分化型甲状腺癌残余消融和放射性碘辅助治疗的疗效

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Endocrine Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-04064-z
Yanlin Liu, Shuhui Huang, Xiaohui Li, Tian Tian, Rui Huang
{"title":"分化型甲状腺癌残余消融和放射性碘辅助治疗的疗效","authors":"Yanlin Liu, Shuhui Huang, Xiaohui Li, Tian Tian, Rui Huang","doi":"10.1007/s12020-024-04064-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful ablation in <sup>131</sup>I therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) includes both remnant ablation (RA) and radioiodine adjuvant therapy (RAT). This study aimed to differentiate between the therapeutic efficacies of RA and RAT, investigate the factors associated with their effectiveness, and assess their impact on prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with DTC who underwent initial <sup>131</sup>I therapy at our tertiary center. The successful RA (SRA) and successful RAT (SRAT) was determined based on the <sup>131</sup>I-diagnostic whole-body scan (Dx-WBS), TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels, and neck ultrasound at the 6th month after <sup>131</sup>I therapy. The patients were divided into complete response and persistent/recurrent disease groups during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients were included, 91.8% (213/232) of patients achieved SRA, only 8.1% (19/232) failed RA (FRA). Among the 213 patients in the SRA group, 70.4% (150/213) achieved SRAT and 29.6% (63/213) failed RAT (FRAT). Only pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (OR = 46.968, 95% CI 9.731-226.699, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor predicting the failure of RAT. The prognostic analysis included 215 patients, and 6.1% (13/215) were classified as persistent/recurrent disease at the last follow-up. Both pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (HR = 4.765, 95% CI 1.371-16.566, P = 0.014) and FRAT (HR = 10.104, 95% CI 1.071-95.304, P = 0.043) independently predicted persistent/recurrent disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA is easy to achieve successfully, whereas RAT evaluation provides greater value than RA for prognosis prediction. For patients with low Tg levels and no imaging evidence of disease, routine Dx-WBS during follow-up has minimal significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11572,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacies of remnant ablation and radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yanlin Liu, Shuhui Huang, Xiaohui Li, Tian Tian, Rui Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12020-024-04064-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful ablation in <sup>131</sup>I therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) includes both remnant ablation (RA) and radioiodine adjuvant therapy (RAT). This study aimed to differentiate between the therapeutic efficacies of RA and RAT, investigate the factors associated with their effectiveness, and assess their impact on prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with DTC who underwent initial <sup>131</sup>I therapy at our tertiary center. The successful RA (SRA) and successful RAT (SRAT) was determined based on the <sup>131</sup>I-diagnostic whole-body scan (Dx-WBS), TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels, and neck ultrasound at the 6th month after <sup>131</sup>I therapy. The patients were divided into complete response and persistent/recurrent disease groups during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients were included, 91.8% (213/232) of patients achieved SRA, only 8.1% (19/232) failed RA (FRA). Among the 213 patients in the SRA group, 70.4% (150/213) achieved SRAT and 29.6% (63/213) failed RAT (FRAT). Only pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (OR = 46.968, 95% CI 9.731-226.699, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor predicting the failure of RAT. The prognostic analysis included 215 patients, and 6.1% (13/215) were classified as persistent/recurrent disease at the last follow-up. Both pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (HR = 4.765, 95% CI 1.371-16.566, P = 0.014) and FRAT (HR = 10.104, 95% CI 1.071-95.304, P = 0.043) independently predicted persistent/recurrent disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA is easy to achieve successfully, whereas RAT evaluation provides greater value than RA for prognosis prediction. For patients with low Tg levels and no imaging evidence of disease, routine Dx-WBS during follow-up has minimal significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04064-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04064-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:131I治疗分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)的成功消融包括残余消融(RA)和放射性碘辅助治疗(RAT)。本研究旨在区分RA和RAT的疗效,调查与疗效相关的因素,并评估它们对预后的影响:这项回顾性研究纳入了在我们的三级中心接受初始 131I 治疗的 DTC 患者。根据131I治疗后第6个月的131I诊断性全身扫描(Dx-WBS)、TSH刺激甲状腺球蛋白(sTg)水平和颈部超声波检查,确定成功RA(SRA)和成功RAT(SRAT)。随访期间,患者被分为完全应答组和疾病持续/复发组:共纳入 232 例患者,其中 91.8%(213/232)的患者达到了 SRA,只有 8.1%(19/232)的患者 RA 失败(FRA)。在 SRA 组的 213 名患者中,70.4%(150/213)达到 SRAT,29.6%(63/213)RAT(FRAT)失败。只有消融前 sTg >10 ng/mL(OR = 46.968,95% CI 9.731-226.699,P 10 ng/mL(HR = 4.765,95% CI 1.371-16.566,P = 0.014)和 FRAT(HR = 10.104,95% CI 1.071-95.304,P = 0.043)可独立预测疾病的持续/复发:RA很容易成功实现,而RAT评估在预后预测方面比RA更有价值。对于 Tg 水平较低且无影像学疾病证据的患者,随访期间常规 Dx-WBS 的意义微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic efficacies of remnant ablation and radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.

Background: Successful ablation in 131I therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) includes both remnant ablation (RA) and radioiodine adjuvant therapy (RAT). This study aimed to differentiate between the therapeutic efficacies of RA and RAT, investigate the factors associated with their effectiveness, and assess their impact on prognosis.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with DTC who underwent initial 131I therapy at our tertiary center. The successful RA (SRA) and successful RAT (SRAT) was determined based on the 131I-diagnostic whole-body scan (Dx-WBS), TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels, and neck ultrasound at the 6th month after 131I therapy. The patients were divided into complete response and persistent/recurrent disease groups during the follow-up period.

Results: A total of 232 patients were included, 91.8% (213/232) of patients achieved SRA, only 8.1% (19/232) failed RA (FRA). Among the 213 patients in the SRA group, 70.4% (150/213) achieved SRAT and 29.6% (63/213) failed RAT (FRAT). Only pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (OR = 46.968, 95% CI 9.731-226.699, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor predicting the failure of RAT. The prognostic analysis included 215 patients, and 6.1% (13/215) were classified as persistent/recurrent disease at the last follow-up. Both pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (HR = 4.765, 95% CI 1.371-16.566, P = 0.014) and FRAT (HR = 10.104, 95% CI 1.071-95.304, P = 0.043) independently predicted persistent/recurrent disease.

Conclusions: RA is easy to achieve successfully, whereas RAT evaluation provides greater value than RA for prognosis prediction. For patients with low Tg levels and no imaging evidence of disease, routine Dx-WBS during follow-up has minimal significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison between surgical and non-surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy: a systematic review. Women and lipoprotein apheresis: another side of gender medicine. Diabetes current and future translatable therapies. Timing of the repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: does early repeat biopsy change the rate of nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance cytology result? A comparison of brown fat tissue related hormone levels in metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1