欧洲磁共振安全状况。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Insights into Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1186/s13244-024-01813-6
{"title":"欧洲磁共振安全状况。","authors":"","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01813-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the absence of ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance (MR) has inherent risks in clinical practice that can have serious health consequences if overlooked. At an international level, there are MR safety guidelines that help define the organization of a radiology department to minimize the risks for patients and personnel. However, competing guidelines exist and not every country and institution adheres to the same standards. In this work, we aim to understand the current situation regarding MR safety practices across Europe, and to identify the points where harmonization, coordination, or further education is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey questionnaire was distributed between April and June 2023 through ESR member societies to healthcare professionals, aimed to assess personnel training, local policies, scanning practices, and accidents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and ninety-three responses were obtained from 44 different countries. The majority of respondents from five countries reported that MR safety is mandated by law, but we could only confirm two (Italy and Austria). While 77% of the responses said that their institution had a clear MR safety guideline, 52% said that nobody in their institution had received specific MR safety training. MR-conditional cardiac devices are mostly scanned in university hospitals (reported by 75% of respondents from this type of institution) but in only 42% of outpatient facilities. MR-unsafe cardiac devices are only scanned off-label in 27% of university hospitals, and in an even smaller share of other institutions. Approximately 12% of the respondents reported MR-related accidents resulting in patient or personnel injury. Overall, there is the sentiment that MR safety education and regulation are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The European landscape in terms of MR safety is very heterogeneous, with different regulations across countries, and different procedures for MR safety training and their application in clinical routine. The European Society of Radiology is optimally positioned to play an active role in the harmonization of MR safety education and practices across Europe, and we are proposing a four-tiered framework for the development of a teaching curriculum for MR safety training.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>There is room for raising awareness of MR safety issues to ensure patient safety, reduce accidents, and benefit more patients. We advocate for radiologist-led standardization and improvement of MR safety training as a way to address this problem.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Our survey of MR safety practices across Europe revealed significant heterogeneity in regulations, training, and scanning practices. There is a widespread lack of awareness and implementation of MR safety guidelines and diffuse uncertainty, under-scanning of eligible patients, and preventable accidents. The ESR proposes a harmonized, four-tiered MR safety training curriculum to standardize, and improve safety practices across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European MR safety landscape.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-024-01813-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the absence of ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance (MR) has inherent risks in clinical practice that can have serious health consequences if overlooked. At an international level, there are MR safety guidelines that help define the organization of a radiology department to minimize the risks for patients and personnel. However, competing guidelines exist and not every country and institution adheres to the same standards. In this work, we aim to understand the current situation regarding MR safety practices across Europe, and to identify the points where harmonization, coordination, or further education is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey questionnaire was distributed between April and June 2023 through ESR member societies to healthcare professionals, aimed to assess personnel training, local policies, scanning practices, and accidents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and ninety-three responses were obtained from 44 different countries. The majority of respondents from five countries reported that MR safety is mandated by law, but we could only confirm two (Italy and Austria). While 77% of the responses said that their institution had a clear MR safety guideline, 52% said that nobody in their institution had received specific MR safety training. MR-conditional cardiac devices are mostly scanned in university hospitals (reported by 75% of respondents from this type of institution) but in only 42% of outpatient facilities. MR-unsafe cardiac devices are only scanned off-label in 27% of university hospitals, and in an even smaller share of other institutions. Approximately 12% of the respondents reported MR-related accidents resulting in patient or personnel injury. Overall, there is the sentiment that MR safety education and regulation are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The European landscape in terms of MR safety is very heterogeneous, with different regulations across countries, and different procedures for MR safety training and their application in clinical routine. The European Society of Radiology is optimally positioned to play an active role in the harmonization of MR safety education and practices across Europe, and we are proposing a four-tiered framework for the development of a teaching curriculum for MR safety training.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>There is room for raising awareness of MR safety issues to ensure patient safety, reduce accidents, and benefit more patients. We advocate for radiologist-led standardization and improvement of MR safety training as a way to address this problem.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Our survey of MR safety practices across Europe revealed significant heterogeneity in regulations, training, and scanning practices. There is a widespread lack of awareness and implementation of MR safety guidelines and diffuse uncertainty, under-scanning of eligible patients, and preventable accidents. The ESR proposes a harmonized, four-tiered MR safety training curriculum to standardize, and improve safety practices across Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01813-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01813-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管没有电离辐射,磁共振(MR)在临床实践中仍存在固有风险,如果忽视这些风险,可能会对健康造成严重后果。国际上有磁共振安全指南帮助确定放射科的组织结构,以最大限度地降低对患者和工作人员的风险。然而,目前存在相互竞争的指南,并非每个国家和机构都遵守相同的标准。在这项工作中,我们旨在了解欧洲各国核磁共振安全实践的现状,并找出需要统一、协调或进一步教育的地方:方法:2023 年 4 月至 6 月期间,我们通过 ESR 成员协会向医护人员发放了一份匿名调查问卷,旨在评估人员培训、地方政策、扫描实践和事故情况:结果:共收到来自 44 个不同国家的 793 份回复。来自五个国家的大多数受访者表示,磁共振成像安全是法律规定的,但我们只能确认两个国家(意大利和奥地利)。虽然 77% 的受访者表示其所在机构有明确的磁共振安全指南,但 52% 的受访者表示其所在机构没有人接受过专门的磁共振安全培训。符合磁共振条件的心脏设备大多在大学医院进行扫描(75% 的受访者来自此类医院),但只有 42% 的门诊机构进行了扫描。只有 27% 的大学医院在标签外扫描磁共振不安全心脏设备,其他机构的比例甚至更低。约 12% 的受访者报告了导致患者或人员受伤的磁共振相关事故。总体而言,人们认为需要开展核磁共振安全教育并制定相关法规:欧洲在核磁共振安全方面的情况非常复杂,各国的法规不同,核磁共振安全培训及其在临床常规中的应用程序也不同。欧洲放射学会在协调整个欧洲的磁共振成像安全教育和实践方面发挥着积极的作用,因此我们提出了一个四级框架,用于开发磁共振成像安全培训的教学课程:提高对磁共振安全问题的认识仍有空间,以确保患者安全、减少事故并使更多患者受益。我们主张由放射科医生主导核磁共振安全培训的标准化和改进,以此来解决这一问题:我们对欧洲各国磁共振安全实践的调查显示,在法规、培训和扫描实践方面存在很大差异。人们普遍缺乏对磁共振成像安全指南的认识和执行,不确定性普遍存在,对符合条件的患者扫描不足,并发生了可预防的事故。欧洲磁共振研究中心提出了一个统一的四级磁共振安全培训课程,以规范和改善整个欧洲的安全实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The European MR safety landscape.

