颈静脉狭窄与自发性脊髓脑脊液漏:病例对照研究:探讨关联性和拟议机制

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1177/15910199241287417
Sasicha Manupipatpong, Christopher T Primiani, Kyle M Fargen, Matthew R Amans, Linda Leithe, Wouter I Schievink, Mark G Luciano, Ferdinand K Hui
{"title":"颈静脉狭窄与自发性脊髓脑脊液漏:病例对照研究:探讨关联性和拟议机制","authors":"Sasicha Manupipatpong, Christopher T Primiani, Kyle M Fargen, Matthew R Amans, Linda Leithe, Wouter I Schievink, Mark G Luciano, Ferdinand K Hui","doi":"10.1177/15910199241287417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs) are associated with increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and hypothesized to relate to skull base erosions due to increased CSF pressure. Given the increasing recognition of internal jugular venous stenosis (IJVS) as a cause of intracranial hypertension (IH), we evaluated the relationship between spinal CSFL and venous causes of IH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The spinal CSFL database at a single institution was assessed to identify 12 consecutive spontaneous, non-traumatic spinal CSFL patients with CTV data. Exclusion criteria included documented IIH and iatrogenic CSFL. Demographics, clinical parameters, imaging characteristics, and IJV manometry results were recorded. Internal jugular venous stenosis was graded as: none (0-10%), mild (10-50%), moderate (50-80%), severe (>80-99%), and occluded (100%). Twelve consecutive patients who presented with cerebrovascular accidents without CSFL, matched by age and sex, were similarly analyzed as a control group. STROBE guidelines were used in reporting results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All CSFL patients had IJVS (83.3% bilateral, 33.3% severe) compared to 41.7% of the control group (33.3% bilateral, 16.7% severe-occluded); <i>p</i> = 0.04. All CSFL patients with available venogram manometry data had at least unilateral IJV gradients. Most patients presented with modified Rankin score (mRS) of 1 (66.7%), but in those with higher mRS, medical and/or surgical interventions were associated with decreased morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spontaneous spinal CSFL was associated with IJVS in patients not meeting IIH criteria. Persistently high CSF pressure resulting in CSFL may cause opening pressure to be falsely normal or low. Internal jugular venous stenosis may be a viable target in recurrent CSFL management and improve morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jugular venous narrowing and spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: A case-control study exploring association and proposed mechanism.\",\"authors\":\"Sasicha Manupipatpong, Christopher T Primiani, Kyle M Fargen, Matthew R Amans, Linda Leithe, Wouter I Schievink, Mark G Luciano, Ferdinand K Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241287417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs) are associated with increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and hypothesized to relate to skull base erosions due to increased CSF pressure. Given the increasing recognition of internal jugular venous stenosis (IJVS) as a cause of intracranial hypertension (IH), we evaluated the relationship between spinal CSFL and venous causes of IH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The spinal CSFL database at a single institution was assessed to identify 12 consecutive spontaneous, non-traumatic spinal CSFL patients with CTV data. Exclusion criteria included documented IIH and iatrogenic CSFL. Demographics, clinical parameters, imaging characteristics, and IJV manometry results were recorded. Internal jugular venous stenosis was graded as: none (0-10%), mild (10-50%), moderate (50-80%), severe (>80-99%), and occluded (100%). Twelve consecutive patients who presented with cerebrovascular accidents without CSFL, matched by age and sex, were similarly analyzed as a control group. STROBE guidelines were used in reporting results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All CSFL patients had IJVS (83.3% bilateral, 33.3% severe) compared to 41.7% of the control group (33.3% bilateral, 16.7% severe-occluded); <i>p</i> = 0.04. All CSFL patients with available venogram manometry data had at least unilateral IJV gradients. Most patients presented with modified Rankin score (mRS) of 1 (66.7%), but in those with higher mRS, medical and/or surgical interventions were associated with decreased morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spontaneous spinal CSFL was associated with IJVS in patients not meeting IIH criteria. Persistently high CSF pressure resulting in CSFL may cause opening pressure to be falsely normal or low. Internal jugular venous stenosis may be a viable target in recurrent CSFL management and improve morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241287417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241287417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自发性颅底脑脊液漏(CSFLs)与特发性颅内高压症(IIH)的颅内压增高有关,并被假设与CSF压力增高导致的颅底侵蚀有关。鉴于越来越多的人认识到颈内静脉狭窄(IJVS)是导致颅内高压(IH)的原因之一,我们评估了脊髓CSFL与静脉原因导致的IH之间的关系:方法: 我们对一家医疗机构的脊柱CSFL数据库进行了评估,以确定12例连续的自发性、非创伤性脊柱CSFL患者的CTV数据。排除标准包括有记录的 IIH 和先天性 CSFL。研究人员记录了患者的人口统计学特征、临床参数、影像学特征和颈内静脉测压结果。颈内静脉狭窄分为:无(0-10%)、轻度(10-50%)、中度(50-80%)、重度(>80-99%)和闭塞(100%)。作为对照组,对 12 名连续出现脑血管意外但无 CSFL 的患者进行了类似分析,这些患者的年龄和性别与对照组相匹配。结果报告采用了 STROBE 指南:所有 CSFL 患者都有 IJVS(83.3% 双侧,33.3% 严重),而对照组中只有 41.7%(33.3% 双侧,16.7% 严重闭塞);P = 0.04。所有有静脉造影测压数据的 CSFL 患者都至少有单侧 IJV 梯度。大多数患者的改良Rankin评分(mRS)为1(66.7%),但在mRS较高的患者中,药物和/或手术干预与发病率的降低有关:结论:在不符合 IIH 标准的患者中,自发性脊髓 CSFL 与 IJVS 有关。CSFL导致的持续高CSF压力可能会使开放压假性正常或偏低。颈内静脉狭窄可能是治疗复发性 CSFL 的可行目标,并可改善发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jugular venous narrowing and spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks: A case-control study exploring association and proposed mechanism.

