中国西南地区不同杜鹃林群落最小数据集和定量土壤质量指数的选择

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant and Soil Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0
Yang Cao, Wenting Zhang, Bojuan Pan, Lihua Dai, Ao Tian
{"title":"中国西南地区不同杜鹃林群落最小数据集和定量土壤质量指数的选择","authors":"Yang Cao, Wenting Zhang, Bojuan Pan, Lihua Dai, Ao Tian","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Soil quality assessment is crucial for achieving sustainable soil management and maintaining ecosystem health. However, there is limited research on soil quality assessments in azalea forests.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this study, we selected 17 soil physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS) and utilised principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the minimum data set (MDS). Linear/nonlinear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods were employed to calculate four soil quality indices (SQIs) to determine the SQIs of azalea forest communities (RD, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i>; RI, <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>; RM, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The capillary porosity, total nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and soil carbon density were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs showed consistent performance and exhibited significant positive correlations with each other (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>n</i> &gt; 15). Nonlinear weighted additive integration (SQI<sub>NL-W</sub>) yielded the highest discriminative effectiveness for the SQI among the azalea forest communities (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.848). The SQI of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> forest was the highest, followed by that of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest of both species, and both forest community types exhibited significantly greater SQIs than did the <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results demonstrate that the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> has higher soil quality. In addition, the SQI based on the MDS method could be a useful tool to indicate the soil quality of azalea forest communities, and SQI<sub>NL-W</sub> can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for SQI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indices for different azalea forest communities in southwestern China\",\"authors\":\"Yang Cao, Wenting Zhang, Bojuan Pan, Lihua Dai, Ao Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Soil quality assessment is crucial for achieving sustainable soil management and maintaining ecosystem health. However, there is limited research on soil quality assessments in azalea forests.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In this study, we selected 17 soil physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS) and utilised principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the minimum data set (MDS). Linear/nonlinear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods were employed to calculate four soil quality indices (SQIs) to determine the SQIs of azalea forest communities (RD, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i>; RI, <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>; RM, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The capillary porosity, total nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and soil carbon density were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs showed consistent performance and exhibited significant positive correlations with each other (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>n</i> &gt; 15). Nonlinear weighted additive integration (SQI<sub>NL-W</sub>) yielded the highest discriminative effectiveness for the SQI among the azalea forest communities (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.848). The SQI of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> forest was the highest, followed by that of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest of both species, and both forest community types exhibited significantly greater SQIs than did the <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results demonstrate that the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> has higher soil quality. In addition, the SQI based on the MDS method could be a useful tool to indicate the soil quality of azalea forest communities, and SQI<sub>NL-W</sub> can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for SQI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的土壤质量评估对于实现可持续土壤管理和维护生态系统健康至关重要。方法在本研究中,我们选取了 17 个土壤理化指标作为总数据集(TDS),并利用主成分分析法(PCA)构建最小数据集(MDS)。结果毛管孔隙度、全氮、碳氮比和土壤碳密度被确定为 MDS。四种 SQIs 的表现一致,且相互之间具有显著的正相关性(P < 0.001,n >15)。在杜鹃林群落中,非线性加权加法积分(SQINL-W)产生的 SQI 识别效果最高(R2 = 0.848)。Rhododendron delavayi 森林的 SQI 最高,其次是两种杜鹃花的 Rhododendron delavayi × Rhododendron irroratum 森林,两种森林群落类型的 SQI 都明显高于 Rhododendron irroratum 森林。此外,基于 MDS 方法的 SQI 可以作为表示杜鹃花森林群落土壤质量的有用工具,而 SQINL-W 可以为 SQI 提供更好的实用定量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selection of the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indices for different azalea forest communities in southwestern China

Background and aims

Soil quality assessment is crucial for achieving sustainable soil management and maintaining ecosystem health. However, there is limited research on soil quality assessments in azalea forests.

Methods

In this study, we selected 17 soil physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS) and utilised principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the minimum data set (MDS). Linear/nonlinear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods were employed to calculate four soil quality indices (SQIs) to determine the SQIs of azalea forest communities (RD, Rhododendron delavayi; RI, Rhododendron irroratum; RM, Rhododendron delavayi × Rhododendron irroratum).

Results

The capillary porosity, total nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and soil carbon density were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs showed consistent performance and exhibited significant positive correlations with each other (P < 0.001, n > 15). Nonlinear weighted additive integration (SQINL-W) yielded the highest discriminative effectiveness for the SQI among the azalea forest communities (R2 = 0.848). The SQI of the Rhododendron delavayi forest was the highest, followed by that of the Rhododendron delavayi × Rhododendron irroratum forest of both species, and both forest community types exhibited significantly greater SQIs than did the Rhododendron irroratum forest.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the Rhododendron delavayi has higher soil quality. In addition, the SQI based on the MDS method could be a useful tool to indicate the soil quality of azalea forest communities, and SQINL-W can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for SQI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
期刊最新文献
Microbial inoculant-induced modifications of rhizospheric metabolites and microbial communities enhance plant growth Enterobacter hormaechei Wu15-loaded biochar enhances the ice plant growth by improving saline soil quality Responses of forest soil respiration in the East Asian monsoon region to ENSO events Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on Se accumulation and associated rhizobacterial community in Cardamine hupingshanensis The effect of ecological restoration on mutualistic services provided by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depends on site location and host identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1