Objectives: Despite the absence of ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance (MR) has inherent risks in clinical practice that can have serious health consequences if overlooked. At an international level, there are MR safety guidelines that help define the organization of a radiology department to minimize the risks for patients and personnel. However, competing guidelines exist and not every country and institution adheres to the same standards. In this work, we aim to understand the current situation regarding MR safety practices across Europe, and to identify the points where harmonization, coordination, or further education is needed.

Methods: An anonymous survey questionnaire was distributed between April and June 2023 through ESR member societies to healthcare professionals, aimed to assess personnel training, local policies, scanning practices, and accidents.

Results: Seven hundred and ninety-three responses were obtained from 44 different countries. The majority of respondents from five countries reported that MR safety is mandated by law, but we could only confirm two (Italy and Austria). While 77% of the responses said that their institution had a clear MR safety guideline, 52% said that nobody in their institution had received specific MR safety training. MR-conditional cardiac devices are mostly scanned in university hospitals (reported by 75% of respondents from this type of institution) but in only 42% of outpatient facilities. MR-unsafe cardiac devices are only scanned off-label in 27% of university hospitals, and in an even smaller share of other institutions. Approximately 12% of the respondents reported MR-related accidents resulting in patient or personnel injury. Overall, there is the sentiment that MR safety education and regulation are needed.

Conclusions: The European landscape in terms of MR safety is very heterogeneous, with different regulations across countries, and different procedures for MR safety training and their application in clinical routine. The European Society of Radiology is optimally positioned to play an active role in the harmonization of MR safety education and practices across Europe, and we are proposing a four-tiered framework for the development of a teaching curriculum for MR safety training.

Critical relevance statement: There is room for raising awareness of MR safety issues to ensure patient safety, reduce accidents, and benefit more patients. We advocate for radiologist-led standardization and improvement of MR safety training as a way to address this problem.

Key points: Our survey of MR safety practices across Europe revealed significant heterogeneity in regulations, training, and scanning practices. There is a widespread lack of awareness and implementation of MR safety guidelines and diffuse uncertainty, under-scanning of eligible patients, and preventable accidents. The ESR proposes a harmonized, four-tiered MR safety training curriculum to standardize, and improve safety practices across Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous cryoablation in soft tissue tumor management: an educational review. Computed tomography enterography-based deep learning radiomics to predict stratified healing in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicenter study. Constructing and exploring neuroimaging projects: a survey from clinical practice to scientific research. Estimated diagnostic performance of prostate MRI performed with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. Multimodality deep learning radiomics predicts pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1