L-H. Wu , J-L. Wang , Y-H. Liu , C-C. Su , Y-H.K. Yang , S-J. Lin , C-L. Cheng
{"title":"与服用组胺-2 受体拮抗剂的患者相比,服用质子泵抑制剂预防应激性溃疡的住院患者感染艰难梭菌的风险更高。","authors":"L-H. Wu , J-L. Wang , Y-H. Liu , C-C. Su , Y-H.K. Yang , S-J. Lin , C-L. Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous studies on <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infection (CDI) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users generally enrolled a heterogeneous population and did not include a control group of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) users or adjust for confounding variables, such as previous antibiotics. It is uncertain whether hospitalized patients using PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) are at a higher risk of CDI compared with those using H2RAs. This study aimed to compare the association between CDI and the usage of antisecretory drugs (ASDs): PPIs and H2RAs, for SUP among hospitalized patients, and the impact of the duration of their use on CDI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this nationwide population-based cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database, hospitalized patients using ASDs for SUP were identified between 2017 and 2018. A total of 63,266 and 69,269 individuals were included in the PPI and H2RA groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was a 90-day monitoring of CDI occurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The incidences of CDI were 1.6/10,000 and 0.5/10,000 person-days in the PPIs and H2RAs groups, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of infection in the PPIs group remained significantly higher than in the H2RAs group (hazard ratio (HR), 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63–3.81). In the subgroup analysis, during hospitalization, the risk of CDI for patients using high-risk antibiotics or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as patients with immunodeficiency, using PPIs for SUP, was higher than using H2RAs. Furthermore, the risk of CDI was higher in patients using ASDs for durations >14 days than in those using them for <7 days (adjusted HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.34–5.75).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The risk of occurrence CDI for hospitalized patients using PPIs for SUP was higher than using H2RAs. It is recommended not to exceed 14 days of any gastric ASDs for SUP during hospitalization, especially for patients who have used high-risk antibiotics, have been admitted to the ICU, or have immunodeficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"154 ","pages":"Pages 9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospitalized patients on proton pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis have a higher risk of Clostridioides difficile infection compared with those on histamine-2 receptor antagonists\",\"authors\":\"L-H. Wu , J-L. Wang , Y-H. Liu , C-C. Su , Y-H.K. Yang , S-J. Lin , C-L. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous studies on <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infection (CDI) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users generally enrolled a heterogeneous population and did not include a control group of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) users or adjust for confounding variables, such as previous antibiotics. It is uncertain whether hospitalized patients using PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) are at a higher risk of CDI compared with those using H2RAs. This study aimed to compare the association between CDI and the usage of antisecretory drugs (ASDs): PPIs and H2RAs, for SUP among hospitalized patients, and the impact of the duration of their use on CDI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this nationwide population-based cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database, hospitalized patients using ASDs for SUP were identified between 2017 and 2018. A total of 63,266 and 69,269 individuals were included in the PPI and H2RA groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was a 90-day monitoring of CDI occurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The incidences of CDI were 1.6/10,000 and 0.5/10,000 person-days in the PPIs and H2RAs groups, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of infection in the PPIs group remained significantly higher than in the H2RAs group (hazard ratio (HR), 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63–3.81). In the subgroup analysis, during hospitalization, the risk of CDI for patients using high-risk antibiotics or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as patients with immunodeficiency, using PPIs for SUP, was higher than using H2RAs. Furthermore, the risk of CDI was higher in patients using ASDs for durations >14 days than in those using them for <7 days (adjusted HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.34–5.75).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The risk of occurrence CDI for hospitalized patients using PPIs for SUP was higher than using H2RAs. It is recommended not to exceed 14 days of any gastric ASDs for SUP during hospitalization, especially for patients who have used high-risk antibiotics, have been admitted to the ICU, or have immunodeficiency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124003244\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124003244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hospitalized patients on proton pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis have a higher risk of Clostridioides difficile infection compared with those on histamine-2 receptor antagonists
Background
Previous studies on Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users generally enrolled a heterogeneous population and did not include a control group of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) users or adjust for confounding variables, such as previous antibiotics. It is uncertain whether hospitalized patients using PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) are at a higher risk of CDI compared with those using H2RAs. This study aimed to compare the association between CDI and the usage of antisecretory drugs (ASDs): PPIs and H2RAs, for SUP among hospitalized patients, and the impact of the duration of their use on CDI.
Methods
In this nationwide population-based cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database, hospitalized patients using ASDs for SUP were identified between 2017 and 2018. A total of 63,266 and 69,269 individuals were included in the PPI and H2RA groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was a 90-day monitoring of CDI occurrence.
Findings
The incidences of CDI were 1.6/10,000 and 0.5/10,000 person-days in the PPIs and H2RAs groups, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of infection in the PPIs group remained significantly higher than in the H2RAs group (hazard ratio (HR), 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63–3.81). In the subgroup analysis, during hospitalization, the risk of CDI for patients using high-risk antibiotics or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as patients with immunodeficiency, using PPIs for SUP, was higher than using H2RAs. Furthermore, the risk of CDI was higher in patients using ASDs for durations >14 days than in those using them for <7 days (adjusted HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.34–5.75).
Conclusions
The risk of occurrence CDI for hospitalized patients using PPIs for SUP was higher than using H2RAs. It is recommended not to exceed 14 days of any gastric ASDs for SUP during hospitalization, especially for patients who have used high-risk antibiotics, have been admitted to the ICU, or have immunodeficiency.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.