使用抗体法或液相色谱-质谱法/质谱法量化过敏原蛋白质:食物基质、提取和样品制备的影响综述。

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.70029
Wei Hu, Xing Zhang, Yunpeng Shen, Xuanyi Meng, Yong Wu, Ping Tong, Xin Li, Hongbing Chen, Jinyan Gao
{"title":"使用抗体法或液相色谱-质谱法/质谱法量化过敏原蛋白质:食物基质、提取和样品制备的影响综述。","authors":"Wei Hu,&nbsp;Xing Zhang,&nbsp;Yunpeng Shen,&nbsp;Xuanyi Meng,&nbsp;Yong Wu,&nbsp;Ping Tong,&nbsp;Xin Li,&nbsp;Hongbing Chen,&nbsp;Jinyan Gao","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate quantification of allergens in food is crucial for ensuring consumer safety. Pretreatment steps directly affect accuracy and efficiency of allergen quantification. We systematically reviewed the latest advances in pretreatment steps for antibody-based methods and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) protein quantification methods in food. For antibody-based methods, the effects induced by food matrix like decreased allergen solubility, epitope masking, and nonspecific binding are of the upmost importance. To mitigate interference from the matrix, effective and proper extraction can be used to obtain the target allergens with a high protein concentration and necessary epitope exposure. Removal of interfering substances, extraction systems (buffers and additives), assistive technologies, and commercial kits were discussed. About LC–MS/MS quantification, the preparation of the target peptides is the crucial step that significantly affects the efficiency and results obtained from the MS detector. The advantages and limitations of each method for pre-purification, enzymatic digestion, and peptide desalting were compared. Additionally, the application characteristics of microfluidic-based pretreatment devices were illustrated to improve the convenience and efficiency of quantification. A promising research direction is the targeted development of pretreatment methods for complex food matrices, such as lipid-based and carbohydrate-based matrices.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying allergenic proteins using antibody-based methods or liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry: A review about the influence of food matrix, extraction, and sample preparation\",\"authors\":\"Wei Hu,&nbsp;Xing Zhang,&nbsp;Yunpeng Shen,&nbsp;Xuanyi Meng,&nbsp;Yong Wu,&nbsp;Ping Tong,&nbsp;Xin Li,&nbsp;Hongbing Chen,&nbsp;Jinyan Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4337.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate quantification of allergens in food is crucial for ensuring consumer safety. Pretreatment steps directly affect accuracy and efficiency of allergen quantification. We systematically reviewed the latest advances in pretreatment steps for antibody-based methods and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) protein quantification methods in food. For antibody-based methods, the effects induced by food matrix like decreased allergen solubility, epitope masking, and nonspecific binding are of the upmost importance. To mitigate interference from the matrix, effective and proper extraction can be used to obtain the target allergens with a high protein concentration and necessary epitope exposure. Removal of interfering substances, extraction systems (buffers and additives), assistive technologies, and commercial kits were discussed. About LC–MS/MS quantification, the preparation of the target peptides is the crucial step that significantly affects the efficiency and results obtained from the MS detector. The advantages and limitations of each method for pre-purification, enzymatic digestion, and peptide desalting were compared. Additionally, the application characteristics of microfluidic-based pretreatment devices were illustrated to improve the convenience and efficiency of quantification. A promising research direction is the targeted development of pretreatment methods for complex food matrices, such as lipid-based and carbohydrate-based matrices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确量化食品中的过敏原对于确保消费者安全至关重要。前处理步骤直接影响过敏原定量的准确性和效率。我们系统地回顾了基于抗体的方法和液相色谱-质谱/质谱(LC-MS/MS)蛋白质定量方法的前处理步骤的最新进展。对于基于抗体的方法来说,食品基质所引起的影响,如过敏原溶解度降低、表位掩蔽和非特异性结合等,是最重要的。为减轻基质的干扰,可采用有效、适当的提取方法,以获得高蛋白浓度和必要表位暴露的目标过敏原。会议讨论了干扰物质的去除、提取系统(缓冲液和添加剂)、辅助技术和商业试剂盒。关于 LC-MS/MS 定量,目标肽的制备是关键步骤,会对 MS 检测器的效率和结果产生重大影响。比较了预纯化、酶解和肽脱盐等每种方法的优势和局限性。此外,还说明了基于微流控的预处理装置的应用特点,以提高定量的便利性和效率。针对复杂食品基质(如脂质基质和碳水化合物基质)开发预处理方法是一个很有前景的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying allergenic proteins using antibody-based methods or liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry: A review about the influence of food matrix, extraction, and sample preparation

Accurate quantification of allergens in food is crucial for ensuring consumer safety. Pretreatment steps directly affect accuracy and efficiency of allergen quantification. We systematically reviewed the latest advances in pretreatment steps for antibody-based methods and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) protein quantification methods in food. For antibody-based methods, the effects induced by food matrix like decreased allergen solubility, epitope masking, and nonspecific binding are of the upmost importance. To mitigate interference from the matrix, effective and proper extraction can be used to obtain the target allergens with a high protein concentration and necessary epitope exposure. Removal of interfering substances, extraction systems (buffers and additives), assistive technologies, and commercial kits were discussed. About LC–MS/MS quantification, the preparation of the target peptides is the crucial step that significantly affects the efficiency and results obtained from the MS detector. The advantages and limitations of each method for pre-purification, enzymatic digestion, and peptide desalting were compared. Additionally, the application characteristics of microfluidic-based pretreatment devices were illustrated to improve the convenience and efficiency of quantification. A promising research direction is the targeted development of pretreatment methods for complex food matrices, such as lipid-based and carbohydrate-based matrices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Dairy and nondairy proteins as nano-architecture structures for delivering phenolic compounds: Unraveling their molecular interactions to maximize health benefits Food packaging technology considerations for designers: Attending to food, consumer, manufacturer, and environmental issues Machine vision combined with deep learning–based approaches for food authentication: An integrative review and new insights Reports of tropane alkaloid poisonings and analytical techniques for their determination in food crops and products from 2013 to 2023 Risks of foodborne pathogens associated with animal contamination of raw-agricultural commodities: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1