Nabagata G Chaudhuri, Banibrata Lahiri, Nivea T Francis, Haifa Beefathimathul, John Francis, Deepika R Pai
{"title":"各种化学表面处理后丙烯酸牙齿与义齿基托粘接强度的评估:体外研究。","authors":"Nabagata G Chaudhuri, Banibrata Lahiri, Nivea T Francis, Haifa Beefathimathul, John Francis, Deepika R Pai","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to assess the bonding capacity and efficacy of acrylic teeth to denture bases following two different chemical surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A two-metal mold measuring 35 mm in length and 12 mm in diameter was created specifically for the investigation in order to standardize the wax pattern-based tooth attachment at 45°. Following standard protocol, 75 wax cylinder specimens were flasked, dewaxed, and surface treatment of teeth was done as follows with 25 samples in each group-group I: control group, group II: monomethyl methacrylate monomer group, group III: acetone group. The curing process was completed following the packing of the denture base material. The samples' shear bond strength was assessed using a universal testing machine. Every sample was taken out when it fractured, and the shear load (Newton, N) was noted. The significance of the variation in applied shear load was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <i>post hoc</i> ANOVA Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test at the 5% level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum shear bond strength was found in the samples treated with acetone (183.21 ± 0.06) followed by samples treated with monomethyl methacrylate monomer (171.64 ± 0.12) and the control group (149.32 ± 0.04). A statistically significant difference was found between the different groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, according to the current study's findings, acetone chemical surface treatment of acrylic teeth produced the strongest bond when compared with the control group and monomethyl methacrylate monomer.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In prosthodontic practice, artificial teeth regularly de-bond and separate from the denture base. A weak interface is produced when certain clinical conditions, such as ridge prominence, cause excessive cutting of the acrylic teeth and base. Where the denture base polymer meets the teeth's highly cross-linked matrix, it de-bonds adhesively. Therefore, the bonding between the acrylic teeth and the denture base material can be improved by the chemical surface treatment. How to cite this article: Chaudhuri NG, Lahiri B, Francis NT, et al. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base after Various Chemical Surface Treatments: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):514-517.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 6","pages":"514-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base after Various Chemical Surface Treatments: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nabagata G Chaudhuri, Banibrata Lahiri, Nivea T Francis, Haifa Beefathimathul, John Francis, Deepika R Pai\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to assess the bonding capacity and efficacy of acrylic teeth to denture bases following two different chemical surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A two-metal mold measuring 35 mm in length and 12 mm in diameter was created specifically for the investigation in order to standardize the wax pattern-based tooth attachment at 45°. Following standard protocol, 75 wax cylinder specimens were flasked, dewaxed, and surface treatment of teeth was done as follows with 25 samples in each group-group I: control group, group II: monomethyl methacrylate monomer group, group III: acetone group. The curing process was completed following the packing of the denture base material. The samples' shear bond strength was assessed using a universal testing machine. Every sample was taken out when it fractured, and the shear load (Newton, N) was noted. The significance of the variation in applied shear load was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <i>post hoc</i> ANOVA Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test at the 5% level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum shear bond strength was found in the samples treated with acetone (183.21 ± 0.06) followed by samples treated with monomethyl methacrylate monomer (171.64 ± 0.12) and the control group (149.32 ± 0.04). A statistically significant difference was found between the different groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, according to the current study's findings, acetone chemical surface treatment of acrylic teeth produced the strongest bond when compared with the control group and monomethyl methacrylate monomer.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In prosthodontic practice, artificial teeth regularly de-bond and separate from the denture base. A weak interface is produced when certain clinical conditions, such as ridge prominence, cause excessive cutting of the acrylic teeth and base. Where the denture base polymer meets the teeth's highly cross-linked matrix, it de-bonds adhesively. Therefore, the bonding between the acrylic teeth and the denture base material can be improved by the chemical surface treatment. How to cite this article: Chaudhuri NG, Lahiri B, Francis NT, et al. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base after Various Chemical Surface Treatments: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):514-517.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"514-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base after Various Chemical Surface Treatments: An In Vitro Study.
Aim: The purpose of the present study was to assess the bonding capacity and efficacy of acrylic teeth to denture bases following two different chemical surface treatments.
Materials and methods: A two-metal mold measuring 35 mm in length and 12 mm in diameter was created specifically for the investigation in order to standardize the wax pattern-based tooth attachment at 45°. Following standard protocol, 75 wax cylinder specimens were flasked, dewaxed, and surface treatment of teeth was done as follows with 25 samples in each group-group I: control group, group II: monomethyl methacrylate monomer group, group III: acetone group. The curing process was completed following the packing of the denture base material. The samples' shear bond strength was assessed using a universal testing machine. Every sample was taken out when it fractured, and the shear load (Newton, N) was noted. The significance of the variation in applied shear load was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc ANOVA Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test at the 5% level of significance.
Results: The maximum shear bond strength was found in the samples treated with acetone (183.21 ± 0.06) followed by samples treated with monomethyl methacrylate monomer (171.64 ± 0.12) and the control group (149.32 ± 0.04). A statistically significant difference was found between the different groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In conclusion, according to the current study's findings, acetone chemical surface treatment of acrylic teeth produced the strongest bond when compared with the control group and monomethyl methacrylate monomer.
Clinical significance: In prosthodontic practice, artificial teeth regularly de-bond and separate from the denture base. A weak interface is produced when certain clinical conditions, such as ridge prominence, cause excessive cutting of the acrylic teeth and base. Where the denture base polymer meets the teeth's highly cross-linked matrix, it de-bonds adhesively. Therefore, the bonding between the acrylic teeth and the denture base material can be improved by the chemical surface treatment. How to cite this article: Chaudhuri NG, Lahiri B, Francis NT, et al. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Acrylic Teeth to Denture Base after Various Chemical Surface Treatments: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):514-517.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.