Background: Spontaneous skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs) are associated with increased intracranial pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and hypothesized to relate to skull base erosions due to increased CSF pressure. Given the increasing recognition of internal jugular venous stenosis (IJVS) as a cause of intracranial hypertension (IH), we evaluated the relationship between spinal CSFL and venous causes of IH.

Methods: The spinal CSFL database at a single institution was assessed to identify 12 consecutive spontaneous, non-traumatic spinal CSFL patients with CTV data. Exclusion criteria included documented IIH and iatrogenic CSFL. Demographics, clinical parameters, imaging characteristics, and IJV manometry results were recorded. Internal jugular venous stenosis was graded as: none (0-10%), mild (10-50%), moderate (50-80%), severe (>80-99%), and occluded (100%). Twelve consecutive patients who presented with cerebrovascular accidents without CSFL, matched by age and sex, were similarly analyzed as a control group. STROBE guidelines were used in reporting results.

Results: All CSFL patients had IJVS (83.3% bilateral, 33.3% severe) compared to 41.7% of the control group (33.3% bilateral, 16.7% severe-occluded); p = 0.04. All CSFL patients with available venogram manometry data had at least unilateral IJV gradients. Most patients presented with modified Rankin score (mRS) of 1 (66.7%), but in those with higher mRS, medical and/or surgical interventions were associated with decreased morbidity.

Conclusion: Spontaneous spinal CSFL was associated with IJVS in patients not meeting IIH criteria. Persistently high CSF pressure resulting in CSFL may cause opening pressure to be falsely normal or low. Internal jugular venous stenosis may be a viable target in recurrent CSFL management and improve morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Balloon angioplasty for cerebral vasospasm in preschool children. Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience. Validity of Woven EndoBridge sizing based on the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio. Accelerated aspiration with Q™ catheter: An in vitro study. High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1