Ulver S. Lorenzen , Marta I. Bracco , Alexander H. Zielinski , Magdalena Broda , Stéphane Avril , Laurence Rouet , Jonas P. Eiberg , The COACH Research Collaborative
{"title":"利用超声波应变模式评估腹主动脉瘤血管壁生物力学。","authors":"Ulver S. Lorenzen , Marta I. Bracco , Alexander H. Zielinski , Magdalena Broda , Stéphane Avril , Laurence Rouet , Jonas P. Eiberg , The COACH Research Collaborative","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%–10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern “topography” (i.e., curve phases or “peaks” and “valleys”) had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029–0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's <em>ρ</em> = 0.02, false discovery rate-<em>p</em> = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strain Patterns With Ultrasound for Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Vessel Wall Biomechanics\",\"authors\":\"Ulver S. Lorenzen , Marta I. Bracco , Alexander H. Zielinski , Magdalena Broda , Stéphane Avril , Laurence Rouet , Jonas P. Eiberg , The COACH Research Collaborative\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%–10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern “topography” (i.e., curve phases or “peaks” and “valleys”) had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029–0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's <em>ρ</em> = 0.02, false discovery rate-<em>p</em> = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strain Patterns With Ultrasound for Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Vessel Wall Biomechanics
Background
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%–10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility.
Methods
In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics.
Results
Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern “topography” (i.e., curve phases or “peaks” and “valleys”) had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029–0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's ρ = 0.02, false discovery rate-p = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg).
Discussion
Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.