Katrina Knight , Sophya Breedlove , Temitope Obisesan , Morgan Egnot , Niusha Daneshdoost , Gabrielle King , Leslie Meyn , Ken Gall , Pamela Moalli
{"title":"阴道宿主对聚碳酸酯尿烷的反应,一种用于修复盆腔器官脱垂的替代材料。","authors":"Katrina Knight , Sophya Breedlove , Temitope Obisesan , Morgan Egnot , Niusha Daneshdoost , Gabrielle King , Leslie Meyn , Ken Gall , Pamela Moalli","doi":"10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Complications following surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with polypropylene mesh (PPM) are common. Recent data attributes complications, in part, to stiffness mismatches between the vagina and PPM. We developed a 3D printed elastomeric membrane (EM) from a softer polymer, polycarbonate urethane (PCU). EMs were manufactured with more material given the low inherent material strength of PCU. We hypothesized that the EMs would be associated with an improved host response as compared to PPM. A secondary goal was to optimize the material distribution (fiber width and device thickness) within EMs, in regards to the host response. EM constructs (2 × 1 cm<sup>2</sup>) with varied polymer stiffness, fiber width, and device thickness were implanted onto the vagina of New Zealand white rabbits for 12 weeks and compared to similarly sized PPMs. Sham implanted animals served as controls. Mixed effects generalized linear models were used to compare the effect of construct type accounting for differences in independent variables. EMs had an overall superior host response compared to PPM as evidenced by preservation of vaginal smooth muscle morphology (<em>p</em>-values<0.01), decreased total cellular response to construct fibers (<em>p</em>-values<0.001), and a reduced percent of macrophages (<em>p</em>-values<0.02) independent of how the material was distributed. Both PPM and EMs negatively impacted vaginal contractility and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content relative to Sham (all <em>p</em>-values<0.001) with EMs having less of an impact on GAGs (<em>p</em>-values<0.003). The results suggest that softer PCU EMs made with more material are well tolerated by the vagina and comprises a future material for POP repair devices.</div></div><div><h3>Statement of significance</h3><div>Prolapse is a debilitating condition in which loss of support to the vagina causes it and the organs supported by it to descend from their normal position in the pelvis. Surgical solutions to rebuild support involves the use of polypropylene mesh which is orders of magnitude stiffer than the vagina. This mismatch results in complications including exposure of the mesh into the vagina and pain. To provide an innovative solution for women, we have developed an elastomeric membrane from a soft polymer that matches the stiffness of the vagina. Here, we show in a rabbit animal model that this device incorporates better into the vagina and is associated with an overall improved host response as compared to polypropylene mesh.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":237,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomaterialia","volume":"189 ","pages":"Pages 298-310"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaginal host response to polycarbonate urethane, an alternative material for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse\",\"authors\":\"Katrina Knight , Sophya Breedlove , Temitope Obisesan , Morgan Egnot , Niusha Daneshdoost , Gabrielle King , Leslie Meyn , Ken Gall , Pamela Moalli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Complications following surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with polypropylene mesh (PPM) are common. Recent data attributes complications, in part, to stiffness mismatches between the vagina and PPM. We developed a 3D printed elastomeric membrane (EM) from a softer polymer, polycarbonate urethane (PCU). EMs were manufactured with more material given the low inherent material strength of PCU. We hypothesized that the EMs would be associated with an improved host response as compared to PPM. A secondary goal was to optimize the material distribution (fiber width and device thickness) within EMs, in regards to the host response. EM constructs (2 × 1 cm<sup>2</sup>) with varied polymer stiffness, fiber width, and device thickness were implanted onto the vagina of New Zealand white rabbits for 12 weeks and compared to similarly sized PPMs. Sham implanted animals served as controls. Mixed effects generalized linear models were used to compare the effect of construct type accounting for differences in independent variables. EMs had an overall superior host response compared to PPM as evidenced by preservation of vaginal smooth muscle morphology (<em>p</em>-values<0.01), decreased total cellular response to construct fibers (<em>p</em>-values<0.001), and a reduced percent of macrophages (<em>p</em>-values<0.02) independent of how the material was distributed. Both PPM and EMs negatively impacted vaginal contractility and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content relative to Sham (all <em>p</em>-values<0.001) with EMs having less of an impact on GAGs (<em>p</em>-values<0.003). The results suggest that softer PCU EMs made with more material are well tolerated by the vagina and comprises a future material for POP repair devices.