IPF 患者不使用抗纤维化药物的相关因素。

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory investigation Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.008
{"title":"IPF 患者不使用抗纤维化药物的相关因素。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The efficacy of antifibrotic agents in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been demonstrated and early introduction is recommended, especially in patients with preserved performance status (PS). We aimed to determine the proportion of untreated IPF cases using real-world data and to assess the factors associated with non-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective observational study using questionnaires was performed on 518 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and their attending physicians who visited a clinic, general hospital, or tertiary respiratory center between December 2019 and October 2020. Patients responded with subjective symptoms and PS, whereas physicians responded with diagnosis, treatment, and reasons for their treatment choices. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using age, sex, BMI, medical facility, specialized tests, and symptom severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 207 patients with IPF. Among them, 168 has a good PS (≤2), which could be indicative of treatment; 130 (77.4%) were not treated with antifibrotic agents. The PCA revealed a trend consistent with that of antifibrotic agent therapy and the distribution of medical facilities, with a treatment intervention rate of 16% in general hospitals and 62% in tertiary respiratory centers. In general hospitals, low symptom severity (PS, mMRC, and no use of long-term oxygen therapy) was a relevant factor for non-intervention with antifibrotic agents (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Antifibrotic treatment interventions varied by facility in cases with good PS. Patients with milder symptoms are not being treated early in general hospitals and more collaboration between general hospitals and specialized facilities is necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with non-intervention of antifibrotic agents in IPF patients\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The efficacy of antifibrotic agents in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been demonstrated and early introduction is recommended, especially in patients with preserved performance status (PS). We aimed to determine the proportion of untreated IPF cases using real-world data and to assess the factors associated with non-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective observational study using questionnaires was performed on 518 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and their attending physicians who visited a clinic, general hospital, or tertiary respiratory center between December 2019 and October 2020. Patients responded with subjective symptoms and PS, whereas physicians responded with diagnosis, treatment, and reasons for their treatment choices. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using age, sex, BMI, medical facility, specialized tests, and symptom severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 207 patients with IPF. Among them, 168 has a good PS (≤2), which could be indicative of treatment; 130 (77.4%) were not treated with antifibrotic agents. The PCA revealed a trend consistent with that of antifibrotic agent therapy and the distribution of medical facilities, with a treatment intervention rate of 16% in general hospitals and 62% in tertiary respiratory centers. In general hospitals, low symptom severity (PS, mMRC, and no use of long-term oxygen therapy) was a relevant factor for non-intervention with antifibrotic agents (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Antifibrotic treatment interventions varied by facility in cases with good PS. Patients with milder symptoms are not being treated early in general hospitals and more collaboration between general hospitals and specialized facilities is necessary.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory investigation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524001473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524001473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗纤维化药物对特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的疗效已得到证实,建议尽早使用,尤其是对表现状态(PS)保持良好的患者。我们旨在利用真实世界的数据确定未经治疗的 IPF 病例比例,并评估与不干预相关的因素:2019年12月至2020年10月期间,我们对在诊所、综合医院或三级呼吸中心就诊的518名间质性肺病(ILD)患者及其主治医生进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,采用问卷调查的方式。患者回答了主观症状和 PS,而医生则回答了诊断、治疗和选择治疗的原因。利用年龄、性别、体重指数、医疗机构、专业检查和症状严重程度进行了主成分分析(PCA):我们共纳入了 207 名 IPF 患者。其中,168 名患者的 PS 值良好(≤2),这可能是治疗的指标;130 名患者(77.4%)未接受抗纤维化药物治疗。PCA显示的趋势与抗纤维化药物治疗和医疗机构分布一致,综合医院的治疗干预率为16%,三级呼吸中心为62%。在综合医院,症状严重程度低(PS、mMRC 和未使用长期氧疗)是不干预抗纤维化药物治疗的一个相关因素(P 结论:在综合医院和三级呼吸中心,抗纤维化药物治疗干预率分别为 16%和 62%:在 PS 良好的病例中,抗纤维化治疗干预因医疗机构而异。综合医院没有对症状较轻的患者进行早期治疗,因此综合医院和专科医院之间有必要加强合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors associated with non-intervention of antifibrotic agents in IPF patients

Background

The efficacy of antifibrotic agents in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been demonstrated and early introduction is recommended, especially in patients with preserved performance status (PS). We aimed to determine the proportion of untreated IPF cases using real-world data and to assess the factors associated with non-intervention.

Methods

A prospective observational study using questionnaires was performed on 518 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and their attending physicians who visited a clinic, general hospital, or tertiary respiratory center between December 2019 and October 2020. Patients responded with subjective symptoms and PS, whereas physicians responded with diagnosis, treatment, and reasons for their treatment choices. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using age, sex, BMI, medical facility, specialized tests, and symptom severity.

Results

We included 207 patients with IPF. Among them, 168 has a good PS (≤2), which could be indicative of treatment; 130 (77.4%) were not treated with antifibrotic agents. The PCA revealed a trend consistent with that of antifibrotic agent therapy and the distribution of medical facilities, with a treatment intervention rate of 16% in general hospitals and 62% in tertiary respiratory centers. In general hospitals, low symptom severity (PS, mMRC, and no use of long-term oxygen therapy) was a relevant factor for non-intervention with antifibrotic agents (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Antifibrotic treatment interventions varied by facility in cases with good PS. Patients with milder symptoms are not being treated early in general hospitals and more collaboration between general hospitals and specialized facilities is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic significance of oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen 3 days after initiation of tocilizumab treatment in patients with COVID-19 Efficacy and safety of mucolytics in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Pulmonary fibrosis in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis evaluated by transbronchial lung cryobiopsy: A single-center retrospective study Therapeutic effects of an ALK inhibitor, brigatinib, on lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with EML4-ALK fusion Reclassification of items in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire: Correlation analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1