Anand Seethepalli, Chanae Ottley, Joanne Childs, Kevin R Cope, Aubrey K Fine, John H Lagergren, Udaya Kalluri, Colleen M Iversen, Larry M York
{"title":"分而治之:使用 RhizoVision Explorer,利用图像连接和统计方法汇总来自多个根扫描的数据。","authors":"Anand Seethepalli, Chanae Ottley, Joanne Childs, Kevin R Cope, Aubrey K Fine, John H Lagergren, Udaya Kalluri, Colleen M Iversen, Larry M York","doi":"10.1111/nph.20151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Roots are important in agricultural and natural systems for determining plant productivity and soil carbon inputs. Sometimes, the amount of roots in a sample is too much to fit into a single scanned image, so the sample is divided among several scans, and there is no standard method to aggregate the data. Here, we describe and validate two methods for standardizing measurements across multiple scans: image concatenation and statistical aggregation. We developed a Python script that identifies which images belong to the same sample and returns a single, larger concatenated image. These concatenated images and the original images were processed with RhizoVision Explorer, a free and open-source software. An R script was developed, which identifies rows of data belonging to the same sample and applies correct statistical methods to return a single data row for each sample. These two methods were compared using example images from switchgrass, poplar, and various tree and ericaceous shrub species from a northern peatland and the Arctic. Most root measurements were nearly identical between the two methods except median diameter, which cannot be accurately computed by statistical aggregation. We believe the availability of these methods will be useful to the root biology community.</p>","PeriodicalId":48887,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":" ","pages":"2101-2108"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divide and conquer: using RhizoVision Explorer to aggregate data from multiple root scans using image concatenation and statistical methods.\",\"authors\":\"Anand Seethepalli, Chanae Ottley, Joanne Childs, Kevin R Cope, Aubrey K Fine, John H Lagergren, Udaya Kalluri, Colleen M Iversen, Larry M York\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.20151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Roots are important in agricultural and natural systems for determining plant productivity and soil carbon inputs. Sometimes, the amount of roots in a sample is too much to fit into a single scanned image, so the sample is divided among several scans, and there is no standard method to aggregate the data. Here, we describe and validate two methods for standardizing measurements across multiple scans: image concatenation and statistical aggregation. We developed a Python script that identifies which images belong to the same sample and returns a single, larger concatenated image. These concatenated images and the original images were processed with RhizoVision Explorer, a free and open-source software. An R script was developed, which identifies rows of data belonging to the same sample and applies correct statistical methods to return a single data row for each sample. These two methods were compared using example images from switchgrass, poplar, and various tree and ericaceous shrub species from a northern peatland and the Arctic. Most root measurements were nearly identical between the two methods except median diameter, which cannot be accurately computed by statistical aggregation. We believe the availability of these methods will be useful to the root biology community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2101-2108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20151\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在农业和自然系统中,根对确定植物生产力和土壤碳输入量非常重要。有时,一个样本中的根的数量太多,无法容纳在一张扫描图像中,因此样本要分几次扫描,而目前还没有汇总数据的标准方法。在此,我们介绍并验证了两种在多个扫描中进行标准化测量的方法:图像连接和统计汇总。我们开发了一个 Python 脚本,可以识别哪些图像属于同一个样本,并返回一个更大的合并图像。我们使用免费开源软件 RhizoVision Explorer 处理这些合并图像和原始图像。开发的 R 脚本可识别属于同一样本的数据行,并应用正确的统计方法返回每个样本的单一数据行。我们使用来自北方泥炭地和北极地区的开关草、杨树以及各种乔木和栎类灌木物种的示例图像对这两种方法进行了比较。除了中位直径无法通过统计汇总准确计算外,这两种方法的大多数根部测量结果几乎相同。我们相信这些方法的可用性将对根生物学界有所帮助。
Divide and conquer: using RhizoVision Explorer to aggregate data from multiple root scans using image concatenation and statistical methods.
Roots are important in agricultural and natural systems for determining plant productivity and soil carbon inputs. Sometimes, the amount of roots in a sample is too much to fit into a single scanned image, so the sample is divided among several scans, and there is no standard method to aggregate the data. Here, we describe and validate two methods for standardizing measurements across multiple scans: image concatenation and statistical aggregation. We developed a Python script that identifies which images belong to the same sample and returns a single, larger concatenated image. These concatenated images and the original images were processed with RhizoVision Explorer, a free and open-source software. An R script was developed, which identifies rows of data belonging to the same sample and applies correct statistical methods to return a single data row for each sample. These two methods were compared using example images from switchgrass, poplar, and various tree and ericaceous shrub species from a northern peatland and the Arctic. Most root measurements were nearly identical between the two methods except median diameter, which cannot be accurately computed by statistical aggregation. We believe the availability of these methods will be useful to the root biology community.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is a leading publication that showcases exceptional and groundbreaking research in plant science and its practical applications. With a focus on five distinct sections - Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology - the journal covers a wide array of topics ranging from cellular processes to the impact of global environmental changes. We encourage the use of interdisciplinary approaches, and our content is structured to reflect this. Our journal acknowledges the diverse techniques employed in plant science, including molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches, across various subfields.