减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的战略和策略:系统综述

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-081284
Jeffrey Braithwaite, Carolynn L Smith, Elle Leask, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Kalissa Brooke-Cowden, Georgia Fisher, Romika Patel, Lisa Pagano, Hania Rahimi-Ardabili, Samantha Spanos, Christina Rojas, Andrew Partington, Ella McQuillan, Genevieve Dammery, Ann Carrigan, Lauren Ehrenfeld, Enrico Coiera, Johanna Westbrook, Yvonne Zurynski
{"title":"减少医疗保健对气候变化影响的战略和策略:系统综述","authors":"Jeffrey Braithwaite, Carolynn L Smith, Elle Leask, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Kalissa Brooke-Cowden, Georgia Fisher, Romika Patel, Lisa Pagano, Hania Rahimi-Ardabili, Samantha Spanos, Christina Rojas, Andrew Partington, Ella McQuillan, Genevieve Dammery, Ann Carrigan, Lauren Ehrenfeld, Enrico Coiera, Johanna Westbrook, Yvonne Zurynski","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-081284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To review the international literature and assess the ways healthcare systems are mitigating and can mitigate their carbon footprint, which is currently estimated to be more than 4.4% of global emissions. Design Systematic review of empirical studies and grey literature to examine how healthcare services and institutions are limiting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Data sources Eight databases and authoritative reports were searched from inception dates to November 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Teams of investigators screened relevant publications against the inclusion criteria (eg, in English; discussed impact of healthcare systems on climate change), applying four quality appraisal tools, and results are reported in accordance with PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Results Of 33 737 publications identified, 32 998 (97.8%) were excluded after title and abstract screening; 536 (72.5%) of the remaining publications were excluded after full text review. Two additional papers were identified, screened, and included through backward citation tracking. The 205 included studies applied empirical (n=88, 42.9%), review (n=60, 29.3%), narrative descriptive (n=53, 25.9%), and multiple (n=4, 2.0%) methods. More than half of the publications (51.5%) addressed the macro level of the healthcare system. Nine themes were identified using inductive analysis: changing clinical and surgical practices (n=107); enacting policies and governance (n=97); managing physical waste (n=83); changing organisational behaviour (n=76); actions of individuals and groups (eg, advocacy, community involvement; n=74); minimising travel and transportation (n=70); using tools for measuring GHG emissions (n=70); reducing emissions related to infrastructure (n=63); and decarbonising the supply chain (n=48). Conclusions Publications presented various strategies and tactics to reduce GHG emissions. These included changing clinical and surgical practices; using policies such as benchmarking and reporting at a facility level, and financial levers to reduce emissions from procurement; reducing physical waste; changing organisational culture through workforce training; supporting education on the benefits of decarbonisation; and involving patients in care planning. Numerous tools and frameworks were presented for measuring GHG emissions, but implementation and evaluation of the sustainability of initiatives were largely missing. At the macro level, decarbonisation approaches focused on energy grid emissions, infrastructure efficiency, and reducing supply chain emissions, including those from agriculture and supply of food products. Decarbonisation mechanisms at the micro and meso system levels ranged from reducing low value care, to choosing lower GHG options (eg, anaesthetic gases, rescue inhalers), to reducing travel. Based on these strategies and tactics, this study provides a framework to support the decarbonisation of healthcare systems. