considered clinically relevant: the comparison ratios were 112.4% (90% CI: 103.4%, 122.3%) for AUC0-24 and 96.7% (90% CI: 88.9%, 105.2%) for Cmax. Overall, 90% (38/42) of participants experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event that was mild or moderate in severity. All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.

Conclusion: Coadministration of zavegepant with sumatriptan was safe and without PD or PK interactions in healthy adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1