压力荷尔蒙会影响选择吗?对 HPA 轴和/或 SAM 系统进行药物干预的系统回顾。

Luis Felipe Sarmiento, Jorge Alexander Ríos-Flórez, Fabio Alexis Rincón Uribe, Rafael Rodrigues Lima, Tobias Kalenscher, Amauri Gouveia, Felix Jan Nitsch
{"title":"压力荷尔蒙会影响选择吗?对 HPA 轴和/或 SAM 系统进行药物干预的系统回顾。","authors":"Luis Felipe Sarmiento, Jorge Alexander Ríos-Flórez, Fabio Alexis Rincón Uribe, Rafael Rodrigues Lima, Tobias Kalenscher, Amauri Gouveia, Felix Jan Nitsch","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system (SAM system), two neuroendocrine systems associated with the stress response, have often been implicated to modulate decision-making in various domains. This systematic review summarizes the scientific evidence on the effects of pharmacological HPA axis and SAM system modulation on decision-making. We found 6375 references, of which 17 studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We quantified the risk of bias in our results with respect to missing outcome data, measurements, and selection of the reported results. The included studies administered hydrocortisone, fludrocortisone (HPA axis stimulants), yohimbine, reboxetine (SAM system stimulants), and/or propranolol (SAM system inhibitor). Integrating the evidence, we found that SAM system stimulation had no impact on risk aversion, loss aversion or intertemporal choice, while SAM system inhibition showed a tentative reduction in sensitivity to losses. HPA axis stimulation had no effect on loss aversion or reward anticipation but likely a time-dependent effect on decision under risk. Lastly, combined stimulation of both systems exhibited inconsistent results that could be explained by dose differences (loss aversion) and sex differences (risk aversion). Future research should address time-, dose-, and sex-dependencies of pharmacological effects on decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do stress hormones influence choice? A systematic review of pharmacological interventions on the HPA axis and/or SAM system.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Felipe Sarmiento, Jorge Alexander Ríos-Flórez, Fabio Alexis Rincón Uribe, Rafael Rodrigues Lima, Tobias Kalenscher, Amauri Gouveia, Felix Jan Nitsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/scan/nsae069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system (SAM system), two neuroendocrine systems associated with the stress response, have often been implicated to modulate decision-making in various domains. This systematic review summarizes the scientific evidence on the effects of pharmacological HPA axis and SAM system modulation on decision-making. We found 6375 references, of which 17 studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We quantified the risk of bias in our results with respect to missing outcome data, measurements, and selection of the reported results. The included studies administered hydrocortisone, fludrocortisone (HPA axis stimulants), yohimbine, reboxetine (SAM system stimulants), and/or propranolol (SAM system inhibitor). Integrating the evidence, we found that SAM system stimulation had no impact on risk aversion, loss aversion or intertemporal choice, while SAM system inhibition showed a tentative reduction in sensitivity to losses. HPA axis stimulation had no effect on loss aversion or reward anticipation but likely a time-dependent effect on decision under risk. Lastly, combined stimulation of both systems exhibited inconsistent results that could be explained by dose differences (loss aversion) and sex differences (risk aversion). Future research should address time-, dose-, and sex-dependencies of pharmacological effects on decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴(HPA 轴)和交感-肾上腺-髓质系统(SAM 系统)是与应激反应相关的两个神经内分泌系统,经常被认为可调节不同领域的决策。本系统性综述总结了有关药物调节 HPA 轴和 SAM 系统对决策影响的科学证据。我们找到了 6375 篇参考文献,其中 17 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们对结果数据缺失、测量和报告结果选择方面的偏倚风险进行了量化。纳入的研究使用了氢化可的松、氟氢可的松(HPA 轴兴奋剂)、育亨宾、雷贝西汀(SAM 系统兴奋剂)和/或普萘洛尔(SAM 系统抑制剂)。综合这些证据,我们发现刺激SAM系统对风险规避、损失规避或时际选择没有影响,而抑制SAM系统则暂时降低了对损失的敏感性。刺激 HPA 轴对损失规避或奖励预期没有影响,但对风险决策的影响可能与时间有关。最后,对这两个系统的联合刺激显示出不一致的结果,这可以用剂量差异(损失厌恶)和性别差异(风险厌恶)来解释。未来的研究应该解决药理作用对决策的时间、剂量和性别依赖性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do stress hormones influence choice? A systematic review of pharmacological interventions on the HPA axis and/or SAM system.

The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system (SAM system), two neuroendocrine systems associated with the stress response, have often been implicated to modulate decision-making in various domains. This systematic review summarizes the scientific evidence on the effects of pharmacological HPA axis and SAM system modulation on decision-making. We found 6375 references, of which 17 studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We quantified the risk of bias in our results with respect to missing outcome data, measurements, and selection of the reported results. The included studies administered hydrocortisone, fludrocortisone (HPA axis stimulants), yohimbine, reboxetine (SAM system stimulants), and/or propranolol (SAM system inhibitor). Integrating the evidence, we found that SAM system stimulation had no impact on risk aversion, loss aversion or intertemporal choice, while SAM system inhibition showed a tentative reduction in sensitivity to losses. HPA axis stimulation had no effect on loss aversion or reward anticipation but likely a time-dependent effect on decision under risk. Lastly, combined stimulation of both systems exhibited inconsistent results that could be explained by dose differences (loss aversion) and sex differences (risk aversion). Future research should address time-, dose-, and sex-dependencies of pharmacological effects on decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain encoding during perceived control as a prospective predictor of improvement in quality of life. Mother-Child Closeness and Adolescent Structural Neural Networks: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Low-Income Families. Neural bases of social facilitation and inhibition: how peer presence affects elementary eye movements. Empathy enhances decoding accuracy of human neurophysiological responses to emotional facial expressions of humans and dogs. Pain modulates brain potentials and behavioral responses to unfairness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1