Laura Marchasson, Christophe Rault, Sylvain Le Pape, François Arrivé, Rémi Coudroy, Jean-Pierre Frat, Vanessa Bironneau, Etienne-Marie Jutant, Quentin Heraud, Xavier Drouot, Arnaud W Thille
{"title":"睡眠障碍对重症监护室治疗效果的影响。","authors":"Laura Marchasson, Christophe Rault, Sylvain Le Pape, François Arrivé, Rémi Coudroy, Jean-Pierre Frat, Vanessa Bironneau, Etienne-Marie Jutant, Quentin Heraud, Xavier Drouot, Arnaud W Thille","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep deprivation is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and may alter respiratory performance. Few studies have assessed the role of sleep disturbances on outcomes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that sleep disturbances may be associated with poor outcomes in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis pooling three observational studies assessing sleep by complete polysomnography in 131 conscious and non-sedated patients included at different times of their ICU stay. Sleep was assessed early in a group of patients admitted for acute respiratory failure while breathing spontaneously (n = 34), or under mechanical ventilation in patients with weaning difficulties (n = 45), or immediately after extubation (n = 52). Patients admitted for acute respiratory failure who required intubation, those under mechanical ventilation who had prolonged weaning, and those who required reintubation after extubation were considered as having poor clinical outcomes. Durations of deep sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and atypical sleep were compared according to the timing of polysomnography and the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whereas deep sleep remained preserved in patients admitted for acute respiratory failure, it was markedly reduced under mechanical ventilation and after extubation (p < 0.01). Atypical sleep was significantly more frequent in patients under mechanical ventilation than in those breathing spontaneously (p < 0.01). REM sleep was uncommon at any time of their ICU stay. Patients with complete disappearance of REM sleep (50% of patients) were more likely to have poor clinical outcomes than those with persistent REM sleep (24% vs. 9%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complete disappearance of REM sleep was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":"331"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sleep disturbances on outcomes in intensive care units.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Marchasson, Christophe Rault, Sylvain Le Pape, François Arrivé, Rémi Coudroy, Jean-Pierre Frat, Vanessa Bironneau, Etienne-Marie Jutant, Quentin Heraud, Xavier Drouot, Arnaud W Thille\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sleep deprivation is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and may alter respiratory performance. Few studies have assessed the role of sleep disturbances on outcomes in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that sleep disturbances may be associated with poor outcomes in ICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis pooling three observational studies assessing sleep by complete polysomnography in 131 conscious and non-sedated patients included at different times of their ICU stay. Sleep was assessed early in a group of patients admitted for acute respiratory failure while breathing spontaneously (n = 34), or under mechanical ventilation in patients with weaning difficulties (n = 45), or immediately after extubation (n = 52). Patients admitted for acute respiratory failure who required intubation, those under mechanical ventilation who had prolonged weaning, and those who required reintubation after extubation were considered as having poor clinical outcomes. Durations of deep sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and atypical sleep were compared according to the timing of polysomnography and the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whereas deep sleep remained preserved in patients admitted for acute respiratory failure, it was markedly reduced under mechanical ventilation and after extubation (p < 0.01). Atypical sleep was significantly more frequent in patients under mechanical ventilation than in those breathing spontaneously (p < 0.01). REM sleep was uncommon at any time of their ICU stay. Patients with complete disappearance of REM sleep (50% of patients) were more likely to have poor clinical outcomes than those with persistent REM sleep (24% vs. 9%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complete disappearance of REM sleep was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05118-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of sleep disturbances on outcomes in intensive care units.
Background: Sleep deprivation is common in intensive care units (ICUs) and may alter respiratory performance. Few studies have assessed the role of sleep disturbances on outcomes in critically ill patients.
Objectives: We hypothesized that sleep disturbances may be associated with poor outcomes in ICUs.
Methods: Post-hoc analysis pooling three observational studies assessing sleep by complete polysomnography in 131 conscious and non-sedated patients included at different times of their ICU stay. Sleep was assessed early in a group of patients admitted for acute respiratory failure while breathing spontaneously (n = 34), or under mechanical ventilation in patients with weaning difficulties (n = 45), or immediately after extubation (n = 52). Patients admitted for acute respiratory failure who required intubation, those under mechanical ventilation who had prolonged weaning, and those who required reintubation after extubation were considered as having poor clinical outcomes. Durations of deep sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and atypical sleep were compared according to the timing of polysomnography and the clinical outcomes.
Results: Whereas deep sleep remained preserved in patients admitted for acute respiratory failure, it was markedly reduced under mechanical ventilation and after extubation (p < 0.01). Atypical sleep was significantly more frequent in patients under mechanical ventilation than in those breathing spontaneously (p < 0.01). REM sleep was uncommon at any time of their ICU stay. Patients with complete disappearance of REM sleep (50% of patients) were more likely to have poor clinical outcomes than those with persistent REM sleep (24% vs. 9%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Complete disappearance of REM sleep was significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.