基于机器学习的计算机断层扫描放射组学在估计化疗后结直肠癌肝转移病理反应方面优于放射医师评估

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-15373-y
Georgios Karagkounis, Natally Horvat, Sofia Danilova, Salini Chhabra, Raja R Narayan, Ahmad B Barekzai, Adam Kleshchelski, Chou Joanne, Mithat Gonen, Vinod Balachandran, Kevin C Soares, Alice C Wei, T Peter Kingham, William R Jarnagin, Jinru Shia, Jayasree Chakraborty, Michael I D'Angelica
{"title":"基于机器学习的计算机断层扫描放射组学在估计化疗后结直肠癌肝转移病理反应方面优于放射医师评估","authors":"Georgios Karagkounis, Natally Horvat, Sofia Danilova, Salini Chhabra, Raja R Narayan, Ahmad B Barekzai, Adam Kleshchelski, Chou Joanne, Mithat Gonen, Vinod Balachandran, Kevin C Soares, Alice C Wei, T Peter Kingham, William R Jarnagin, Jinru Shia, Jayasree Chakraborty, Michael I D'Angelica","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-15373-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to assess computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), extracted from posttreatment scans in estimating pathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy, and to compare treatment response estimates between CT-based radiomics and radiological response assessment by using RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent resection for CRLM from January 2003-December 2012 at a single institution were included. Patients who did not receive preoperative systemic chemotherapy, or without adequate imaging, were excluded. Imaging characteristics were evaluated based on RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria. A machine-learning model was designed with radiomic features extracted from manually segmented posttreatment CT tumoral and peritumoral regions to identify pathologic responders (≥ 50% response) versus nonresponders. Statistical analysis was performed at the tumor level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients (median age, 62 years; 55 women) with 95 tumors were included. None of the subjectively evaluated imaging characteristics were associated with pathologic response (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for RECIST categorical response assessment (K = 0.70) and moderate for CT morphological group response (K = 0.50). In the validation cohort, the machine learning model built with radiomic features obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 and outperformed subjective RECIST assessment (AUC = 0.53, p = 0.01) and morphologic assessment (AUC = 0.56, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiologist assessment of oligometastatic CRLM after neoadjuvant therapy using RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria was not associated with pathologic response. In contrast, a machine-learning model based on radiomic features extracted from tumoral and peritumoral regions had high diagnostic performance in assessing responders versus nonresponders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"9196-9204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics with Machine Learning Outperforms Radiologist Assessment in Estimating Colorectal Liver Metastases Pathologic Response After Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Karagkounis, Natally Horvat, Sofia Danilova, Salini Chhabra, Raja R Narayan, Ahmad B Barekzai, Adam Kleshchelski, Chou Joanne, Mithat Gonen, Vinod Balachandran, Kevin C Soares, Alice C Wei, T Peter Kingham, William R Jarnagin, Jinru Shia, Jayasree Chakraborty, Michael I D'Angelica\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-024-15373-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to assess computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), extracted from posttreatment scans in estimating pathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy, and to compare treatment response estimates between CT-based radiomics and radiological response assessment by using RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent resection for CRLM from January 2003-December 2012 at a single institution were included. Patients who did not receive preoperative systemic chemotherapy, or without adequate imaging, were excluded. Imaging characteristics were evaluated based on RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria. A machine-learning model was designed with radiomic features extracted from manually segmented posttreatment CT tumoral and peritumoral regions to identify pathologic responders (≥ 50% response) versus nonresponders. Statistical analysis was performed at the tumor level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients (median age, 62 years; 55 women) with 95 tumors were included. None of the subjectively evaluated imaging characteristics were associated with pathologic response (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for RECIST categorical response assessment (K = 0.70) and moderate for CT morphological group response (K = 0.50). In the validation cohort, the machine learning model built with radiomic features obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 and outperformed subjective RECIST assessment (AUC = 0.53, p = 0.01) and morphologic assessment (AUC = 0.56, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiologist assessment of oligometastatic CRLM after neoadjuvant therapy using RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria was not associated with pathologic response. In contrast, a machine-learning model based on radiomic features extracted from tumoral and peritumoral regions had high diagnostic performance in assessing responders versus nonresponders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9196-9204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15373-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15373-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估从治疗后扫描中提取的基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的结直肠肝转移瘤(CRLM)放射组学在估计新辅助治疗的病理治疗反应方面的作用,并比较基于CT的放射组学与使用RECIST 1.1和CT形态学标准进行的放射学反应评估之间的治疗反应估计:纳入2003年1月至2012年12月在一家机构接受CRLM切除术的患者。排除未接受术前全身化疗或未进行充分影像学检查的患者。成像特征根据 RECIST 1.1 和 CT 形态学标准进行评估。利用从人工分割的治疗后 CT 肿瘤和瘤周区域提取的放射学特征设计了一个机器学习模型,以识别病理应答者(应答率≥50%)和非应答者。统计分析在肿瘤层面进行:85名患者(中位年龄62岁;55名女性)共95个肿瘤。主观评估的成像特征均与病理反应无关(P > 0.05)。对于 RECIST 分类反应评估,阅片员之间的一致性很高(K = 0.70),而对于 CT 形态组反应,阅片员之间的一致性为中等(K = 0.50)。在验证队列中,利用放射学特征建立的机器学习模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.87,优于主观RECIST评估(AUC = 0.53,p = 0.01)和形态学评估(AUC = 0.56,p = 0.02):结论:放射科医生使用RECIST 1.1和CT形态学标准评估新辅助治疗后少转移CRLM与病理反应无关。相反,基于从肿瘤和瘤周区域提取的放射学特征的机器学习模型在评估应答者和非应答者时具有很高的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics with Machine Learning Outperforms Radiologist Assessment in Estimating Colorectal Liver Metastases Pathologic Response After Chemotherapy.

Objectives: This study was designed to assess computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), extracted from posttreatment scans in estimating pathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant therapy, and to compare treatment response estimates between CT-based radiomics and radiological response assessment by using RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria.

Methods: Patients who underwent resection for CRLM from January 2003-December 2012 at a single institution were included. Patients who did not receive preoperative systemic chemotherapy, or without adequate imaging, were excluded. Imaging characteristics were evaluated based on RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria. A machine-learning model was designed with radiomic features extracted from manually segmented posttreatment CT tumoral and peritumoral regions to identify pathologic responders (≥ 50% response) versus nonresponders. Statistical analysis was performed at the tumor level.

Results: Eighty-five patients (median age, 62 years; 55 women) with 95 tumors were included. None of the subjectively evaluated imaging characteristics were associated with pathologic response (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for RECIST categorical response assessment (K = 0.70) and moderate for CT morphological group response (K = 0.50). In the validation cohort, the machine learning model built with radiomic features obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 and outperformed subjective RECIST assessment (AUC = 0.53, p = 0.01) and morphologic assessment (AUC = 0.56, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Radiologist assessment of oligometastatic CRLM after neoadjuvant therapy using RECIST 1.1 and CT morphologic criteria was not associated with pathologic response. In contrast, a machine-learning model based on radiomic features extracted from tumoral and peritumoral regions had high diagnostic performance in assessing responders versus nonresponders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The Top Ten Annals of Surgical Oncology Original Articles on Twitter/X: 2020-2023. Correction: ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Three-Dimensional (3D) Reconstruction and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence: The Perfect Combo to Enter the Era of Intraoperative Liver Navigation. Correction: Patient-Reported Outcomes 10 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Evaluating the Efficacy of Different Treatment Intensities in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Nationwide Cancer Registry-Based Study. ASO Visual Abstract: Cost-Analysis of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Advanced Pelvic Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1