多即是少:图像增强技术减少了前路腰椎椎间融合术的辐射暴露。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.026
Brian Kuhn, Joel Hlavaty, Patrick Muck, Matthew Recht, Aaron Kulwicki, Mark Broering, Adam Reichard
{"title":"多即是少:图像增强技术减少了前路腰椎椎间融合术的辐射暴露。","authors":"Brian Kuhn, Joel Hlavaty, Patrick Muck, Matthew Recht, Aaron Kulwicki, Mark Broering, Adam Reichard","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Fluoroscopy and radiation exposure occur during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Image enhancement technology is available that can potentially reduce radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times comparing standard fluoroscopy (FL) with a low dose image enhancement platform (LD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing ALIF with either standard fluoroscopy or low dose image enhancement technology.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Radiation dispersion and fluoroscopy times in ALIF patients with standard fluoroscopy and low dose image enhancement technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a prospective database on consecutive patients who have undergone ALIF, stratified into 2 groups: subjects with standard fluoroscopy (FL), and low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology (LD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 487 ALIF patients were included (FL: 372 vs. LD: 115). LD patients were significantly older (66 vs. 60 years), with more deformity cases (28% vs. 12%), and less degenerative cases (71% vs. 87%), all p<.05; no differences in sex, BMI, or the number of levels operated on between groups. Fluoroscopy time (sec) was significantly higher in LD (51.4 vs. 45.5), with a statistically significant reduction in radiation (mGy) compared to FL (23.3 vs. 48.2), both p<.05. Furthermore, the results showed that radiation dispersion is increasingly reduced as fluoroscopy time increases in LD compared to FL (12%, 56%, and 65% reduction in radiation dispersion for fluoroscopy time <30 sec, between 30 to 60 sec, and >60 sec, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology significantly reduces the cumulative dose of radiation during ALIF compared to standard dose fluoroscopy. Also, radiation dispersion increasingly decreases as fluoroscopy time increases using low dose image enhancement technology. Low dose image enhancement technology improves the safety profile of ALIF for patients and operating room staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More is less: image enhancement technology reduces radiation exposure during anterior lumber interbody fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Kuhn, Joel Hlavaty, Patrick Muck, Matthew Recht, Aaron Kulwicki, Mark Broering, Adam Reichard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Fluoroscopy and radiation exposure occur during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Image enhancement technology is available that can potentially reduce radiation exposure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times comparing standard fluoroscopy (FL) with a low dose image enhancement platform (LD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing ALIF with either standard fluoroscopy or low dose image enhancement technology.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Radiation dispersion and fluoroscopy times in ALIF patients with standard fluoroscopy and low dose image enhancement technology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of a prospective database on consecutive patients who have undergone ALIF, stratified into 2 groups: subjects with standard fluoroscopy (FL), and low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology (LD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 487 ALIF patients were included (FL: 372 vs. LD: 115). LD patients were significantly older (66 vs. 60 years), with more deformity cases (28% vs. 12%), and less degenerative cases (71% vs. 87%), all p<.05; no differences in sex, BMI, or the number of levels operated on between groups. Fluoroscopy time (sec) was significantly higher in LD (51.4 vs. 45.5), with a statistically significant reduction in radiation (mGy) compared to FL (23.3 vs. 48.2), both p<.05. Furthermore, the results showed that radiation dispersion is increasingly reduced as fluoroscopy time increases in LD compared to FL (12%, 56%, and 65% reduction in radiation dispersion for fluoroscopy time <30 sec, between 30 to 60 sec, and >60 sec, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology significantly reduces the cumulative dose of radiation during ALIF compared to standard dose fluoroscopy. Also, radiation dispersion increasingly decreases as fluoroscopy time increases using low dose image enhancement technology. Low dose image enhancement technology improves the safety profile of ALIF for patients and operating room staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景情况:前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)过程中会出现透视和辐射暴露。目的:本研究旨在评估标准透视(FL)与低剂量图像增强平台(LD)相比的辐射暴露和透视时间:研究设计:对前瞻性数据库进行回顾性审查:使用标准透视或低剂量图像增强技术进行 ALIF 手术的连续患者:采用标准透视和低剂量图像增强技术的ALIF患者的辐射弥散和透视时间 方法:对前瞻性数据库中连续接受ALIF手术的患者进行回顾性分析,分为两组:采用标准透视(FL)的患者和采用图像增强技术的低剂量透视(LD)患者:结果:共纳入 487 名 ALIF 患者(FL:372 人;LD:115 人)。LD患者的年龄明显偏大(66岁 vs 60岁),畸形病例较多(28% vs 12%),退行性病例较少(71% vs 87%),所有P分别为60秒:结论:与标准剂量透视相比,使用图像增强技术的低剂量透视可显著降低 ALIF 期间的累积辐射剂量。此外,使用低剂量图像增强技术,随着透视时间的延长,辐射弥散也会越来越小。低剂量图像增强技术提高了 ALIF 对患者和手术室工作人员的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More is less: image enhancement technology reduces radiation exposure during anterior lumber interbody fusion.

Background context: Fluoroscopy and radiation exposure occur during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Image enhancement technology is available that can potentially reduce radiation exposure.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times comparing standard fluoroscopy (FL) with a low dose image enhancement platform (LD).

Study design: Retrospective review of prospectively maintained database.

Patient sample: Consecutive patients undergoing ALIF with either standard fluoroscopy or low dose image enhancement technology.

Outcome measures: Radiation dispersion and fluoroscopy times in ALIF patients with standard fluoroscopy and low dose image enhancement technology.

Methods: A retrospective review of a prospective database on consecutive patients who have undergone ALIF, stratified into 2 groups: subjects with standard fluoroscopy (FL), and low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology (LD).

Results: A total of 487 ALIF patients were included (FL: 372 vs. LD: 115). LD patients were significantly older (66 vs. 60 years), with more deformity cases (28% vs. 12%), and less degenerative cases (71% vs. 87%), all p<.05; no differences in sex, BMI, or the number of levels operated on between groups. Fluoroscopy time (sec) was significantly higher in LD (51.4 vs. 45.5), with a statistically significant reduction in radiation (mGy) compared to FL (23.3 vs. 48.2), both p<.05. Furthermore, the results showed that radiation dispersion is increasingly reduced as fluoroscopy time increases in LD compared to FL (12%, 56%, and 65% reduction in radiation dispersion for fluoroscopy time <30 sec, between 30 to 60 sec, and >60 sec, respectively).

Conclusions: The use of low dose fluoroscopy with image enhancement technology significantly reduces the cumulative dose of radiation during ALIF compared to standard dose fluoroscopy. Also, radiation dispersion increasingly decreases as fluoroscopy time increases using low dose image enhancement technology. Low dose image enhancement technology improves the safety profile of ALIF for patients and operating room staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Frailty and Malnutrition as Predictors of Major Complications Following Posterior Thoracolumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Back Pain in Patients with Macromastia: What a Spine Surgeon Should Know. Glycemic Laboratory Values Are Associated With Increased Length of Stay and 90-Day Revision Risk Following Surgical Management of Adult Spinal Deformity. Is it safe to treat osteoporotic burst thoracolumbar fracture using percutaneous vertebroplasty? A minimum of five-year follow-up study. Low pelvic incidence as a risk factor for vertebral recollapse after percutaneous vertebroplasty in the thoracolumbar region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1