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42022383719. All datasets generated and analysed for this study, including the search strategy, list of the included and excluded studies, data extracted, analysis plans, and quality assessment are available in the article or supplementary material and upon request from the corresponding author. No individual participant data were used for this study.","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Braithwaite, Carolynn L Smith, Elle Leask, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Kalissa Brooke-Cowden, Georgia Fisher, Romika Patel, Lisa Pagano, Hania Rahimi-Ardabili, Samantha Spanos, Christina Rojas, Andrew Partington, Ella McQuillan, Genevieve Dammery, Ann Carrigan, Lauren Ehrenfeld, Enrico Coiera, Johanna Westbrook, Yvonne Zurynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj-2024-081284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To review the international literature and assess the ways healthcare systems are mitigating and can mitigate their carbon footprint, which is currently estimated to be more than 4.4% of global emissions. Design Systematic review of empirical studies and grey literature to examine how healthcare services and institutions are limiting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Data sources Eight databases and authoritative reports were searched from inception dates to November 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Teams of investigators screened relevant publications against the inclusion criteria (eg, in English; discussed impact of healthcare systems on climate change), applying four quality appraisal tools, and results are reported in accordance with PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Results Of 33 737 publications identified, 32 998 (97.8%) were excluded after title and abstract screening; 536 (72.5%) of the remaining publications were excluded after full text review. Two additional papers were identified, screened, and included through backward citation tracking. The 205 included studies applied empirical (n=88, 42.9%), review (n=60, 29.3%), narrative descriptive (n=53, 25.9%), and multiple (n=4, 2.0%) methods. More than half of the publications (51.5%) addressed the macro level of the healthcare system. Nine themes were identified using inductive analysis: changing clinical and surgical practices (n=107); enacting policies and governance (n=97); managing physical waste (n=83); changing organisational behaviour (n=76); actions of individuals and groups (eg, advocacy, community involvement; n=74); minimising travel and transportation (n=70); using tools for measuring GHG emissions (n=70); reducing emissions related to infrastructure (n=63); and decarbonising the supply chain (n=48). Conclusions Publications presented various strategies and tactics to reduce GHG emissions. These included changing clinical and surgical practices; using policies such as benchmarking and reporting at a facility level, and financial levers to reduce emissions from procurement; reducing physical waste; changing organisational culture through workforce training; supporting education on the benefits of decarbonisation; and involving patients in care planning. Numerous tools and frameworks were presented for measuring GHG emissions, but implementation and evaluation of the sustainability of initiatives were largely missing. At the macro level, decarbonisation approaches focused on energy grid emissions, infrastructure efficiency, and reducing supply chain emissions, including those from agriculture and supply of food products. Decarbonisation mechanisms at the micro and meso system levels ranged from reducing low value care, to choosing lower GHG options (eg, anaesthetic gases, rescue inhalers), to reducing travel. Based on these strategies and tactics, this study provides a framework to support the decarbonisation of healthcare systems. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42022383719. All datasets generated and analysed for this study, including the search strategy, list of the included and excluded studies, data extracted, analysis plans, and quality assessment are available in the article or supplementary material and upon request from the corresponding author. No individual participant data were used for this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 回顾国际文献,评估医疗保健系统正在和能够减轻其碳足迹的方法,目前估计碳足迹占全球排放量的 4.4%以上。设计 对实证研究和灰色文献进行系统综述,研究医疗保健服务和机构如何限制其温室气体(GHG)排放。数据来源 搜索了从开始日期到 2023 年 11 月的八个数据库和权威报告。选择研究的资格标准 调查人员团队根据纳入标准(例如,英语;讨论了医疗保健系统对气候变化的影响)筛选了相关出版物,并应用了四种质量评估工具,结果按照 PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)进行了报告。结果 在确定的 33 737 篇出版物中,32 998 篇(97.8%)在标题和摘要筛选后被排除;其余 536 篇(72.5%)在全文审阅后被排除。通过反向引文追踪,又发现、筛选并收录了两篇论文。纳入的 205 项研究采用了实证方法(88 篇,占 42.9%)、回顾方法(60 篇,占 29.3%)、叙述描述方法(53 篇,占 25.9%)和多种方法(4 篇,占 2.0%)。