Yang Cao, Wenting Zhang, Bojuan Pan, Lihua Dai, Ao Tian
{"title":"中国西南地区不同杜鹃林群落最小数据集和定量土壤质量指数的选择","authors":"Yang Cao, Wenting Zhang, Bojuan Pan, Lihua Dai, Ao Tian","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Soil quality assessment is crucial for achieving sustainable soil management and maintaining ecosystem health. However, there is limited research on soil quality assessments in azalea forests.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this study, we selected 17 soil physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS) and utilised principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the minimum data set (MDS). Linear/nonlinear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods were employed to calculate four soil quality indices (SQIs) to determine the SQIs of azalea forest communities (RD, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i>; RI, <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>; RM, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The capillary porosity, total nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and soil carbon density were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs showed consistent performance and exhibited significant positive correlations with each other (<i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>n</i> > 15). Nonlinear weighted additive integration (SQI<sub>NL-W</sub>) yielded the highest discriminative effectiveness for the SQI among the azalea forest communities (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.848). The SQI of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> forest was the highest, followed by that of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest of both species, and both forest community types exhibited significantly greater SQIs than did the <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results demonstrate that the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> has higher soil quality. In addition, the SQI based on the MDS method could be a useful tool to indicate the soil quality of azalea forest communities, and SQI<sub>NL-W</sub> can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for SQI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indices for different azalea forest communities in southwestern China\",\"authors\":\"Yang Cao, Wenting Zhang, Bojuan Pan, Lihua Dai, Ao Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Soil quality assessment is crucial for achieving sustainable soil management and maintaining ecosystem health. However, there is limited research on soil quality assessments in azalea forests.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>In this study, we selected 17 soil physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS) and utilised principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the minimum data set (MDS). Linear/nonlinear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods were employed to calculate four soil quality indices (SQIs) to determine the SQIs of azalea forest communities (RD, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i>; RI, <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>; RM, <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i>).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The capillary porosity, total nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and soil carbon density were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs showed consistent performance and exhibited significant positive correlations with each other (<i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>n</i> > 15). Nonlinear weighted additive integration (SQI<sub>NL-W</sub>) yielded the highest discriminative effectiveness for the SQI among the azalea forest communities (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.848). The SQI of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> forest was the highest, followed by that of the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> × <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest of both species, and both forest community types exhibited significantly greater SQIs than did the <i>Rhododendron irroratum</i> forest.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our results demonstrate that the <i>Rhododendron delavayi</i> has higher soil quality. In addition, the SQI based on the MDS method could be a useful tool to indicate the soil quality of azalea forest communities, and SQI<sub>NL-W</sub> can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for SQI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07002-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Selection of the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indices for different azalea forest communities in southwestern China
Background and aims
Soil quality assessment is crucial for achieving sustainable soil management and maintaining ecosystem health. However, there is limited research on soil quality assessments in azalea forests.
Methods
In this study, we selected 17 soil physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS) and utilised principal component analysis (PCA) to construct the minimum data set (MDS). Linear/nonlinear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods were employed to calculate four soil quality indices (SQIs) to determine the SQIs of azalea forest communities (RD, Rhododendron delavayi; RI, Rhododendron irroratum; RM, Rhododendron delavayi × Rhododendron irroratum).
Results
The capillary porosity, total nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, and soil carbon density were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs showed consistent performance and exhibited significant positive correlations with each other (P < 0.001, n > 15). Nonlinear weighted additive integration (SQINL-W) yielded the highest discriminative effectiveness for the SQI among the azalea forest communities (R2 = 0.848). The SQI of the Rhododendron delavayi forest was the highest, followed by that of the Rhododendron delavayi × Rhododendron irroratum forest of both species, and both forest community types exhibited significantly greater SQIs than did the Rhododendron irroratum forest.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrate that the Rhododendron delavayi has higher soil quality. In addition, the SQI based on the MDS method could be a useful tool to indicate the soil quality of azalea forest communities, and SQINL-W can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for SQI.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.