</div></div><div><h3>Statement of significance</h3><div>Prolapse is a debilitating condition in which loss of support to the vagina causes it and the organs supported by it to descend from their normal position in the pelvis. Surgical solutions to rebuild support involves the use of polypropylene mesh which is orders of magnitude stiffer than the vagina. This mismatch results in complications including exposure of the mesh into the vagina and pain. To provide an innovative solution for women, we have developed an elastomeric membrane from a soft polymer that matches the stiffness of the vagina. Here, we show in a rabbit animal model that this device incorporates better into the vagina and is associated with an overall improved host response as compared to polypropylene mesh.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomaterialia\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 298-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomaterialia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706124005658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706124005658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
使用聚丙烯网片(PPM)进行盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术修复后,并发症很常见。最新数据显示,并发症的部分原因是阴道和聚丙烯网片之间的硬度不匹配。我们用一种较软的聚合物聚碳酸酯聚氨酯(PCU)开发了一种三维打印弹性膜(EM)。由于 PCU 的固有材料强度较低,我们在制造 EM 时使用了更多的材料。我们假设,与 PPM 相比,EM 会改善宿主反应。我们的第二个目标是优化 EM 内的材料分布(纤维宽度和器件厚度),以改善宿主反应。将具有不同聚合物硬度、纤维宽度和装置厚度的 EM 构造(2×1cm2)植入新西兰白兔的阴道 12 周,并与类似大小的 PPM 进行比较。假体植入动物作为对照组。混合效应广义线性模型用于比较结构类型对自变量差异的影响。与 PPM 相比,EMs 在总体上具有更优越的宿主反应,这体现在阴道平滑肌形态的保留上(p 值
Vaginal host response to polycarbonate urethane, an alternative material for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse
Complications following surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with polypropylene mesh (PPM) are common. Recent data attributes complications, in part, to stiffness mismatches between the vagina and PPM. We developed a 3D printed elastomeric membrane (EM) from a softer polymer, polycarbonate urethane (PCU). EMs were manufactured with more material given the low inherent material strength of PCU. We hypothesized that the EMs would be associated with an improved host response as compared to PPM. A secondary goal was to optimize the material distribution (fiber width and device thickness) within EMs, in regards to the host response. EM constructs (2 × 1 cm2) with varied polymer stiffness, fiber width, and device thickness were implanted onto the vagina of New Zealand white rabbits for 12 weeks and compared to similarly sized PPMs. Sham implanted animals served as controls. Mixed effects generalized linear models were used to compare the effect of construct type accounting for differences in independent variables. EMs had an overall superior host response compared to PPM as evidenced by preservation of vaginal smooth muscle morphology (p-values<0.01), decreased total cellular response to construct fibers (p-values<0.001), and a reduced percent of macrophages (p-values<0.02) independent of how the material was distributed. Both PPM and EMs negatively impacted vaginal contractility and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content relative to Sham (all p-values<0.001) with EMs having less of an impact on GAGs (p-values<0.003). The results suggest that softer PCU EMs made with more material are well tolerated by the vagina and comprises a future material for POP repair devices.
Statement of significance
Prolapse is a debilitating condition in which loss of support to the vagina causes it and the organs supported by it to descend from their normal position in the pelvis. Surgical solutions to rebuild support involves the use of polypropylene mesh which is orders of magnitude stiffer than the vagina. This mismatch results in complications including exposure of the mesh into the vagina and pain. To provide an innovative solution for women, we have developed an elastomeric membrane from a soft polymer that matches the stiffness of the vagina. Here, we show in a rabbit animal model that this device incorporates better into the vagina and is associated with an overall improved host response as compared to polypropylene mesh.
期刊介绍:
Acta Biomaterialia is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Elsevier. The journal was established in January 2005. The editor-in-chief is W.R. Wagner (University of Pittsburgh). The journal covers research in biomaterials science, including the interrelationship of biomaterial structure and function from macroscale to nanoscale. Topical coverage includes biomedical and biocompatible materials.