减肥手术与心脏结构和功能:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1111/obr.13843
Xiao-Qian Zhang, Ke-Ning Chen, Zu-Xuan Zhang, Nian-Rong Zhang, Fang-Jie-Yi Zheng, Biao Zhou, Hua Meng, Zhi-Xin Zhang, Wen-Quan Niu
{"title":"减肥手术与心脏结构和功能:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiao-Qian Zhang, Ke-Ning Chen, Zu-Xuan Zhang, Nian-Rong Zhang, Fang-Jie-Yi Zheng, Biao Zhou, Hua Meng, Zhi-Xin Zhang, Wen-Quan Niu","doi":"10.1111/obr.13843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity, a global health problem, is causally implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgeries are effective treatment options for obesity; however, the effectiveness of different bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function is not fully understood. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively assess this effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from their inception until November 11, 2023. Studies that compared bariatric surgeries vis-à-vis non-surgical treatment, placebo, and other bariatric surgeries, as well as reported changes in left ventricular mass or its index (LVM or LVMI) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 19 studies (17 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) and 2012 adults were meta-analyzed. Patients receiving gastric bypass had appreciably lowered LVM (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -43.86 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.09 to -26.63, p < 0.01) and LVMI (standardized mean difference: -0.67, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.32, p < 0.01) compared with other bariatric surgeries. No significant improvement in LVEF was noted across all surgeries. The drop in body mass index was most pronounced for biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (WMD -16.33 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI -21.60 to -11.05, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings of this network meta-analysis indicated that gastric bypass proved best for the improvement in cardiac structure, and there was no obvious improvement in cardiac function for all bariatric surgeries. Further studies are required to better understand the differing effectiveness of bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function and the underlying molecular mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bariatric surgeries and cardiac structure and function: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Qian Zhang, Ke-Ning Chen, Zu-Xuan Zhang, Nian-Rong Zhang, Fang-Jie-Yi Zheng, Biao Zhou, Hua Meng, Zhi-Xin Zhang, Wen-Quan Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity, a global health problem, is causally implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgeries are effective treatment options for obesity; however, the effectiveness of different bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function is not fully understood. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively assess this effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from their inception until November 11, 2023. Studies that compared bariatric surgeries vis-à-vis non-surgical treatment, placebo, and other bariatric surgeries, as well as reported changes in left ventricular mass or its index (LVM or LVMI) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 19 studies (17 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) and 2012 adults were meta-analyzed. Patients receiving gastric bypass had appreciably lowered LVM (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -43.86 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.09 to -26.63, p < 0.01) and LVMI (standardized mean difference: -0.67, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.32, p < 0.01) compared with other bariatric surgeries. No significant improvement in LVEF was noted across all surgeries. The drop in body mass index was most pronounced for biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (WMD -16.33 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI -21.60 to -11.05, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings of this network meta-analysis indicated that gastric bypass proved best for the improvement in cardiac structure, and there was no obvious improvement in cardiac function for all bariatric surgeries. Further studies are required to better understand the differing effectiveness of bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function and the underlying molecular mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13843\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖症是一个全球性的健康问题,与心血管疾病的发生有着因果关系。减肥手术是治疗肥胖症的有效方法;然而,不同减肥手术对心脏结构和功能的效果尚不完全清楚。我们进行了一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以全面评估这种有效性:我们对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 EMBASE 进行了检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 11 月 11 日。对减肥手术与非手术治疗、安慰剂和其他减肥手术进行比较的研究,以及报告左心室质量或其指数(LVM 或 LVMI)或左心室射血分数(LVEF)变化的研究进行了汇总:共对 19 项研究(17 项队列研究和 2 项随机对照试验)和 2012 名成人进行了荟萃分析。接受胃旁路手术的患者LVM明显降低(加权平均差[WMD]:-43.86 g,95%置信区间[CI]-61.09至-26.63,P 2,95%CI-21.60至-11.05,P 结论:我们的这项网络荟萃分析结果表明,接受胃旁路手术的患者LVM明显降低:我们的网络荟萃分析结果表明,胃旁路手术对心脏结构的改善效果最好,而所有减肥手术对心脏功能的改善效果都不明显。要更好地了解减肥手术对心脏结构和功能的不同效果及其潜在的分子机制,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bariatric surgeries and cardiac structure and function: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Obesity, a global health problem, is causally implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgeries are effective treatment options for obesity; however, the effectiveness of different bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function is not fully understood. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively assess this effectiveness.

Data source: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from their inception until November 11, 2023. Studies that compared bariatric surgeries vis-à-vis non-surgical treatment, placebo, and other bariatric surgeries, as well as reported changes in left ventricular mass or its index (LVM or LVMI) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were summarized.

Results: Total 19 studies (17 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) and 2012 adults were meta-analyzed. Patients receiving gastric bypass had appreciably lowered LVM (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -43.86 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.09 to -26.63, p < 0.01) and LVMI (standardized mean difference: -0.67, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.32, p < 0.01) compared with other bariatric surgeries. No significant improvement in LVEF was noted across all surgeries. The drop in body mass index was most pronounced for biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (WMD -16.33 kg/m2, 95% CI -21.60 to -11.05, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Our findings of this network meta-analysis indicated that gastric bypass proved best for the improvement in cardiac structure, and there was no obvious improvement in cardiac function for all bariatric surgeries. Further studies are required to better understand the differing effectiveness of bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function and the underlying molecular mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
Epicardial fat in heart failure-Friend, foe, or bystander. Why do preconception and pregnancy lifestyle interventions demonstrate limited success in preventing overweight and obesity in children? A scoping review investigating intervention complexity, process evaluation components, and author interpretations. Exploring the complex link between obesity and intelligence: Evidence from systematic review, updated meta-analysis, and Mendelian randomization. Gender differences in adherence and retention in Mediterranean diet interventions with a weight-loss outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Integration of observational and causal evidence for the association between adiposity and 17 gastrointestinal outcomes: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1