Andrew Strohman , Gabriel Isaac , Brighton Payne , Charles Verdonk , Sahib S. Khalsa , Wynn Legon
{"title":"低强度聚焦超声波对岛叶的心跳诱发电位有不同程度的调节作用:概念验证研究","authors":"Andrew Strohman , Gabriel Isaac , Brighton Payne , Charles Verdonk , Sahib S. Khalsa , Wynn Legon","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) is a brain response time-locked to the heartbeat and a potential marker of interoceptive processing that may be generated in the insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can selectively modulate sub-regions of the insula and dACC to better understand their contributions to the HEP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy participants (<em>n</em> = 16) received stereotaxically targeted LIFU to the anterior insula (AI), posterior insula (PI), dACC, or Sham at rest during continuous electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) recording on separate days. Primary outcome was HEP amplitudes. Relationships between LIFU pressure and HEP changes and effects of LIFU on heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) were also explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Relative to sham, LIFU to the PI, but not AI or dACC, decreased HEP amplitudes; PI effects were partially explained by increased LIFU pressure. LIFU did not affect heart rate or HRV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results demonstrate the ability to modulate HEP amplitudes via non-invasive targeting of key interoceptive brain regions.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our findings have implications for the causal role of these areas in bottom-up heart-brain communication that could guide future work investigating the HEP as a marker of interoceptive processing in healthy and clinical populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"167 ","pages":"Pages 267-281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-intensity focused ultrasound to the insula differentially modulates the heartbeat-evoked potential: A proof-of-concept study\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Strohman , Gabriel Isaac , Brighton Payne , Charles Verdonk , Sahib S. Khalsa , Wynn Legon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) is a brain response time-locked to the heartbeat and a potential marker of interoceptive processing that may be generated in the insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can selectively modulate sub-regions of the insula and dACC to better understand their contributions to the HEP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy participants (<em>n</em> = 16) received stereotaxically targeted LIFU to the anterior insula (AI), posterior insula (PI), dACC, or Sham at rest during continuous electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) recording on separate days. Primary outcome was HEP amplitudes. Relationships between LIFU pressure and HEP changes and effects of LIFU on heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) were also explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Relative to sham, LIFU to the PI, but not AI or dACC, decreased HEP amplitudes; PI effects were partially explained by increased LIFU pressure. LIFU did not affect heart rate or HRV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results demonstrate the ability to modulate HEP amplitudes via non-invasive targeting of key interoceptive brain regions.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our findings have implications for the causal role of these areas in bottom-up heart-brain communication that could guide future work investigating the HEP as a marker of interoceptive processing in healthy and clinical populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 267-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:心跳诱发电位(HEP心跳诱发电位(HEP)是一种与心跳时间锁定的大脑反应,也是可能在脑岛和背侧前扣带回皮层(dACC)中产生的感知间处理的潜在标记。低强度聚焦超声(LIFU)可选择性地调节岛叶和dACC的子区域,从而更好地了解它们对HEP的贡献。方法:健康参与者(n = 16)在连续脑电图(EEG)和心电图(ECG)记录期间,分别在前岛叶(AI)、后岛叶(PI)、dACC或静息时接受立体定向LIFU。主要结果是HEP振幅。此外,还探讨了 LIFU 压力与 HEP 变化之间的关系,以及 LIFU 对心率和心率变异性(HRV)的影响:结果:与假性相比,LIFU 对 PI(而非 AI 或 dACC)的影响降低了 HEP 波幅;LIFU 压力的增加部分解释了对 PI 的影响。LIFU 不影响心率或心率变异:这些结果表明,通过对关键的感知间脑区进行非侵入性靶向治疗,能够调节 HEP 波幅:我们的研究结果对这些区域在自下而上的心脑交流中的因果作用具有重要意义,可指导未来研究 HEP 作为健康和临床人群感知间处理标记的工作。
Low-intensity focused ultrasound to the insula differentially modulates the heartbeat-evoked potential: A proof-of-concept study
Objective
The heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) is a brain response time-locked to the heartbeat and a potential marker of interoceptive processing that may be generated in the insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) can selectively modulate sub-regions of the insula and dACC to better understand their contributions to the HEP.
Methods
Healthy participants (n = 16) received stereotaxically targeted LIFU to the anterior insula (AI), posterior insula (PI), dACC, or Sham at rest during continuous electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) recording on separate days. Primary outcome was HEP amplitudes. Relationships between LIFU pressure and HEP changes and effects of LIFU on heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) were also explored.
Results
Relative to sham, LIFU to the PI, but not AI or dACC, decreased HEP amplitudes; PI effects were partially explained by increased LIFU pressure. LIFU did not affect heart rate or HRV.
Conclusions
These results demonstrate the ability to modulate HEP amplitudes via non-invasive targeting of key interoceptive brain regions.
Significance
Our findings have implications for the causal role of these areas in bottom-up heart-brain communication that could guide future work investigating the HEP as a marker of interoceptive processing in healthy and clinical populations.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.