临床试验中康复服务组织报告的拟议类别:讨论文件。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6
Cecilie Røe, Christoph Gutenbrunner, Andrea Bökel, Marit Kirkevold, Boya Nugraha, Nada Andelic, Juan Lu, Erik Bautz-Holter, Paul B Perrin, Audny Anke, Reidun Jahnsen, Grethe Månum, Emilie Howe, Line Kildal Bragstad, Helene L Soberg
{"title":"临床试验中康复服务组织报告的拟议类别:讨论文件。","authors":"Cecilie Røe, Christoph Gutenbrunner, Andrea Bökel, Marit Kirkevold, Boya Nugraha, Nada Andelic, Juan Lu, Erik Bautz-Holter, Paul B Perrin, Audny Anke, Reidun Jahnsen, Grethe Månum, Emilie Howe, Line Kildal Bragstad, Helene L Soberg","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposed categories for reporting of service organization in rehabilitation in clinical trials: a discussion paper.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilie Røe, Christoph Gutenbrunner, Andrea Bökel, Marit Kirkevold, Boya Nugraha, Nada Andelic, Juan Lu, Erik Bautz-Holter, Paul B Perrin, Audny Anke, Reidun Jahnsen, Grethe Månum, Emilie Howe, Line Kildal Bragstad, Helene L Soberg\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:根据《国际康复服务组织分类》(ICSO-R 2.0)中的分类,我们旨在制定专门针对临床试验中组织因素的报告标准:方法:分两步进行。第一步,确定重要类别。确定的依据是之前由国际利益相关者参与的德尔菲调查的结果、两篇系统文献综述以及德国、印度尼西亚和挪威用户焦点小组的结果。第二步是对类别进行必要的缩减,并通过主要研究人员、利益相关方和用户之间的两轮投票,提出报告规范:结果:建议的最低报告要求包括 "背景和环境 "以及 "质量保证和管理"。背景和环境建议包括干预是否由医院、社区或其他服务提供者提供。提供服务的方式建议明确为住院、门诊、居家或远程康复。此外,还应报告专业水平(初级/中级)和服务提供阶段(急性、亚急性或长期康复服务)。质量保证和管理应报告为是或否,选项 "是 "要求在方法部分描述所采用的质量保证:本研究建议对临床试验中的组织因素进行强制性和标准化报告,以促进产生有关康复医学中有效服务提供和交付的科学证据。我们鼓励作者考虑对建议的报告集进行测试、批评和修改,以提高其适用性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proposed categories for reporting of service organization in rehabilitation in clinical trials: a discussion paper.

Background: The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses.

Aim: Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials.

Methods: A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users.

Results: The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section.

Conclusions: This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1