{"title":"减肥手术与心脏结构和功能:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiao-Qian Zhang, Ke-Ning Chen, Zu-Xuan Zhang, Nian-Rong Zhang, Fang-Jie-Yi Zheng, Biao Zhou, Hua Meng, Zhi-Xin Zhang, Wen-Quan Niu","doi":"10.1111/obr.13843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity, a global health problem, is causally implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgeries are effective treatment options for obesity; however, the effectiveness of different bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function is not fully understood. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively assess this effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from their inception until November 11, 2023. Studies that compared bariatric surgeries vis-à-vis non-surgical treatment, placebo, and other bariatric surgeries, as well as reported changes in left ventricular mass or its index (LVM or LVMI) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 19 studies (17 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) and 2012 adults were meta-analyzed. Patients receiving gastric bypass had appreciably lowered LVM (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -43.86 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.09 to -26.63, p < 0.01) and LVMI (standardized mean difference: -0.67, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.32, p < 0.01) compared with other bariatric surgeries. No significant improvement in LVEF was noted across all surgeries. The drop in body mass index was most pronounced for biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (WMD -16.33 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI -21.60 to -11.05, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings of this network meta-analysis indicated that gastric bypass proved best for the improvement in cardiac structure, and there was no obvious improvement in cardiac function for all bariatric surgeries. Further studies are required to better understand the differing effectiveness of bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function and the underlying molecular mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13843"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bariatric surgeries and cardiac structure and function: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Qian Zhang, Ke-Ning Chen, Zu-Xuan Zhang, Nian-Rong Zhang, Fang-Jie-Yi Zheng, Biao Zhou, Hua Meng, Zhi-Xin Zhang, Wen-Quan Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity, a global health problem, is causally implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgeries are effective treatment options for obesity; however, the effectiveness of different bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function is not fully understood. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively assess this effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from their inception until November 11, 2023. Studies that compared bariatric surgeries vis-à-vis non-surgical treatment, placebo, and other bariatric surgeries, as well as reported changes in left ventricular mass or its index (LVM or LVMI) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 19 studies (17 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) and 2012 adults were meta-analyzed. Patients receiving gastric bypass had appreciably lowered LVM (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -43.86 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.09 to -26.63, p < 0.01) and LVMI (standardized mean difference: -0.67, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.32, p < 0.01) compared with other bariatric surgeries. No significant improvement in LVEF was noted across all surgeries. The drop in body mass index was most pronounced for biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (WMD -16.33 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI -21.60 to -11.05, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings of this network meta-analysis indicated that gastric bypass proved best for the improvement in cardiac structure, and there was no obvious improvement in cardiac function for all bariatric surgeries. Further studies are required to better understand the differing effectiveness of bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function and the underlying molecular mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13843\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bariatric surgeries and cardiac structure and function: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Background: Obesity, a global health problem, is causally implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgeries are effective treatment options for obesity; however, the effectiveness of different bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function is not fully understood. We undertook a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively assess this effectiveness.
Data source: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched from their inception until November 11, 2023. Studies that compared bariatric surgeries vis-à-vis non-surgical treatment, placebo, and other bariatric surgeries, as well as reported changes in left ventricular mass or its index (LVM or LVMI) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were summarized.
Results: Total 19 studies (17 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) and 2012 adults were meta-analyzed. Patients receiving gastric bypass had appreciably lowered LVM (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -43.86 g, 95% confidence interval [CI] -61.09 to -26.63, p < 0.01) and LVMI (standardized mean difference: -0.67, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.32, p < 0.01) compared with other bariatric surgeries. No significant improvement in LVEF was noted across all surgeries. The drop in body mass index was most pronounced for biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (WMD -16.33 kg/m2, 95% CI -21.60 to -11.05, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Our findings of this network meta-analysis indicated that gastric bypass proved best for the improvement in cardiac structure, and there was no obvious improvement in cardiac function for all bariatric surgeries. Further studies are required to better understand the differing effectiveness of bariatric surgeries on cardiac structure and function and the underlying molecular mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.