半数以上的出版物(51.5%)涉及医疗保健系统的宏观层面。通过归纳分析,确定了九个主题:改变临床和手术实践(n=107);制定政策和治理(n=97);管理物理废物(n=83);改变组织行为(n=76);个人和团体的行动(如宣传、社区参与;n=74);尽量减少旅行和运输(n=70);使用测量温室气体排放的工具(n=70);减少与基础设施相关的排放(n=63);供应链去碳化(n=48)。结论 出版物介绍了各种减少温室气体排放的战略和策略。其中包括改变临床和手术实践;利用政策,如设施层面的基准和报告,以及财务杠杆来减少采购中的排放;减少实物浪费;通过劳动力培训改变组织文化;支持有关去碳化益处的教育;以及让患者参与护理规划。会议提出了许多衡量温室气体排放的工具和框架,但大多缺乏对措施可持续性的实施和评估。在宏观层面,去碳化方法侧重于能源网排放、基础设施效率和减少供应链排放,包括来自农业和食品供应的排放。微观和中观系统层面的脱碳机制包括减少低价值护理、选择温室气体排放量较低的方案(如麻醉气体、抢救性吸入器)以及减少旅行。基于这些战略和策略,本研究提供了一个支持医疗保健系统去碳化的框架。系统综述注册PROSPERO:CRD42022383719。本研究中生成和分析的所有数据集,包括搜索策略、纳入和排除的研究列表、提取的数据、分析计划和质量评估,均可在文章或补充材料中获取,也可向通讯作者索取。本研究未使用参与者的个人数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review
Objective To review the international literature and assess the ways healthcare systems are mitigating and can mitigate their carbon footprint, which is currently estimated to be more than 4.4% of global emissions. Design Systematic review of empirical studies and grey literature to examine how healthcare services and institutions are limiting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Data sources Eight databases and authoritative reports were searched from inception dates to November 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Teams of investigators screened relevant publications against the inclusion criteria (eg, in English; discussed impact of healthcare systems on climate change), applying four quality appraisal tools, and results are reported in accordance with PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Results Of 33 737 publications identified, 32 998 (97.8%) were excluded after title and abstract screening; 536 (72.5%) of the remaining publications were excluded after full text review. Two additional papers were identified, screened, and included through backward citation tracking. The 205 included studies applied empirical (n=88, 42.9%), review (n=60, 29.3%), narrative descriptive (n=53, 25.9%), and multiple (n=4, 2.0%) methods. More than half of the publications (51.5%) addressed the macro level of the healthcare system. Nine themes were identified using inductive analysis: changing clinical and surgical practices (n=107); enacting policies and governance (n=97); managing physical waste (n=83); changing organisational behaviour (n=76); actions of individuals and groups (eg, advocacy, community involvement; n=74); minimising travel and transportation (n=70); using tools for measuring GHG emissions (n=70); reducing emissions related to infrastructure (n=63); and decarbonising the supply chain (n=48). Conclusions Publications presented various strategies and tactics to reduce GHG emissions. These included changing clinical and surgical practices; using policies such as benchmarking and reporting at a facility level, and financial levers to reduce emissions from procurement; reducing physical waste; changing organisational culture through workforce training; supporting education on the benefits of decarbonisation; and involving patients in care planning. Numerous tools and frameworks were presented for measuring GHG emissions, but implementation and evaluation of the sustainability of initiatives were largely missing. At the macro level, decarbonisation approaches focused on energy grid emissions, infrastructure efficiency, and reducing supply chain emissions, including those from agriculture and supply of food products. Decarbonisation mechanisms at the micro and meso system levels ranged from reducing low value care, to choosing lower GHG options (eg, anaesthetic gases, rescue inhalers), to reducing travel. Based on these strategies and tactics, this study provides a framework to support the decarbonisation of healthcare systems. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42022383719. All datasets generated and analysed for this study, including the search strategy, list of the included and excluded studies, data extracted, analysis plans, and quality assessment are available in the article or supplementary material and upon request from the corresponding author. No individual participant data were used for this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Michael Hale Russell Wood Ballantyne Navigating surgery with ADHD and autism Training health leaders to strengthen our response to the climate crisis Strategies and tactics to reduce the impact of healthcare on climate change: systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1